It relies heavily on renewables,
urban heat grids, possibly suburban hydrogen networks, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) during the four decades of transition.
Not exact matches
However, the actual claim of IPCC is that the effects of
urban heat islands effects are likely small in the
gridded temperature products (such as produced by GISS and Climate Research Unit (CRU)-RRB- because of efforts to correct for those biases.
Given the pattern of migration to the suburbs and away from the large cities, small towns and countryside any large
grid cell analysis claiming to capture the
urban heat effect has to be nonsense.
The range of the gradient is 12 kilometers (
grid 12 km by 12 km) and its purpose is to show whether or not accurate and meaningful C12 / C14 measurements can be made anywhere near a powerplant (for instance) without introducing the same bias as, say, an «
urban heat island».
If we can trust the RF calculation in the absence of effective peer - review — and using the observed global rise in T (criticism of
urban heat islands and dodgy
grid homogenising algorithms not - withstanding), then 0.7 = X (RF), where the RF for CO2 is.....?
Initially the energy input for the
heat grids would be mostly from gas, but all the gas - fired industrial CHP and
urban CHP&P capacity would be progressively converted to hydrogen, piped in from coal and biomass CCS gasifiers.