Elaine Cameron - Weir's project builds
upon that tradition in deeply creative ways, drawing inspiration from the past and present to address the uncertainty of our future.»
Referencing both the historical genre of portraiture and documentary - style photography, these artists expound
upon these traditions in divergent and unique ways.
Not exact matches
On what he wants to see happen next: «I would advise [Obama] personally call for a special committee to review these interception programs, repudiate the dangerous «State Secrets» privilege, and,
upon preparing to leave office, begin a
tradition for all Presidents forthwith to demonstrate their respect for the law by appointing a special investigator to review the policies of their years
in office for any wrongdoing.
«The experience of the broad oriental
tradition of a married clergy could also be drawn
upon,» he writes, without specificying what that means
in the context of the debate over married clergy
in non-Eastern
traditions.
Another connection is possible, I think, one that draws
upon the Attic
tradition of crowning the victor of the Pythian games with a laurel wreath and, more likely still, its Christian acception, symbolizing death's defeat
in Christ.
The Catholic
tradition — even the wise Pope Benedict — still seems to put too much stress
upon caritas, virtue, justice, and good intentions, and not nearly enough on methods for defeating human sin
in all its devious and persistent forms.
In particular, we pray for peace in Ukraine, a country of ancient Christian tradition, while we call upon all parties involved to pursue the path of dialogue and of respect for international law in order to bring an end to the conflict and allow all Ukrainians to live in harmon
In particular, we pray for peace
in Ukraine, a country of ancient Christian tradition, while we call upon all parties involved to pursue the path of dialogue and of respect for international law in order to bring an end to the conflict and allow all Ukrainians to live in harmon
in Ukraine, a country of ancient Christian
tradition, while we call
upon all parties involved to pursue the path of dialogue and of respect for international law
in order to bring an end to the conflict and allow all Ukrainians to live in harmon
in order to bring an end to the conflict and allow all Ukrainians to live
in harmon
in harmony.
Such development of doctrine, typically
in response to grave error and deviant
traditions built
upon such error, is to be understood not as an addition to the apostolic teaching contained
in Holy Scripture but as Spirit - guided insight into the fullness of that teaching.
With scant grounding
in constitutional text or
tradition, court majorities took it
upon themselves (usually over strong dissents) to remove a number of matters from legislative and local control.
My only problem with your article centers on the
Traditions violation and
in that the
Traditions are based
upon humility of the individual and primacy of AA as a whole, perhaps they would be worthy of consideration.
Such thought could, of course, be understood as «church theology,» but the tendency of that rubric is to focus attention
upon the
traditions and current life of the church
in a way that is too limiting.
The Jewish basis for this hope lies especially
in the Noahide Laws, a set of seven laws binding
upon all humanity that were, according to rabbinic
tradition, given to Noah.
Another vision of democracy; however, sees it not only
in terms of its result (private freedoms) but
in terms of its foundation
upon the virtues known
in the classic
tradition as «republican» or «civic» virtues.
So the
tradition (described
in various documents, finally compiled
in the Codex Calixtinus) records James's preaching
in Hispania (sometimes with little success, as when, discouraged, he implored help from Our Lady, who appeared to help him enthroned
upon a pillar,
in the city now called Zaragoza.)
In light of this long history of controversy it is striking that theologians representing these traditions today do not insist upon their historic formulations in a divisive wa
In light of this long history of controversy it is striking that theologians representing these
traditions today do not insist
upon their historic formulations
in a divisive wa
in a divisive way.
Theological exegesis of the Bible advances
upon the assumption that the Nicene
tradition,
in all its diversity and controversy, provides the proper basis for the interpretation of the Bible as Christian Scripture.»
The modern individual has too often subjugated the spontaneous to the orderly, the possible to the necessary, the enthusiastic to the reasonable, the wonderful to the regular.9
In yet another description, Keen identifies our current «dis - ease» as our inability to view life as a «story,» to integrate past, present, and future into a meaningful whole.10 The metaphysical myths of our
tradition no longer confer identity
upon us today.
