Sentences with phrase «upon the science in»

To help teachers expand upon the science in the movie, Science Buddies has developed the Model of a Black Hole science activity that teachers can do with students after watching the movie.

Not exact matches

Upon launching the business, while Yates knew how to reach potential customers thanks to her experience in online sales, having worked for big companies such as Google and Facebook — science wasn't her area.

DO NOT be an apologist or accept the explanation «your mind is too small to understand the greatness of science» or «evolution moves in mysterious ways» when you come upon logical inconsistencies in your belief.

In school, Christian children are forced to learn all about evolution in science and history, but can't even speak the word «God» without being frowned upoIn school, Christian children are forced to learn all about evolution in science and history, but can't even speak the word «God» without being frowned upoin science and history, but can't even speak the word «God» without being frowned upon.

We might note the obvious influence of Leo Strauss's Natural Right and History upon Bénéton's framing of modernity, but he works out the implications of historicist relativism and Weberian social science in ways that are more attuned to both the contemporary academy and to our day - to - day lives.

The conclusion just reached suggests that supposedly value - free political science has had value commitments in spite of itself, at least to the extent that it affirms happiness to be a private matter.5 In addition, I am persuaded that political science explicitly based upon a preferential view of self - interest always implicitly invokes an objective criterion of happinesin spite of itself, at least to the extent that it affirms happiness to be a private matter.5 In addition, I am persuaded that political science explicitly based upon a preferential view of self - interest always implicitly invokes an objective criterion of happinesIn addition, I am persuaded that political science explicitly based upon a preferential view of self - interest always implicitly invokes an objective criterion of happiness.

In other words, mainstream political science has insisted upon the logical independence of fact and value, such that only propositions about facts can be properly called true or false, and the study of political facts is «value - neutral» or «value - free.»

Discussion Upon Fundamental Principles in Education, opened by Professor A. N. Whitehead, F.R.S.» Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Bournemouth, 1919.

Why has science lagged behind the Bible in knowing that the earth is «hanging upon nothing», as seen at Job 26:7, some 3,600 years ago?

The discoveries of modern science are real advances in the knowing of God's creation and so have an impact upon theology.

Such human «mindfulness» should be reflected upon in order to understand what the success of science means, and, as a result, in discerning an absolute Mind to be worshipped.

In 1996 he reflected upon the purpose of the above Secretariat in Culture and Faith, «Science affects our twentieth century culture in many wayIn 1996 he reflected upon the purpose of the above Secretariat in Culture and Faith, «Science affects our twentieth century culture in many wayin Culture and Faith, «Science affects our twentieth century culture in many wayin many ways.

Science, like all intelligent observation, is gradually unveiling and homing in upon these laws.

It surfaced during the challenges presented to the role of the Church during the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th century; it makes strides upon the publication of The Origin of The Species by Charles Darwin in the 19th century; its has gathered force in the 21st century as the role of science in Western civilization is being presented with its own challenges... of still yet unanswered questions.

For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.

Though science has reached phenomenal heights in our time, it has at no point invalidated anything basic to Christian faith, and at no time in human history has the revelation of God in Christ shone upon the human scene with greater clarity and power.

The kind of theology I will be engaged in here, by no means the only kind, could be called heuristic theology; in analogy with some similar activities in the sciences, it «plays» with possibilities in order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon Goin here, by no means the only kind, could be called heuristic theology; in analogy with some similar activities in the sciences, it «plays» with possibilities in order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon Goin analogy with some similar activities in the sciences, it «plays» with possibilities in order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon Goin the sciences, it «plays» with possibilities in order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon Goin order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon GoIn the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon God.

The answer depends entirely upon how the science of that time — science in the broadest sense — understands the cell and its functioning.

Not anything can be studied as a science, without our being in possession of the principles upon which it is founded; and as this is not the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.

That is why philosophy nurtured within the Universitas is called upon... «to link theology, philosophy and science between them in full respect -LSB-...] of their reciprocal autonomy, but also in the awareness of the intrinsic unity that holds them together.»

In these last two there will be a greater focus upon science and technology.

Just as science must constantly revise its models so as to surmount the deficiencies of its abstract (usually mathematical) models of nature, so also religions are called upon continually to revise their enigmatic representations of cosmic significance in keeping with primary perceptions intuition of an ongoing cosmic adventure.

What we ought to be able to discover in this world picture, once the incredible science is gone, is a conception of the universe in which, under what are for us weird and frequently utterly impossible images, the whole creation is seen as dependent upon a loving and active God who is its ultimate meaning and its ground of being.

Even while acknowledging some lat.itude in these early chapters, it appears that science is increasingly able to corroborate what we have held in faith based upon biblical texts, including bases for such matters as an ancient deluge, genetic linking back to one mother and possible on father, and the possibility of extended life - spans prior to the deluge.

