Not exact matches
Despite criticism that the plate was religious in
nature, a court case ruled that the plate could stay
because removing it would have impeded
upon the freedom of speech.
He pointed out how,
because of the dominant reductionist view of human
nature, scientists are increasingly tempted to treat the human individual as «an object to be investigated, measured and experimented
upon» rather than as an «irreducible subject».
Most notably,
upon Whitehead's remark that precisely «
because it arises out of no actual world [the primordial
nature] has within it no components which are standards of comparison» (PR 47).
If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much
because evaluation is logically dependent
upon gradations of importance, but
because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial
nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of
nature.»
This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves
because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So,
upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the
nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light
because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.
They are secondary
because historically and philosophically they have a different pedigree, being based
upon a few preconceived ideas concerning the
nature and processes of the universe, and of man,
upon which the whole concatenation of objections hinge.
With all due respect, you can provide no empirical evidence for the «immutable good
nature of god»
because, after all, this is an opinion based
upon presuppositionalist religious faith (i.e. the cart is way out in front of the horse).
''... we must avoid the notion that the created spirit,
because its only intelligible end is God, has any «claims», «rights» or «debts» to collect
upon the
nature of God.
In the Old Testament, when God looks like He is behaving in ways that do not match the
nature and character of God as revealed in Jesus Christ, this is not
because God is being deceptive, but
because God is taking the sins of His people
upon Himself just as Jesus did on the cross.
To a modernist, who by definition relies only
upon human authority, natural law in the Thomistic sense is no longer supportable
because it would have to rest
upon the unacceptable premise that
nature was supernaturally created.
Leff's lecture made a powerful impression
upon a generation of legal scholars
because he stated the
nature of the impasse so convincingly.
Hegel hinted at this when he recognized the slave, not the master, as the instrument of History,
because the slave works
upon nature and molds it to human consciousness.
The sociologist of religion will have to examine the character of this twofold relationship in the case of each individual group
because the
nature, intensity, duration, and organization of a religious group depends
upon the way in which its members experience God, conceive of, and communicate with Him, and
upon the way they experience fellowship, conceive of, and practice it.
It may well be said that the [acceptance of man] in - spite - of [his sin] character of the Christian faith, by means of prophetic criticism and the «will to transform» based
upon divine justice, functions as a militant element in the realm of human society and history, whereas the just -
because - of [human sin and selfishness acceptance]
nature of Buddhist realization,... functions as a stabilizing element running beneath all social and historical levels.
Because process philosophy is essentially a relational philosophy, it has in common with feminism an emphasis
upon the interconnectedness of persons and of humans with
nature.
They will know that whatever may be the real and ultimate truth of God's being and purpose (and it must be, in the
nature of the case, far beyond our knowing), we never approach so near to that truth as when we say with Paul, «God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us,» or with the author of the Fourth Gospel, «God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son,» or with still another of those
upon whom the light first shone,»
Because of the great love wherewith he hath loved us, God hath made us, who were dead in sins, to live again with Christ.»
But it is so imposing
because we have spent
upon the outside all that is imposing in our
natures — and what we find when we look within must necessarily be as it is, shabby and insufficient.
predeterminism is not a topic I wanted to expand
upon because of the
nature of the discussion — God vs Materialism — but we are on the same wavelength
It seems that a good deal of confusion has arisen
because of lack of clarity concerning the
nature of violence, Building on the analysis of Troy Organ («The Anatomy of Violence,» The Personalist, Autumn 1970), we might define a violent act as one in which the agent, according to the judgment of an ideal observer, is objectively attempting to impose his will
upon another.
But the subsequent discussion showed that Bultmann was concerned to minimize this element of continuity for the following reasons: (1) he was fearful that historical research might come to be used to legitimate the kerygma, which would be a denial of its
nature as kerygma; and (2) he insisted that there can be no real material continuity,
because the kerygma lays major emphasis
upon a particular understanding of the death of Jesus, whereas we can never know how the historical Jesus understood his own death, and must always face the possibility that he simply broke down before it.
Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game
because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced
upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal
nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting
Is it
because it is a chemical created in a laboratory that gives it acceptance among the medical community, while coconut oil being a product of
nature is looked
upon with suspicion?
Also, yes, it does,
because the entirety of the third act and, hence, what we are meant to take away from the film are founded
upon the question of — and the apparent answer to — that character's
nature.
Louv adds that he believes «reducing that deficit — healing the broken bond between our young and
nature — is in our self - interest...
because our mental, physical, and spiritual health depends
upon it.»
Poodle people look
upon these animals as more human than dog
because of their creative and intuitive
natures.
It was only really on my degree that I had a proper go with clay, which I chanced
upon because of the multi-material
nature of the course.
She acknowledges they are depending
upon viewer sophistication,
because in the way paintings perceive
nature and issues such as climate change, the art also comments on landscape painting's history and forces of culture and politics behind it.
Smithson's «Rundowns» unlocked conceptions of
nature because they moved in the opposite direction — performing an act of visceral despoliation which,
upon reflection, turned out to beautiful and harmless.
Because some contrarian stumbled
upon it and its obscurity and regional
nature makes it fodder for «the cause».
Distinctions between citizens solely
because of their ancestry are, by their very
nature, odious to a free people whose institutions are founded
upon the doctrine of equality.
Because the
nature of the damages will vary largely between dependents and rely
upon factors known almost exclusively by the family members it is not surprising that ICBC and other insurance companies will want to interview and obtain statements from the family members immediately after the event of a tragic death brought on by a motor vehicle accident.
In fact, the term «exception» may be misleading
because its
nature is «a cautionary reminder to the recipient of the notice that, before accepting or otherwise acting
upon it, the circumstances in which it is given may require him first to satisfy himself that the giver of the notice did in fact really intend what was apparently said by it».