Sentences with phrase «upper bounds because»

We consider these two terms to be upper bounds because, as with infiltration from reservoirs, a new steady state will be achieved after a period of years, with no further change in storage.

Not exact matches

Only 10 elements will have these new intervals, because the others have at most only one stable isotope or because upper and lower bounds have not been quantified.

I've said this before and I'll say it again: I think it's very likely that if $ 9.99 becomes the upper bound for pricing on eBooks, then you are going to find $ 9.99 becomes the standard price for eBooks, period, because publishers who lose money up at the top of the pricing scale will need to recoup that money somewhere else, and the bottom of the pricing scale is a fine place to do it.

It's because the essential oil in the catnip leaves and flowers contains a substance called nepetalactone that binds to the «smelling» receptors in your cat's nose and upper lip.

The upper bound is limited because it snows more when oceans are thawed.

Because the observed temperature is very close to the upper bound of the ensemble, it is very hard to determine how much the probability has increased due to the external forcings to the climate, mainly greenhouse gases, but the factor is large.

(Note, it is a hypothetical 90 % confidence interval because the IPCC do not give the upper bound, instead giving the upper bound of a hypothetical 80 % confidence interval, ie, 6oC.)

We consider that this represents an upper bound, because it is likely that the rate of seepage from any reservoir will decrease with time as the surrounding water table rises, as assumed by Sahagian (2000).

Actually if DLR is 300 W / m ² then R1 has an upper bound of 300 W / m ² and doesn't equal it because L1 also takes a portion of DLR.

We may very well develop an attribution solution that puts a strongly defensible upper bound (or lower bound) on the effects of CO2 increases in the future, only we don't know it yet because we do not know the future yet.

Optimistically, we might think this upper bound is a substantial overestimate because AOS models are evolving and improving.

If CO2 causes more heat input, it does not matter because more Arctic Sea Ice will melt and cause more snow to limit the upper bound for Earth Temperature.

I could believe that 10 % of GDP is an upper bound even in this case, because achieving carbon neutrality basically requires a big change to infrastructure but one that only has to be performed once (though it may take years to complete).