Not exact matches
National integrity and independence in a democratic world community are contingent upon acceptance and practice of national responsibility for the pursuit of justice and the relinquishment of the principle that the nation is a law unto
National integrity and independence in a democratic world community are contingent
upon acceptance and practice of
national responsibility for the pursuit of justice and the relinquishment of the principle that the nation is a law unto
national responsibility for the pursuit of justice and the relinquishment of the principle that the nation is a
law unto itself.
And whereas, it is the duty of nations as as well as of men, to owe their dependence
upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions, in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon; and to recognize the sublime truth, announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord: And, in so much as we know that, by His divine
law, nations, like individuals, are subjected to punishments and chastisements in this world, may we not justly fear that the awful calamity of civil war, which now desolates the land, may be but a punishment inflicted
upon us for our presumptuous sins, to the needful end of our
national reformation as a whole People?
Both views are embedded in our
national history — the republican view more in the Declaration of Independence, where Jefferson in its opening lines refers to «the
laws of nature and of nature «s God» that stand above and judge the
laws of men; and the liberal view more in the Constitution, where there is no reference to God at all, and the emphasis is
upon the balancing of powers.6.
The New Testament is in itself all that is necessary as a basis for Christian faith, but much light is thrown
upon God's dealings with man in the story of Israel's halting and gradual discovery of the true nature of God as universal, not
national; as
law - abiding, not capricious; as a God of peace, not war; as a God of justice, love and mercy rather than of wrath, and vengeance.
In light of the corruption trials of two former legislative leaders taking place this week and New York State's D - minus grade in how it handles issues of integrity from a
national comparison study, New York's leading good government groups today called
upon the New York State legislature and governor to complete the job of reforming our
laws governing public ethics.
What is in serious doubt, however, is the ensuing overreaction of the Suffolk County Legislature, which subsequently passed legislation effectively requiring all county residents operating «a pleasure vessel
upon the waters of Suffolk County» to take an 11 - hour boating safety course and pass a final exam before being issued a boating safety certificate by «the Commission of the NYS Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; by the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary; or by any other entity that offers a boating course that meets the standards set by the
National Association of Boating
Law Administrators.»
The truth about these crimes needs to be provided for the protection of victims of those crimes but also people and society (
national and international) in general: the identity formation taking place in schools touches
upon individual and collective (
national) identities at the same time, the objectives of education under international human rights
law demand putting a student, an individual, in the centre of the learning process to fully develop his personality and at the same time take into account the demands of democratic society in state and in the world — the world in which a person needs to manage and which needs good peaceful citizens.
The twin principles
upon which rests the so - called Solomon Amendment [to the fiscal 1983 Defense Department authorization bill, passed last year], which denies federal assistance to students who fail to register for a potential military draft, are these: It is the first priority of our federal government to preserve freedom and
national security, and it is the primary responsibility of free citizens to obey the
laws that are necessary to guarantee...
Although state
laws vary widely in terms of the policies governing charter school oversight and accountability, these publically funded institutions, which receive freedom from the rules and regulations of traditional district schools in exchange for meeting agreed -
upon performance targets, now serve an estimated 2.9 million students in more than 6,700 schools around the country (
National Alliance of Public Charter Schools [NAPCS], 2015).
Also, the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, approved December 13, 1977 (DC
Law 2 - 38; DC Official Code § 2 - 1402.11 (2006), as amended) states the following: Pertinent section of DC Code § 2 - 1402.11: It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice to do any of the following acts, wholly or partially for a discriminatory reason based
upon the actual or perceived: race, color, religion,
national origin, sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, family responsibilities, genetic information, disability, matriculation, or political affiliation of any individual.
Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the
laws under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, or
national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action
upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance.
«Credit Services Organization» does not include any of the following: (i) a person authorized to make loans or extensions of credit under the
laws of this State or the United States who is subject to regulation and supervision by this State or the United States, or a lender approved by the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for participation in a mortgage insurance program under the
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. Section 1701 et seq.); (ii) a bank or savings and loan association whose deposits or accounts are eligible for insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, or a subsidiary of such a bank or savings and loan association; (iii) a credit union doing business in this State; (iv) a nonprofit organization exempt from taxation under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, [FN1] provided that such organization does not charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to or
upon the execution of a contract or other agreement between the buyer and the nonprofit organization; (v) a person licensed as a real estate broker by this state if the person is acting within the course and scope of that license; (vi) a person licensed to practice
law in this State acting within the course and scope of the person's practice as an attorney; (vii) a broker - dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission acting within the course and scope of that regulation; (viii) a consumer reporting agency; and (ix) a residential mortgage loan broker or banker who is duly licensed under the Illinois Residential Mortgage License Act of 1987.
While some states use federal
laws as building blocks for more stringent state
laws, Texas does little to expand
upon national protections.