Causality as treated in these arguments is a purely metaphysical idea that is not dependent for its validity upon its relevance in the special sciences.

This science is based upon our human ability to recognize achievement in the biosphere.

«In CV, however, you will never find a statement of religious origin without an accompanying human and rational justification, upon the condition, quite naturally, that reason complies in full with its duty and that the sciences do not let themselves be guided by ideologieIn CV, however, you will never find a statement of religious origin without an accompanying human and rational justification, upon the condition, quite naturally, that reason complies in full with its duty and that the sciences do not let themselves be guided by ideologiein full with its duty and that the sciences do not let themselves be guided by ideologies.

The cultural and intellectual authority of science depends critically upon its absolute neutrality in such debates.

Lotze, in placing emphasis upon the disclosure of the spiritual reality in its effects, cut a path between a mechanistic science and an abstract metaphysics and thus was more immediately available to the religiously motivated mind of the period, say from 1880 to the early nineteen twenties.

fred Where in science must one accept an idea based solely upon faith?

Not that they depended in any immediate sense upon biological science for their concepts or method, or that they had any conscious concern with Darwin, but the modernism,» «environmentalism,» and «functionalism» that were explicit in their methodology and emphasis had been implicitly derived from the Darwinian theory of natural selection.

The first step in grasping Christian Science is to recognize that it not only accepts but builds upon these events, as well as upon the healing stories.

Long before the 1960s progress became increasingly identified with an enterprise, science, looked upon in many quarters as incompatible with religion.

This discussion has little or nothing to do with a belief in a god, it has everything to do with making some intelligent attempt to understand and expand upon science.

So far as I know every science in its infant days has put its principal attention upon what seemed most strikingly different from the commonplace.

It has been a platform based upon willful ignorance in the face of science and dedicated xenophobia in the face of all other demographics.

As every schoolchild who has been instructed in the rudiments of science now knows, or should know, modern genetics has provided a completely different account of the mechanism of inheritance, making untenable the blood theory upon which traditional race lore rested.

Leaving aside for the moment the prochoice arguments in favor of the abortion liberty, it is clear that great science - based industries, trajectories of medical experimentation, and perhaps the profession of bioethics itself rest in large part upon the settlement articulated in Roe v. Wade and related decisions.

Progress in science, progress in thought, progress in civilization depend for their good ultimately upon this, that they deliver the life of man into his own hands.

In Science and the Modern World God in this role is described as providing an antecedent, ordering limitation upon values prior to any given concrescence and is referred to as the principle of limitatioIn Science and the Modern World God in this role is described as providing an antecedent, ordering limitation upon values prior to any given concrescence and is referred to as the principle of limitatioin this role is described as providing an antecedent, ordering limitation upon values prior to any given concrescence and is referred to as the principle of limitation.

The religious are always looking to put religion front and center in public life: displays and signs on public property, laws based upon their religious beliefs, their beliefs taught as science in schools, bells on Sunday, etc..

That's exactly why atheists don't want believers creating laws based solely upon their beliefs, why atheists don't want those beliefs taught in schools as science, why atheists don't want those beliefs posted on public buildings, etc..

As a recovered Christian, indoctrinated as a child, cured upon receiving an education in science and history, I say it's time to put all religion on display in its proper place: on a shelf in the Museum of Falsehoods, Deceptions and Tragic Human History.

It is just here, as I think, that the broad philosophical implications of the theory of Relativity come to our aid, and would still be forced upon us as metaphysicians, even if there were not well - known specific difficulties in the details of physical science, which seem to be most readily disposed of by the theory.

In so far as contemporary developments in science can shed light upon the reality of this universe, they should be taken into account in theological discoursIn so far as contemporary developments in science can shed light upon the reality of this universe, they should be taken into account in theological discoursin science can shed light upon the reality of this universe, they should be taken into account in theological discoursin theological discourse.

Another example of a linguistic / conceptual difference between Aristotelian thought and modern science is that the former usually envisions the action of one thing upon another (for example fire heating iron), whereas in modern physics the physical world is explained in terms of mutual «interactions».

In light of the new science, he feels the need to extract metaphysics from being founded upon that which is perceived through the senses.

In speaking of science, the Pope appears, at Regensburg, to give some support for a reductionist understanding of the object of natural sciences, which process is proposed as following upon holistic «reasoning», that is metaphysics.

Spe Salvi and The Need to Refect More Upon the Impact of Science On June 28th last, in response to the 2007 Papal Encyclical Spe Salvi, L'Osservatore Romano published a piece by Ernesto Galli della Loggia.

Response to his philosophy by Christian theologians followed soon upon the publication of his early philosophical works, Science and the Modern World in 1925 and Religion in the Making in 1926.