Not exact matches
The one unambiguous, reform - driven victory of the last two decades has been the successful networks of
urban charter schools that we used to call «no excuses» schools before the term, which once meant there's no excuse for adults to fail children, fell into disrepute and it became de rigueur within the
movement to criticize those schools» discipline practices instead of applauding them for sending tens of thousands of low - income kids of color to college, which not long ago was nearly the entire point of the
movement.
The only course that is sustainable, for both
chartering and
urban education, embraces a third, more expansive view of the
movement's future: replace the district - based system in America's large cities with fluid, self - improving systems of
charter schools.
It basically results in a
charter movement that is designed to serve certain
urban students with no - excuses - type schools.
The push for rural consolidation is all the stranger given the
movement in
urban areas toward smaller schools, including
charter schools, so that classroom sizes are smaller and there is more accountability among students, parents, and administrators.
But a decade ago several trends in American education, and in the Catholic Church, made a Catholic - operated public school seem increasingly possible: 1) the traditional, parish - based Catholic school system, especially in the inner cities, was crumbling; 2) equally troubled
urban public - school systems were failing to educate most of their students; and 3) a burgeoning
charter school
movement, born in the early 1990s, was beginning to turn heads among educators in both the private and public sectors.
It's time for the
movement to embrace an inclusive «Social Justice Plus» strategy that aims to give
urban students access to private,
charter and suburban schools.
By allowing Catholic schools to receive government funding, a religious -
charter policy could honor the traditions of both Catholic education and the
chartering movement, allow these schools to carry on their service to the most at - risk
urban students, and adhere to state standards, assessments, and accountability frameworks.
If anything, the District's flourishing
charter movement will help Ms. Rhee by offering choice and competition while refuting some of the excuses used to justify the poor performance of
urban schools.