It is a Western writing, Hellenistic, probably Roman; obviously written
in Greek, and not, I believe, the translation of a completed work
in a Semitic tongue; and yet resting back
upon traditions that were certainly far older than its own date, undoubtedly Palestinian
in origin, and circulating originally
in the Aramaic language spoken by the common people of Galilee and Judea
in the days of our Lord.
Upon the basis of Paul's teaching, taken alone, Christianity might possibly have foundered a century later in the rising sea of Gnosticism; possessing Mark's compilation of the historic traditions, later amplified by the other evangelists, the church held true to its course, steering with firm, unslackened grip upon the historic origins of its fa
Upon the basis of Paul's teaching, taken alone, Christianity might possibly have foundered a century later
in the rising sea of Gnosticism; possessing Mark's compilation of the historic
traditions, later amplified by the other evangelists, the church held true to its course, steering with firm, unslackened grip
upon the historic origins of its fa
upon the historic origins of its faith.
All this is basic to contemporary work on the theology of the synoptic evangelists and their
tradition; indeed, this contemporary work is consciously built
upon the foundations laid by Bultmann
in this most important book.
Richard Steel, an evangelical church pastor
in Stratford -
upon - Avon, believes the shroud stands above Protestant concerns about the veneration of relics
in the Catholic
tradition, saying: «If it is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ, it's one of the most important relics that the Christian Church has.»
Mark, on the contrary, still moves
upon the level of the received
tradition, and makes almost no effort to interpret it
in terms of general ideas.
He must either become more and more unreasonably dogmatic, affirming that on all these questions he has answers given him by his
tradition that are not subject to further adjudication, or else he must finally acknowledge that his theological work does rest
upon presuppositions that are subject to evaluation
in the context of general reflection.
In view of the emphasis upon «tax collectors and sinners that is so widespread in the tradition, it is natural to see this emphasis upon universalism as arising out of that concer
In view of the emphasis
upon «tax collectors and sinners that is so widespread
in the tradition, it is natural to see this emphasis upon universalism as arising out of that concer
in the
tradition, it is natural to see this emphasis
upon universalism as arising out of that concern.
So we move behind the Greek of Luke 7.20 to an Aramaic
tradition which has been variously translated, and we must necessarily conclude that Thomas 113 is not,
in fact, dependent
upon Luke 17.20, but
upon a
tradition upon which Luke also is dependent.
Not only is it true that the idea of the consequent nature of God is metaphysically dependent
upon a particular historical
tradition, but I would also suggest the possibility that it is directed wholly and without remainder to what the Christian, and only the Christian, has known as the total and final presence of God
in Christ.
As he gradually» conducted his political witness of resistance to Nazism, he returned repeatedly to the foundations of his Protestant
tradition to explore and elaborate
upon what that
tradition had to offer
in this «world come of age.»
Today, Christians of integrity are thrown back
upon the never reducible testimony of Scripture,
Tradition and the divine Spirit — a testimony that defies possession, but also manifests an exceptional trust
in the insight, imagination, reasonableness and spiritual courage of ordinary human beings when they are modest enough to ask for what they do not and can not possess.
The ashes imposed
upon the forehead is an old semitic
tradition where someone
in mourning wears sackcloth, pours ashes on himself, dishevels his hair, sits
in ashes and goes without water.
That
tradition is premised
upon the understanding that we live
in a «fallen» creation that is far from the best of all possible worlds.
Upon that screen they projected certain fantasies, dreams, and nightmares long carried
in the baggage of European
tradition but seldom heretofore finding so vivid and concrete an objective correlative.
If form criticism served to draw attention to the theology of the Church
in the formative period of the oral
tradition, scholarship today is concentrating
upon the influence of the evangelists» theologies
upon the Gospels.
