Research by Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes found across 41 regions,
urban charter schools on average achieve significantly greater student success in both math and reading.
According to the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) «
urban charter schools on average achieve significantly greater student success in both math and reading, which amounts to 40 additional days of learning growth in math and 28 days of additional growth in reading.»
Nationally,
urban charter schools on average achieved significantly greater student success in both math and reading than traditional public schools, said the study, which covered the academic years 2006 - 07 to 2011 - 12.
But if the spillover effects of
urban charter schools on district schools are confined to relatively small neighborhoods, then findings from prior analyses may well be underestimates.
Nascent research on the effects of
urban charter schools on other outcomes also shows promising results.
Not exact matches
To explore the influence of
school choice
on district policy and practice, we scoured media sources for evidence of
urban public -
school districts» responses to
charter competition.
In that election, voters decisively rejected a statewide measure that would have raised a cap
on the number of
charter schools that was binding only in the state's
urban centers.
Innovative
schools in
urban areas show that all children can achieve at high levels given the chance, building
on the promise of the No Child Left Behind Act, U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige said while visiting the Amistad Academy
charter school in New Haven, Connecticut, in 2004.
More than 20 public
school districts across the country, including the large
urban districts of Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia, have quietly entered into «compacts» with
charters and thereby declared their intent to collaborate with their
charter neighbors
on such efforts as professional development for teachers and measuring student success.
Efforts to bring the academic results of some of the nation's best
urban charter schools to a far larger scale are «sharply constrained» by limits
on the supply of talent willing and able to undertake the highly demanding work, argues a new working paper by Steven F. Wilson, a senior fellow at Education Sector, a Washington think tank.
This comparison is likely to generate misleading conclusions for one simple reason, as the authors themselves point out
on the first page of the executive summary and then again
on page 57 of the full report: «the concentration of
charter schools in
urban areas skews the
charter school enrollment towards having higher percentages of poor and minority students.»
They would have been built in a handful of
urban communities, where 32,000 children, a majority black and Latino, were sitting
on waiting lists of existing
charters as they languished in underperforming district
schools.
«Many of the teachers — who worked at all grade levels in both public and
charter schools, in
urban and suburban settings — did their best to cobble together lessons
on their own, while also managing the intense demands of the first years of teaching,» says Pforzheimer Professor Susan Moore Johnson, director of the Project
on the Next Generation of Teachers.
In Arizona, a state that has always had
charter schools that draw middle - class students, there is evidence that,
on average at least,
charters are not doing any better at raising student achievement than district
schools; outside of
urban areas, they appear to do a bit worse.
And to turn back to
school choice for a moment, Imberman finds that
charters in an unnamed
urban district had no effect
on student tests scores — but had large positive effects
on discipline and attendance.
In a speech Thursday to the National
Urban League in Washington, the president offered a rebuttal to such criticism, saying the steps the program encourages states to take, including lifting caps
on charter schools and using student data to inform teacher evaluation, are the right ones.
We have rigorous statistical evidence from Stanford's Center for Research
on Education Outcomes (CREDO) that
urban charter schools outperform traditional
schools (the table below comes from their 2015 study of
charters in 41
urban regions), and I believe this should be our nation's preferred
school improvement strategy.
The result is Fordham's new study
School Closures and Student Achievement: An Analysis of Ohio's
Urban Districts and
Charter Schools, which brings to bear fresh empirical evidence
on this critical issue.
Charter market share is significant and growing in most big cities, meaning authorizing will have a major bearing
on the future of
urban public
schooling.
According to a 2015 study by the Center for Research
on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University, students enrolled in
urban charter schools gained 40 additional days of learning in math per year and 28 additional days in reading compared to students in district
schools.
In states like Colorado, where
charters are perceived as public
schools serving local students, advocates may find they can build bipartisan support, especially in light of traditional conservative support for
charter schools and the sector's continued focus
on serving disadvantaged,
urban students, which appeals to liberals.
In short, the takeaway from the
charter literature seems to be that they are,
on average, more effective than traditional public
schools in
urban settings and perhaps should be encouraged there, but that authorizers and policy contexts matter tremendously in determining whether these
schools succeed or not.
The problem is that often the forest gets lost because the leaves aren't counted: the authors describe a CREDO report's conclusions
on the cumulative advantage of
urban charter schools for poor African American students but give the reader no sense of how trustworthy they deem the report to be nor how significant the purported
charter -
school impact is — compared, for example, to results of any other major
school - reform strategy.
The current cap
on charter schools in Massachusetts is binding only in
urban districts like Boston, Holyoke, Chelsea, and Lawrence, where a sizable fraction of students already attend
charters.
A session
on teacher pensions featured a presentation from Cory Koedel, Shawn Ni, Michael Podgursky, and P. Brett Xiang analyzing how well defined benefit pension plans serve
urban and
charter school teachers in Missouri.
Philadelphia Performing Arts
Charter School, run by String Theory
Schools, is an
urban K — 12 campus that leverages technology and an emphasis
on entrepreneurship to make learning relevant and real for students.
