Not exact matches
The point is not trying to force people to believe the same as the
atheist; the point is to respect all people, allow them to live as they believe best, and do not allow people in positions of power or government to force their religious beliefs
upon others.
Please tell me — what
atheist or
atheist group is trying to «force [their beliefs]
upon other people.»
Upon careful analysis, at least ten such points become apparent: (1) Blake alone among Christian artists has created a whole mythology; (2) he was the first to discover the final loss of paradise, the first to acknowledge that innocence has been wholly swallowed up by experience; (3) no
other Christian artist or seer has so fully directed his vision to history and experience; (4) to this day his is the only Christian vision that has openly or consistently accepted a totally fallen time and space as the paradoxical presence of eternity; (5) he stands alone among Christian artists in identifying the actual passion of sex as the most immediate epiphany of either a demonic or a redemptive «Energy,» just as he is the only Christian visionary who has envisioned the universal role of the female as both a redemptive and a destructive power; (6) his is the only Christian vision of the total kenotic movement of God or the Godhead; (7) he was the first Christian «
atheist,» the first to unveil God as Satan; (8) he is the most Christocentric of Christian seers and artists; (9) only Blake has created a Christian vision of the full identity of Jesus with the individual human being (the «minute particular»); and (10) as the sole creator of a post-biblical Christian apocalypse, he has given Christendom its only vision of a total cosmic reversal of history.
I bet it is rehashed in the next gubernatorial race and
other occasions until it gets passed and subsequently slapped down by the US Supreme Court,
upon which not a single
atheist has ever sat.
In Village
Atheists: How America's Unbelievers Made Their Way in a Godly Nation, Leigh Eric Schmidt tells the story of these unbelievers (who also went by «infidels,» «atheists,» «secularists,» «freethinkers,» and other names) through extended portraits of four «public atheists,» who «built infidel personas of far - flung notoriety upon their religious ruptures
Atheists: How America's Unbelievers Made Their Way in a Godly Nation, Leigh Eric Schmidt tells the story of these unbelievers (who also went by «infidels,» «
atheists,» «secularists,» «freethinkers,» and other names) through extended portraits of four «public atheists,» who «built infidel personas of far - flung notoriety upon their religious ruptures
atheists,» «secularists,» «freethinkers,» and
other names) through extended portraits of four «public
atheists,» who «built infidel personas of far - flung notoriety upon their religious ruptures
atheists,» who «built infidel personas of far - flung notoriety
upon their religious ruptures.»
That many
Atheists are just as bad as all fundelmentalists of every religion, in that they believe in their own superiority over
others based
upon what they believe (or don't) in.
Why should it be acceptable for christians, jews, muslims or
others to convert people to their religion, but once a group of
atheists speaks up it is frowned
upon?
Some
Atheist angles may be content to allow the rest of the world believe whatever it wants, but so long as those beliefs are hoisted
upon others as a burden to bear, used to judge and separate people who are unlike
others, and make absolutely no sense whatsoever... I personally will always crusade for the destruction of this plague.
Upon joining
Atheist Passions, you become a member of the Passions Network network of sites, with the option to add
other Passions Network sites into your account if you choose *.