Sentences with phrase «upon marriage in»

I am sure no one is surprised that upon their marriage in 2005, they signed a Prenuptial Agreement.

Not exact matches

I will say, though, that no «fundamentalist» Mormon would sanction the marriages you're referencing, which stand in direct opposition to the principles of their Church, which absolutely insists upon upholding the law of the land.

All other Church are corrupt and either lost the Priesthood authority thru corruption (think Catholic) or never had it, but took it upon themselves to administer the audiences of the Gospel as in baptism, marriages ect...

That law would be form based upon the belief whether you believe that marriage is for growing families, in which case you make divorce difficult or marriage is based on personal happiness where a divorce law would be more relax.

Way back in 1970, before anyone was even talking about it, Del Noce predicted gay marriage as the point upon which religious freedom would founder.

As Fiorenza has observed, «Paul's advice to remain free from the marriage bond was a frontal assault upon the institutions of existing law and the general cultural ethos, especially since it was given to a people who lived in the urban centres of the Roman Empire.»

Imputation is described tersely and truly by an English historian of the Reformation, Patrick Collinson: «[It is] a transaction somewhat like a marriage, in which Christ the bridegroom takes to himself an impoverished and wretched harlot and confers upon her all the riches that are His....

«Those who believed that Pope Francis's pastoral revolution presaged a doctrinal change in terms of marriage and family heaved a sigh of relief upon hearing his latest words.»

This is one of the reasons why artificialcontraception has had such damage upon marriages and relationships: the couple deliberately withhold their fertility and so no longer give themselves completely to each other; in doing this they deny not just the meaning of sex itself but they also subtract from loving one of its «givens» - the orientation towards giving oneself completely to one's spouse.

Based upon this observation, the cardinal makes two proposals: a more generous widening of the procedures for investigating the nullity of marriages and, invoking the criteria of mercy, a dispensation to allow, in certain cases,...

As we settle upon a state in life, some of us will receive holy orders or embark upon the sacrament of marriage.

Those who believed that Pope Francis» pastoral revolution presaged a doctrinal change in terms of marriage and family heaved a sigh of relief upon hearing his latest words.

County clerks who cite their Christian values when refusing to issue marriage licenses to same - sex couples don't also refuse licenses to cohabitating couples, or divorcees, or interfaith couples (also frowned upon in conservative Christian circles), nor do the bakers and restaurant owners who refuse to serve LGBT people refuse to serve other perceived «sinners.»

Based upon this observation, the cardinal makes two proposals: a more generous widening of the procedures for investigating the nullity of marriages and, invoking the criteria of mercy, a dispensation to allow, in certain cases, the divorced and remarried to receive Holy Communion.

A third measuring device is the extent to which the marital partners turn in upon themselves (in day - dreaming, self - comforting through overeating, etc.) or look outside the marriage for the satisfactions they should get within it.

In By the Shores of Silver Lake, Laura and her cousin Lena respond with horror upon hearing of the marriage of a homestead girl of thirteen years.

When parents in a society with race lines look with apprehension upon the marriage of their child to a person of a different race, they have in view the indignities and disabilities which the unjust society will visit upon the couple and upon their children and their children's children.

Most marriages with addicts fail when the addict gets dry, because the relationship was dependent upon the codependent fixing the addict, and all the bad stuff in the relationship was blamed on the addiction.

It is not the fruitfulness of marriage that he draws upon, not the possibility of procreation, but, in Audet's words, «an aspect which is in a sense much more radical, and which is more specifically human, namely that of love.

Among other significant ways that preliberal Christianity contributed to an expansion of human choice was to transform the idea of marriage from an institution based upon considerations of family and property to one based upon the choice and consent of individuals united in sacramental love.

If deep down you think it would be wrong to harass and lay guilt upon people in second marriages, try feeding that graciousness to yourself also.

We'll first touch upon the graces that God communicates through marriage but only very briefly because this will be developed in a more personal way in some of the other talks.

It breaks up marriages... causes shame to those in the industry... let me ask how many times do you see someone using a p - «orn actor to pitch any product... you don't b / c this industry is looked upon as trash.

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!

The family unit, resting upon the ideal of lifelong monogamous heterosexual marriage, was the ultimate source of the evil and was to be the primary targeted in the sexual revolution.

We made some suggestions towards a synthesis of this vision with some of John Paul II's insights in our March 2009 editorial, «The Assault upon the Sexes: Fostering the Papal Defence», and would also refer to Luke Gormally's pieces in our March 2006 issue, «Marriage and the Prophylactic use of condoms» and in our March 2004 issue, «Marriage, the true environment for sexual love».

Cormac Burke FAITH Magazine January — February 2011 In a timely piece following upon Pope Benedict's recent remarks concerning condom use outside marriage, Mgr Cormac Burke convincingly...

The justification of such benefits can only be based upon marriage being in the common good.

The Pope posed the question: «Does the Apostle perhaps look upon marriage exclusively from the viewpoint of a remedy for concupiscence, as used to be said in traditional theological language?

