Buying a basket of stocks that represent a margin of safety and little downside as a group, with tremendous
upside potential if things work out better than expected.
This sets us up for significant
upside potential if I'm right about the Melt Up.
But you unnecessarily give up
upside potential if you go with the most predictable 10 - year return available (the one obtained by investing 100 percent in TIPS).
There is an options strategy that may help you to protect against a decline in a stock's price but doesn't limit
your upside potential if the stock price were to go higher.
Not exact matches
If you combine those factors, the market's
upside potential could rise to up to seven or eight times the present levels.
If you never make a decision, or deliberate for too long, all the
upside or
potential opportunity could be lost.»
The view in designing and using OSUs was that they struck a balance between stock options and RSUs; they are performance - based and present significant
upside potential for superior stock price performance while sharing some attributes of traditional RSUs by offering some value to the recipient, even
if the stock price declines over the three - year measurement period.
Equity investors hear pitches from small businesses all the time, your proposal will only float to the top
if you have a plan, exude confidence, and can answer their questions about the scalability and
upside potential of your business.
The stock has dropped over 50 % in the past eight months, and even
if the firm's growth slows dramatically and margins shrink, the stock's cheap valuation makes it a safe stock with high
potential upside.
The good news is that it means there's some
potential for an
upside surprise in sentiment
if we do see some progress.
The
upside potential will be less than
if the money goes into buckets with greater
potential risk of loss.
If you are just starting your career, have a large
upside income
potential, or are expecting a big salary bump in the next few years, having the ability to make after - tax contributions to your nest egg is important.
The company currently expects revenue to rise by a low double - digit percentage rate, with
upside potential into the high teens
if customers ramp up spending.
And
if you are attempting to forecast that business» future results, invariably it will have significant
upside potential.
If Fitbit can eventually return to growth and profitability, driven by successful smartwatch products and its healthcare initiatives, the stock has a tremendous amount of
potential upside.
Looking long,
if price can break and hold above level 1 (ideally indicated by a daily close above it) then the
potential upside is illustrated in Chart 2.
«Considering the
upside potential for business and overall economic growth, there is an opportunity for small - and mid-sized businesses to think beyond Canadian borders again
if they aren't already.»
We see
upside potential in the shares
if the NAV can be increased through exploration success, and a higher P / CF multiple would be warranted on successful completion of the expansion in early 2013.
The technical in litecoin are indicating
potential for further
upside in the price, in particular
if it can break through the previous swing high from October of about $ 68.
If we lose and suffer I rather do so with potential upside coming in the future but if we lose because of Arteta or Flamini, what future upside did we gai
If we lose and suffer I rather do so with
potential upside coming in the future but
if we lose because of Arteta or Flamini, what future upside did we gai
if we lose because of Arteta or Flamini, what future
upside did we gain?
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute...
if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season,
if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most
upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit...
if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his
potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon,
if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
If we make it possible for local leaders to pilot their initiatives on a limited scale first — say, by launching an intervention in 100 treatment classrooms and tracking results relative to a set of 100 comparison classrooms — we would provide both more
upside potential and less downside risk.
I don't know
if it would work, but it might, and the
potential the
upside seems high.
The
upside is that
if you do reach a literary audience, the
potential is much wider.
Overall, the PocketBook IQ still needs some work (granted it was just released a couple of days ago), but
if you are looking for a low - cost Android - powered ereader / table, the IQ certainly has a lot of
upside and
potential.
Yes, I'm limiting my
potential upside (
if AT&T shares climb to $ 40, for example, I'll still be forced to sell at «just» $ 35)...... but that would still generate a capital gain for me... AND I'm generating immediate income in the process.
In addition to collecting time premium, you may also make or lose money on the underlying stock, but that's called capital gain (
upside potential) or,
if negative, capital loss.
Yes, I'm limiting my
potential upside (
if SBUX shares climb to $ 65, for example, I'll still be forced to sell at «just» $ 55)... but that would still generate a capital gain for me... AND I'm generating immediate income in the process.
Investing has a huge
potential upside: You could make big money
if you know what you're doing.
Tremendous
Upside Potential: Based on our analysis,
if MediciNova is successful post-transaction, Avigen stockholders could own a substantial percentage of MediciNova — approximately 45 % of the combined company.
• Tremendous
Upside Potential: Based on our analysis,
if a merger with MediciNova is successful, Avigen stockholders could own a substantial percentage of MediciNova (approximately 45 % of the combined company).
The advantage of equity investment is the
potential upside you have
if the company actually does well, and you have more control.
The
potential upside to earnings from operational improvements is large — the operating margin would double
if it achieves margins in line with peers.
If you find the right stocks / options combo, you may be able to largely offset the options themselves, limit downside, but have
potential for some
upside.
What
if I buy another 100 shares when the stock hits my strike price of $ 55 and I now do not lose the
upside potential.
Yes, I'm limiting my
potential upside (
if Kimberly - Clark shares climb to $ 120, for example, I'll still be forced to sell at «just» $ 115)...... but that would still generate a capital gain for me... AND I'm generating immediate income in the process.
For example, instead of paying $ 5,000 to buy 100 shares of stock XYZ, with options you can pay $ 200, and have the same
upside potential as
if you had bought the stock.
Yes, I'm limiting my
potential upside (
if Cisco shares climb to $ 34, for example, I'll still be forced to sell at «just» $ 32.50)... but that would still generate a capital gain for me... AND I'm generating immediate income in the process.
Even
if you want to leave yourself some
upside potential, you can probably squeeze another 3 - 4 % income per year out of your portfolio with covered calls.
And
if an investor is willing to give up some of the
upside potential he can do even better.
You think the stock may go up between now and option expiration, and would like to have some
potential upside if it does.
Note:
If you want to have maximum
upside potential then you don't want to use the covered call strategy.
Occasionally, we do take advantage of arbitrage opportunities
if we perceive there is greater
upside potential with minimum risk.
The first is to monitor our portfolios,
if we wanted to, on a minute - by - minute basis to assess the
potential upside for every single company we own.
To illustrate the first point, historically, Mr. Romick purchased a security only
if its
potential upside was at least three times greater than its
potential downside.
Yes, I'm limiting my
potential upside (
if Kroger shares climb to $ 24, for example, I'll still be forced to sell at «just» $ 22)... but that would still generate a capital gain for me... AND I'm generating immediate income in the process.
Indexed CDs will often feature a partial participation rate on the
upside potential of the benchmark, as well as capping the downside
if the benchmark decreases.
So, they may be more concerned about having cash flow at the right time, while at the same time reducing the cost of the share losing in value than they are losing the
potential upside if you do exercise the option.
If you're looking for low interest rates or are an early adopter interested in the
potential upside with the community - driven nature of the card, the Barclaycard Ring Mastercard is a good choice.
Of course,
if there is still equity in the property, then you or your heirs still have the option of realizing that equity as well.You always retain the
upside potential without the downside risk that forward borrowers face.