These
laws not only expand
upon federal protections but also tread where
national laws don't.
This article explains what the
National Ocean Policy is, how it builds
upon and is distinguished from past ocean governance
laws, and what the NOP will need to succeed in effectively managing our coastal resources and preserving the value of our coasts, including the recreational and ecological services it provides.
Building
upon proposed federally mandated protections, the Conservation
Law Foundation (CLF), the
National Wildlife Federation (NWF) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), working together with Deepwater Wind, Energy Management, Inc. (owner of Cape Wind in Massachusetts) and NRG Bluewater Wind, have drafted a set of protective measures that these developers will voluntarily implement over the next four years in areas designated by the administration as Mid-Atlantic Wind Energy Areas, which stretch from New Jersey to Virginia (map available here: http://on.doi.gov/UWoNPF).
It's just establishing its own group, rather than relying 100 % on the UN group to base their
national policies and
laws upon.
Part 1 of PIPEDA (privacy - «Protection of Personal Information»), s. 5, does the same thing — it basis a whole body of
laws upon compliance with a
National Standard of Canada, the, Model Code for the Protection of Personal Information, CAN / CSA - Q 830 - 96 (in Schedule 1 of PIPEDA).
While the Canadian Bar Association is usually busy intervening in court cases, making submissions to government, commenting on proposed legislation and supporting members, it's not every day that the CBA is called
upon to help the public understand the nuances of a pressing
national issue which raises concerns about the rule of
law.
If, as with investor state dispute settlement, such a claim would bypass the
national courts and thus the preliminary ruling architecture, then the decision of the joint court would constitute an application of the EU
law manifested in the withdrawal agreement with a result that would be binding
upon the host Member State in question.
Therefore, just as the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts state that in order to function properly, they need standards such as 72.34 (e.g., s. 31.5 CEA; s. 34.1 (8) OEA; and, s. 41.6 AEA), those new
laws will have to depend heavily
upon new
national standards.
This is particularly relevant as the EFTA court has been called
upon to adjudicate rights analogous to those found in primary and secondary
law, but with the explicit caveat that the concept of citizenship of the European Union does not apply to
nationals of EEA states.
In another recent article, 2020 Vision, published in
National, the official magazine of the Canadian Bar Association, lawyer and writer Mitch Kowalski imagines a speech delivered in the year 2020 by one Nancy Kwan, the CEO of a professional
law corporation,
upon being named Canada's legal CEO of the year.
Even more dangerous to the rule of
law: more such
national standards will be required to serve the legislation that will be made necessary by our increasing dependence
upon electronic records and information management technology.
He attended Wake Forest University School of
Law where he was appointed to the
National Moot Court Team and received the Order of Barristers Award
upon graduation in 1986.
To the contrary of Sedona Canada 2nd, electronic records management technology makes these 3 concepts more interdependent in
law and necessary application: (1) the «system integrity concept» of the e-records provisions of the Evidence Acts; (2) the «proportionality principle» of electronic discovery proceedings; and, (3) the «Prime Directive» of 72.34: «an organization shall always be prepared to produce its records as evidence», i.e., records systems must always be kept in compliance with this
national standard (otherwise, the e-records produced, and the adequacy of their production, should not be relied
upon because, the quality of records system integrity determines the quality of records integrity — that is the «system integrity concept»).
29 That said, where a court of a Member State is called
upon to review whether fundamental rights are complied with by a
national provision or measure which, in a situation where action of the Member States is not entirely determined by European Union
law, implements the latter for the purposes of Article 51 (1) of the Charter,
national authorities and courts remain free to apply
national standards of protection of fundamental rights, provided that the level of protection provided for by the Charter, as interpreted by the Court, and the primacy, unity and effectiveness of European Union
law are not thereby compromised (see, in relation to the latter aspect, Case C - 399 / 11 Melloni [2013] ECR I - 0000, paragraph 60).
Several authors have commented
upon the evolving approach of the two courts and the consequences for
national enforcement approaches; among them, a good overview is offered by the chapters contained in the volume of the Swedish studies in European
law edited by J. Nergelius and E. Kristoffersson, Human Rights in Contemporary European Law (Oxford, Hart, 201
law edited by J. Nergelius and E. Kristoffersson, Human Rights in Contemporary European
Law (Oxford, Hart, 201
Law (Oxford, Hart, 2015).
Therefore, «the specific nature of European Union
law means that the level of protection deriving from the interpretation of a
national constitution can not be automatically transposed to the European Union level nor can it be relied
upon as an argument in the context of the application of European Union
law.»
This, of course, bears a marked similarity to the famous «Solange» doctrine of the German Constitutional Court, which details the
national highest court's acceptance of EU
law conditional upon its compatibility with the substantive provisions of the German Basic L
law conditional
upon its compatibility with the substantive provisions of the German Basic
LawLaw.
Upon graduation from
law school, Theresa first worked as membership director for the
National Bar Association.