But it depends
upon their giving up both their uncritical acceptance of the present ideology of modernization identifying it with Christianity and any revival of primalism
in a militant and fundamentalist way
in the name of their self - identity, and evaluating both modernity and
tradition in the light of Christian personalism i.e. the idea of human beings as persons
in community, and all natural and social functions as sacramental means of communion
in the purpose of God.
They continued to be made until well on
in the second century,
upon the basis of still floating oral
tradition.
c Finally, it is through the medium of education that there ensues, directly and indirectly, the gradual incorporation of the World
in the Word Incarnate: indirectly,
in the degree
in which the heart of a collective Mankind increasingly turned inward
upon itself is made ready for this high transformation; directly, to the extent that the tide of Grace historically released by Jesus Christ is propagated only by being borne on a living
tradition.
Within the common
tradition there is, despite differences
in polity between the churches, a long - recognized obligation enjoined
upon all to seek
in every way possible to ensure that de facto and de jure authority are combined whenever appointment to office is made.
Thus the omission or adoption of Christian views about Jesus
in the Rabbinic
tradition has no direct bearing
upon their historicity.
Nevertheless, the history of Jesus puts him clearly
in the prophetic
tradition of blunt speech concerning God's judgment
upon sin.
The fact may be explained by saying that everything goes back to, or rests
upon, the Gospel of Mark; but I think we can not assume that this Gospel would have been accepted if
upon any major point its general outline had been found to be faulty or inaccurate by those who were
in touch with the primitive
tradition handed down
in the churches
in Palestine.
We have, therefore, more than the outline of Mark to rely
upon; it is supplemented and confirmed by the
tradition recorded
in the speeches of Acts — themselves perhaps embedded
in old Judean, Jerusalem, or Caesarean sources, oral or written, which had come down from the primitive community and were incorporated by the author of Acts
in his volume.
The gospel which a preacher is to proclaim is to be seen as a bold affirmation, based
upon the earliest Christian witness and the confirmation of that witness
in the agelong Christian
tradition, that we humans are loved, that we can be delivered from the lovelessness which makes us miserable and lonely, and that we can be enabled to return love even if very inadequately and partially.
I think, for example, it is arguable that the small Karaite Jewish sect that relies
upon the Bible only and rejects the Talmud and the Protestant reformers with their similar reliance
upon sola Scriptura came up with standards that can be applied practically and that are rooted
in the
traditions they seek to reform.
Lodged
in the understanding of theology as reflection
upon how we are to order our lives
in response to God's ordering and reordering of our lives, individually and corporately, these theological definitions are somewhat arbitrary, though not without being informed by the
tradition.
For all the difficulty of understanding his thought, he can be more readily grasped and appreciated by Western man than can, for example, Oriental thought, because Whitehead's thought is built
upon what is already familiar to us
in our own Western culture and
tradition.
After all, when writing a book about music and Christianity, why wouldn't one bother to emphasize that great
tradition of musically - focused Christian faith, drawing
upon the resources which,
in God's providence, that
tradition alone could provide.
Taken together, they argue for «change» but,
in the hands of O'Malley, with a wary glance
upon the inherited
tradition of the Church, earlier conciliar authenticity and the authority of papal teaching.
«The society exists,» explains its website, «to promote and sustain fellowship and truth — seeking (fides quaerens intellectum)
in theological reflection
upon the Christian faith, within the mainstream of the Christian Church and
tradition in light of the theological legacy of Thomas F. Torrance.»
What is therefore necessary, according to Cobb, is a Christian natural theology: a coherent statement about the nature of reality that recognizes its interpretation of the facts to be decisively conditioned by the Christian
tradition, yet remains content to rest its case
upon purely philosophical criteria of truth.124 Cobb offers such a statement
in his important book, A Christian Natural Theology.
[4] Religious historian James Noel points out the problematics inherent
in the contradictory worldviews
upon which New Thought is based: philosophical non-dualism on the one hand, and the dualism of the Judeo - Christian biblical
tradition on the other.
In any case, we can see that his metaphors for God's active presence enlarged
upon and enriched the biblical
tradition, rather than being simply derivative.