Because polar bears are entirely dependent
upon the sea ice for their survival, any observed and projected reductions in preferred sea ice habitats can only result in declines.
Not exact matches
When the weather warms and no
ice sits
upon the
seas, the sediment on the ocean floor is mainly organic: remains of plankton and diatoms.
Such research is now becoming urgent as regional climate change is already impacting
upon areas of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula [30] and colonies in this region may already be affected by the consequent loss of
sea ice [8].
After reflecting
upon many images of
ice, rock, snow and
sea, the gallery's sound installation by Jacob Kirkegaard, is a curious oasis for reflection and rejuvenation.
This depends
upon both the thickness of the
ice, as well as the depression below
sea level.
These wildfires release soot into the atmosphere, which accelerates the rate of melting of glaciers, snow and
ice it lands
upon, which can lead to less reflectivity, meaning more of the sun's heat is absorbed, leading to more global warming, which leads to even more wildfires, not to mention greater
sea level rise, which is already threatening coastal areas around the world.
One possible explanation is that the CMIP5 models underestimate the strength of the feedback as did the CMIP3 models based
upon the systematic errors in simulated
sea ice coverage decline relative to observed rates (Boe et al., 2009b).
However,
upon inspecting the large map of Antarctica published by the American Geographical Society in 1970, George Denton and I noticed that one - third of the remaining WAIS were drained by two large
ice streams that entered Pine Island Bay, an
ice - free embayment in the Amundsen
Sea sector.
A few stay on the
ice all year round, but southerly populations survive ashore in the summer, and it is the seasonal winter feast
upon seals and other
sea mammals that gives them the nourishment to make it to the next breeding season.
[Editor's Note:
Upon review by the SIPN team, this outlook has been listed as heuristic in the
Sea Ice Outlook report.]
This prediction was seized
upon by global warming advocates as «proof» that the South Pole's unprecedented warming would melt
sea ice and cause melting
ice sheets to collapse, raising ocean levels and thus submerging worldwide coastal areas.
Building
upon Wyatt's Ph.D. thesis at the University of Colorado, Wyatt and Curry identified two key ingredients to the propagation and maintenance of this stadium wave signal: the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and
sea ice extent in the Eurasian Arctic shelf
seas.
These are species that evolved alongside an ample supply of
sea ice and depend
upon it for feeding, resting, and breeding.
There are, however, caveats: (1) multidecadal fluctuations in Arctic — subarctic climate and
sea ice appear most pronounced in the Atlantic sector, such that the pan-Arctic signal may be substantially smaller [e.g., Polyakov et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2011]; (2) the sea - ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea - ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice appear most pronounced in the Atlantic sector, such that the pan-Arctic signal may be substantially smaller [e.g., Polyakov et al., 2003; Mahajan et al., 2011]; (2) the
sea -
ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent sea - ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice records synthesized here represent primarily the cold season (winter — spring), whereas the satellite record clearly shows losses primarily in summer, suggesting that other processes and feedback are important; (3) observations show that while recent
sea -
ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice losses in winter are most pronounced in the Greenland and Barents
Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 20
Seas, the largest reductions in summer are remote from the Atlantic, e.g., Beaufort, Chukchi, and Siberian
seas (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 20
seas (National Snow and
Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
Ice Data Center, 2012, http://nsidc.org/Arcticseaicenews/); and (4) the recent reductions in
sea ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 200
ice should not be considered merely the latest in a sequence of AMOrelated multidecadal fluctuations but rather the first one to be superposed
upon an anthropogenic GHG warming background signal that is emerging strongly in the Arctic [Kaufmann et al., 2009; Serreze et al., 2009].
Upon hearing from James Hansen that the Greenland
ice is melting and Bangladesh is threatened by a 25 - metre
sea - level rise, Johann feels compelled to go on a series of long journeys involving planes, motorbikes and automobiles to find out more, including «a month - long road trip across a country that we — you, me and everyone we know — are killing.»
What seems likely to be the most interesting period of the 2017 Arctic
sea ice melting season is
upon us!
Now, I don't know about you but I have to question why NASA would publish what I consider to be an alarmist article about the melting
sea ice in the Arctic that's based
upon data from 2008?
When projecting future
sea levels, scientists have traditionally relied
upon physical models and expert assessments to project the polar
ice sheets» response to various emission scenarios.
(1) there is established scientific concern over warming of the climate system based
upon evidence from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and
ice, and rising global average
sea level;
This report discusses our current understanding of the mechanisms that link declines in Arctic
sea ice cover, loss of high - latitude snow cover, changes in Arctic - region energy fluxes, atmospheric circulation patterns, and the occurrence of extreme weather events; possible implications of more severe loss of summer Arctic
sea ice upon weather patterns at lower latitudes; major gaps in our understanding, and observational and / or modeling efforts that are needed to fill those gaps; and current opportunities and limitations for using Arctic
sea ice predictions to assess the risk of temperature / precipitation anomalies and extreme weather events over northern continents.
For consistency with the idea that wind forcing precedes
sea ice concentration anomalies by ~ 2 months (Yuan and Li 2008), we also computed the PCs of Z850 for JAS and regressed these
upon SON Antarctic
sea ice and continental temperature anomalies (not shown).
Upon reaching the
sea, a number of these large outlet glaciers extend into the water with a floating «
ice tongue».
Risks include the loss of
sea ice cover
upon which several marine mammals depend for food and protection.
Steve Nerem, the director of the widely relied -
upon research center, told FoxNews.com that his group added the 0.3 millimeters per year to the actual
sea level measurements because land masses, still rebounding from the
ice age, are rising and increasing the amount of water that oceans can hold.
Such solecisms throughout the IPCC's assessment reports (including the insertion, after the scientists had completed their final draft, of a table in which four decimal points had been right - shifted so as to multiply tenfold the observed contribution of
ice - sheets and glaciers to
sea - level rise), combined with a heavy reliance
upon computer models unskilled even in short - term projection, with initial values of key variables unmeasurable and unknown, with advancement of multiple, untestable, non-Popper-falsifiable theories, with a quantitative assignment of unduly high statistical confidence levels to non-quantitative statements that are ineluctably subject to very large uncertainties, and, above all, with the now - prolonged failure of TS to rise as predicted (Figures 1, 2), raise questions about the reliability and hence policy - relevance of the IPCC's central projections.
So did some numb Green Bay Packer fans who watched their team get frozen out of the NFL playoffs by the San Francisco 49ers in near - zero temperatures, Israeli residents confined to homes by three feet of snow that fell in Jerusalem as the worst winter storm in decades swept through the Middle East, and a group of Australian climate scientists hell - bent
upon documenting global warming aboard a Russian ship that got dangerously trapped in Antarctic
sea ice.