Similarly, the status of the human embryo, and the value placed upon it, have come under increasing scrutiny over the past decades, and even since DP in 2008 it has become increasingly normal to assume that it is morally acceptable to destroy embryos or to experiment upon them.12 The increasing sense of a loss of respect for human life in its earliest stages is linked to the abandonment of male - female lifelong marriage as the normal structure in which human life begins and is cherished.13 DP emphasises that «human procreation is a personal act of a husband and wife, which is not capable of substitution» (DP 16).

Before we get to the trickiest sexual questions, based upon what many people are already doing, our book deals with marriage in the context of friendship, men's and women's roles and responsibilities and how to deal with sin so that marriage gets better rather than bitter.

Indeed, it has been supposed by some that the teraphim, household gods, (Genesis 35:4; 31:19; 30 - 35; I Samuel 15:23; 19:13, 16; II Kings 23:24) were originally images of ancestors; that they were honored as such and were part of the apparatus of popular religion; (Hosea 3:4) that mortuary customs which the prophetic school later condemned grew up around them; (Cf. Deuteronomy 26:13 - 14) that the right of performing the necessary ceremonies for one's ancestors devolved upon a son and that this fact underlay both the sense of tragedy in being sonless and the practices of levirate marriage and of adoption to avoid such disaster; (Cf. Genesis 15:2 - 3; 30:3 - 8; Deuteronomy 25:5 - 10) and that this set of ideas and customs was an integral part of the whole clan organization of early Israel.

Husbands and wives can be partners in a marriage based upon a sincere and radical giving of self on the part of both spouses, a giving that results in mutual submission.

Even well - mated partners in marriage know that if they look upon each other as «someone who can provide me with the setting I need for beauty,» something goes wrong and sex becomes «routine.»

And once upon an ugly time, biracial marriage was taboo in the church.

Having recognised the value of marriage, in the subsequent paragraphs (48 - 52) it expands upon the Church's understanding of marriage:

The couples married in a Christian marriage would be doing what they have always been doing since the earliest days of the Church: entering into the «holy estate» of matrimony, the physical and spiritual union created by God upon the making of a public covenant by the bride and groom through their vows.

Therefore the Church's moral teaching states that condom use in marriage is a grave injury upon a good act.

[Ed: We discussed appropriate developments in this area in our March 2006 editorial, «Confusion over the Meanings of Marriage», and attempted them in our March 2009 editorial «The Assault upon the Sexes»]

The virtual silence over the redefinition of sex and marriage which this realpolitik has involved is touched upon in Mr Audley - Charles's letter.

He went forth upon his marriage morn, nor tarried in dalliance, but having received the commands of his emperor he straightway sought to fulfill them.

I stumbled upon an interesting article in the Columbia Spectator, the second - largest college daily paper, written by Noel Duan, a Columbia College senior and «proud career - driven feminist» — «Are You Marriage Material?»

The key is recognizing that there is a disconnect in a legal structure that encourages specialization during marriage but then, upon divorce, often treats such specialization as simply an individual «choice» made by the caretaking spouse.

I thought about that when I stumbled upon an article in the Washington Post that culled GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump's comments on women, sex, marriage and feminism taken straight from his books.

Assuming a marriage has occurred, a woman will look down upon a man who has gone down in financial status, whereas a man will not look down upon a woman who does down in financial status.

Upon divorce, a court in Alaska will grant custody of the children of the marriage to either parent, considering the following factors:

It is now incumbent upon this court to fix custody in this case, applying the principles summarized in In re Marriage of Winter, 223 N.W. 2d 165, 166 - 67 (Iowa 1974), which are recognized by both parties and need no repetition herin this case, applying the principles summarized in In re Marriage of Winter, 223 N.W. 2d 165, 166 - 67 (Iowa 1974), which are recognized by both parties and need no repetition herin In re Marriage of Winter, 223 N.W. 2d 165, 166 - 67 (Iowa 1974), which are recognized by both parties and need no repetition herIn re Marriage of Winter, 223 N.W. 2d 165, 166 - 67 (Iowa 1974), which are recognized by both parties and need no repetition here.

The reason is quite straightforward and you touch upon it in the question: There is still no consensus on same - sex marriage between EU member countries (just as there isn't on drug harm reduction policies, prostitution, gambling, euthanasia, abortion, or surrogacy).

Moreover, as Professor Leslie Green shown in a recent programme at the British Academy (Gay Marriage: Prospects and Realities, 29 May 2012), marriage offers a number of advantages not offered by same - sex civil partnerships, including portability of status, a broader understanding of the couple's status, as well as the potential for religious recognition, depending upon the religious group iMarriage: Prospects and Realities, 29 May 2012), marriage offers a number of advantages not offered by same - sex civil partnerships, including portability of status, a broader understanding of the couple's status, as well as the potential for religious recognition, depending upon the religious group imarriage offers a number of advantages not offered by same - sex civil partnerships, including portability of status, a broader understanding of the couple's status, as well as the potential for religious recognition, depending upon the religious group involved.

Sean believes that same sex marriages should be legally recognized in New York State and has promised to file suit against the federal government based on constitutional challenges regarding DOMA upon election.