Sentences with phrase «upvotes for»

Upvotes for honesty, friend.

So it's possible that someone will be hugely offended, and raise a banner against me, and asking for this will have the opposite effect — getting tons of upvotes for that negative review instead (if so... that sucks, but it's already there, so trying to get rid of it seems like a reasonable thing to do).

Deleting a candidate means upvotes for everyone in the list but the deleted candidate.

Only one upvote for this statement so far?

I don't know whether to upvote this for good points, or downvote it for the formatting and lack of anything to support it.

I'm not sure if I should downvote for incorrectly getting the definition (it's not «waving at»), or upvote for the videogame origin story (which is as far as I know somewhat correct, bit not relevant enough that I was too lazy to chase it down to include in my own answer)

This will not affect the balance between major candidates (since a downvote for A is same as upvote for B, in the balance between the two)- BUT, a downvote for major candidate A is also effectively an upvote for 3 - d party candidate C!

I upvoted this for that aspect of the answer

Upvote for post re: insulin sensitivity.

I can't give you a second upvote for the edit, but have an imaginary +1 for coming back to update us - best question / update I've seen for ages

That's what I thought, but I was starting to doubt myself there, since people upvoted him for that remark, and I got blocked for inquiring about it...

Upvoted for this» It said I had issues in real life for which buying games was my remedy.»

Not exact matches

For example, the Disqus commenting system sends me a notification every time I'm «upvoted» or replied to, or when an article that I've posted is commented on:

It's very well known in the startup community as a kind of Reddit for new products, featuring Q&A's with founders, videos and a front page where people can upvote products they like the most.

Curie as an organization have a lot of STEEM power, therefore, a single upvote from results in a big payout for you.

You can only invest in players in the first team, but Football Index allows you, the account holder, to upvote any of the 500 squad players into the top bracket so they are available for selection.

@DrunkCynic But that's not how this (for some reason upvoted) answer describes it.

As I said previously in my answer, I urge you to visit StackOverFlow elections page and see how well implemented upvote / downvote system is working in practice, for moderator election.

Upvoted specifically for «the selection of the Vice-President is seen as another «plank» in the «platform» of how the President plans to govern.

I would upvote the answer if it weren't for the unnecessary use of «DUH».

Users with a total answer score (total upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.

He can make business difficult for a company while «asking nicely»: «Give a upvote to everyone and I won't send the IRS round to audit your books every Monday» but probably less crude.

The former President was clearly expressing his gratitude for their support, not actually stating he wished to grant an upvote to everyone.

I'm pretty sure this isn't allowed by Reddit's policies given it's a form of «vote cheating» (albeit the rules are oddly shaky for a blanket Upvote).

Go to school and learn basic English comprehension, like I said, you are just an uneducated moron pandering for meaningless upvotes, you have nothing upstairs... my facts are verifiable and the sources include Minstry of Finance, Central Bank of Nigeria, Presidency and Ministry of Justice archives.

I upvoted simply for use of the word «bunk».

Once it get's upvoted it will no longer be an unanswered question and good for the site.

Users with a total answer score (total upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.

Thanks to everyone because every answer or comment was useful for me and I upvoted every answer or comment but I accepted the answer given by @Evren Yurtesen because I'm doing what he mentioned in his answer.

I would, at a minimum, upvote the answer for now, but I can't due to limited rep.

The site allows for people to vote on answers to questions, which ranks the question as an «upvote» or «downvote.»

Upvoted you apart from the «Can Relax for a few years» part as The epaper market is crying for fast pace innovation rather than a new CPU per a few years being currently on offer.

I'm on StackOverflow, Workplace, and SoftwareEngineering mostly to just upvote the useful answers (for me, that is).

@JoeTaxpayer Thanks for the upvote.

Users with a total answer score (total upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.

You will earn an entry for every upvote on your posts during the contest.

If you're unfamiliar with review bombing, it's basically an act where people who are upset with a developer take their frustrations out by posting poor review scores for their game en masse, often upvoting the negative reviews at the same time to actively try lowering a game's overall user rating.

The upvote / downvote system on N4G for sites doesn't work.

That being said, since the comments seemed to have moved away from the actual game, I would just like to add my upvote to your «fooling around» with controllers for local play on the same screen.

In Steam the Game got 82 % Upvotes, in iTunes 4/5 Stars and i'll give 4/5 Stars standard, 5/5 because i've bought it for 0,54 $ in the Humble Store, without the Sony - Ripoff - Taxes.

As you journey through Yharnam, you can leave messages for your fellow travelers, which they can then upvote and downvote based on their usefulness.

Love watching the butt hurt tribes kids running through the comments down voting people who disagree and upvoting the shit out of people condemning hirez for apparently being the devil for not supporting a failing game.

Players could be given a way to «upvote» those they feel have been especially patient or helpful, and people could progressively unlock various rewards, cosmetic or otherwise, for receiving enough upvotes.

The first is when a publisher would give the game a green light for development (or previously when Greenlight existed for Steam and gamers would upvote a game through the Greenlight process, it would be «greenlit» for distribution through the Steam storefront).

Users with a total answer score (total upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.

People here are «compensated» by upvotes, reputation, and comments, and generally can't require payment in exchange for their time and efforts, nor make their work contingent on any sort of reward.

But in fact as the answer shows the use of the lights is one of the facts required for the passage through the red signal to be legal in NSW, yet for some reason you have not upvoted the answer, let alone accepted it.

But I will remember you for upvotes in the future.

I want to give this a second upvote just for someone understanding the way the internet and memes work;) don't worry I'm not planning to do it, just curious to see how the law handles some odd behaviors like this.

Reddit users showed their love for this public service announcement by upvoting it over 100 times.