According to a 2015 study of
charters in
urban regions across the country, conducted by the Center for Research
on Education Outcomes at Stanford University, African - American students at
charters out - performed comparable students at nearby public
schools in math by roughly a half years» worth of learning.
Recent studies have cast doubt
on the value of
charter schools in DeVos» home state of Michigan, but an earlier study by Brookings found
urban charter schools across the country succeeding even as suburban ones have not.
On average,
charter schools show higher achievement than traditional public
schools, especially with traditionally underserved student groups and in
urban environments.
Phillip Lovell, vice president of federal advocacy at the nonprofit Alliance for Excellent Education, which focuses
on high
school reform, says that there are simply not enough good
charter school providers to take the place of all the low - performing, large
urban high
schools.
Over time, political debating points have pigeonholed
urban charter schools, especially those run by for - profits and
charter management organizations, as an industrialized sector bent
on homogenization.
Massachusetts»
urban charter school students are drawn from a population in which middle
school students generally score below the average
on state - wide math and English tests.
On the NAEP exams in reading and mathematics, students in
charter schools perform no better than those in regular public
schools, whether one looks at black, Hispanic or low - income students, or students in
urban districts.
Given these results, and given that there have yet to be long - term studies
on impacts
on later - life outcomes for our state's
urban charter schools, caution is warranted.
By allowing Catholic
schools to receive government funding, a religious -
charter policy could honor the traditions of both Catholic education and the
chartering movement, allow these
schools to carry
on their service to the most at - risk
urban students, and adhere to state standards, assessments, and accountability frameworks.
These include substantial spending to boost student achievement in
urban schools, networks of
charter schools as alternatives in
urban public districts, and academic benchmarks
on standardized tests for
schools as well as students.
America's outstanding
urban charter schools shed light
on the subject in a way both vexing and encouraging to Catholic education's biggest champions.
This faith - based
charter compromise could lead to a renewed
urban school system — one based
on equitable funding, more diverse options, parental choice, and comprehensive transparency and accountability.
An earlier EdNext article looks at the impact of
charter competition
on policy and practice in
urban school districts.
«We are pleased that our findings about what makes these
urban charter schools successful and the challenges that remain have the potential to inform the work of many who seek to improve
on educational outcomes for children.»
And a still - newer 2015 CREDO analysis, examining
charter schools in 41
urban communities, found them,
on average, achieving 40 additional days of learning growth in math and 28 days in reading compared to matched peers in district
schools.
To argue that she has been even moderately successful with her approach, we would have to ignore the legitimate concerns of local and national
charter reformers who know the city well, and ignore the possibility that Detroit
charters are taking advantage of loose oversight by cherry - picking students, and ignore the very low test score growth in Detroit compared with other cities
on the
urban NAEP, and ignore the policy alternatives that seem to work better (for example, closing low - performing
charter schools), and ignore the very low scores to which Detroit
charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual
schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best comparisons with DeVos's national agenda.
This research shows that
charter schools in the
urban areas of Massachusetts have large, positive effects
on educational outcomes.
He wants to train up super-talented people to be superintendents and turn them loose
on urban school systems, to invest in
charter school networks that are hitting their numbers and performing miracles regularly.
«The
charter school industry has targeted our relatively small
urban district with an over-saturation of
charters that causes a financial drain, without concern for the impact
on the majority of students who will continue to attend the public
schools.»
NBFA is a tuition - free, public
charter school, proudly distinguished by: • A progressive educational model that weaves trauma - sensitive, emotionally responsive practice into every classroom • Social emotional learning steeped in child development best practices • Parental involvement, in and outside of the classroom • Consistent, competitive high -
school placement at such
schools as Kolbe Cathedral, Hopkins and Fairfield Prep NBFA is located
on an «
urban campus» at 184 Garden Street, Bridgeport, CT (within a mile of the University of Bridgeport and the beach at Seaside Park).
Brass City
Charter School depends
on the generosity of foundations, corporations, public agencies, and individuals to realize its mission of providing our students a rigorous, well - rounded and emotionally supportive education that will eliminate the achievement gap characteristic of
urban underserved students and enable them to lead meaningful and productive lives both for themselves and for their community.
Last month, Stanford University's Center for Research
on Education Outcomes (CREDO), the nation's foremost independent analyst of
charter public school effectiveness, released a comprehensive Urban Charter Schools Report and offers unprecedented insight into the effectiveness of charter public s
charter public
school effectiveness, released a comprehensive
Urban Charter Schools Report and offers unprecedented insight into the effectiveness of charter public s
Charter Schools Report and offers unprecedented insight into the effectiveness of charter public s
Schools Report and offers unprecedented insight into the effectiveness of
charter public s
charter public
schoolsschools.
See what some of the best
urban charter school leaders have to say about why they do what they do (and how they achieve such great results in their inner - city
schools) in our short film Unchartered Territory; click
on the photo to watch this short film
on SnagFilms.com for free.
The University of Chicago Women's Board and the
Urban Education Institute volunteer committee welcomed nearly 60 young women from the University of Chicago
Charter School's Woodlawn Campus to the Quadrangle Club
on Wednesday, May 8 for an opportunity to network with female leaders in Chicago.