The decision provides a useful summary of the principles
upon which a Norwich Pharmacal order will be granted and is an example of how the courts will apply European and
national law to claims involving electronic media.
Summary: Current
law prohibits, among other things, an employer to make any nonjob - related inquiry, either verbally or on an application form, that expresses any limitation, specification, or limitation based
upon, among other things, a person's race, religion,
national origin, or gender.
And secondly, it can change its
laws to permit imported green electricity to be used for its
national targets (the Advocate General barely touches
upon this issue in paras 108 - 109).
In relation to EU
law, the Court distinguished between the application of proportionality according to whether the measure being reviewed was an EU measure, a
national measure implementing EU
law, or a
national measure relying
upon derogations from EU
law rights (such as the «fundamental freedoms» under the TFEU).
This recognition builds
upon the success we have had in the past two years by being recognized as NAPABA's
Law Firm of the Year in 2015 and one of the ten firms named to the
National Law Journal's Litigation Boutiques Hot List in 2014.
«Our co-counsel relationship with Sokolove is an integral part of our extended network of nationally recognized
law firms and expert consultants around the country, which provides our clients with a
national «team» of lawyers
upon which to rely,» says Mike Burg, founder and shareholder of the firm.
In many situations, the
law protects non-citizens from discrimination based
upon their
national origin.
Declaration made
upon ratification: «The Philippines, on the basis of reciprocity, will apply the Convention to the recognition and enforcement of awards made only in the territory of another Contracting State and only to differences arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, which are considered as commercial under the
national law of the State making such declaration.»
Prior to this Natalie trained at a
national law firm and moved to the Manchester office of a second leading
national firm
upon qualification, where she remained for the following two years in the family team.
Denmark shall decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on a proposal or initiative to build
upon the Schengen acquis covered by this Part, whether it will implement this measure in its
national law.
As a full service
national law firm, with strength across a wide range of practice areas, BLG's financial services and technology lawyers can seamlessly draw
upon the legal expertise of all practice areas, including securities & capital markets, investment management, intellectual property, commercial litigation and tax.
wouldn't tell the public that the problem is not the
Law Society's problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriti
Law Society's problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact
upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other
law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriti
law societies to solve this
national problem; (18) the Federation of
Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriti
Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the
Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriti
Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as
law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriti
law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.
29 It follows that, even though Mr Brey's right of residence is not directly at issue in the main proceedings, which concern only the grant of the compensatory supplement, the
national law itself establishes a direct link between the conditions for obtaining that benefit and the conditions for obtaining the legal right to reside in Austria for periods in excess of three months; the granting of a compensatory supplement is made conditional
upon the person in question meeting the requirements for obtaining that right of residence.
42 It can not therefore be inferred from Article 70 (4) of Regulation No 883/2004, read in conjunction with Article 1 (j) thereof, that EU
law precludes
national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the right to a special non ‑ contributory cash benefit is conditional
upon meeting the necessary requirements for obtaining a legal right of residence in the Member State concerned.
80 In the light of all of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that EU
law — in particular, as it results from Article 7 (1)(b), Article 8 (4) and Article 24 (1) and (2) of Directive 2004/38 — must be interpreted as precluding
national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, even as regards the period following the first three months of residence, automatically — whatever the circumstances — bars the grant of a benefit, such as the compensatory supplement provided for in Paragraph 292 (1) of the ASVG, to a
national of another Member State who is not economically active, on the grounds that, despite having been issued with a certificate of residence, he does not meet the necessary requirements for obtaining the legal right to reside on the territory of the first Member State for a period of longer than three months, since obtaining that right of residence is conditional
upon that
national having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.
You shall not post or transmit any unlawful threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate local, state,
national, or international
law, or infringe
upon another's copyright or trademark.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of these rules,
upon compliance with the requirements of this rule the supreme court may admit an individual to practice
law in this state provided that such individual has furnished satisfactory evidence that he or she has graduated from a
law school approved by the American Bar Association; has been admitted to practice
law in another state, federal territory or commonwealth or the District of Columbia for at least 5 years; has taken and passed either the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination with a scale score of at least 85 or an equivalent course in ethics taken during his or her
law school attendance; and who is the president, dean or academic director of The
National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada, including the director of The
National Center for the Courts and Media.
Regarding «membership» among a country's «
nationals,» with rights and privileges bestowed
upon them according to that country's
laws, such as voting and other similar rights.
• Licensed by Virginia DMV and
National Safety Council • 8 hour course fulfills DMV & Court Requirements • Students may receive +5 points on their driving record (every 2 years if taken Voluntarily) • Ask for more details • Bring ID and payment day of class • Certificate issued
upon completion of course • All Materials & Lunch Break Provided *** 19 years and younger: For every ticket you are convicted of, You will be required by
law to complete an 8 hour Driver Improvement course.