Behind the Headline Schools of Choice: Expanding opportunity for
urban minority students Education Next Spring 2016
Not exact matches
Ironically, this misguided and shortsighted opposition has ensured that the fight for the future of quality educational access (and the production of future black leaders like Obama) will be between African Americans of one generation who found prosperity working in public
education and who possess the lion's share of the political power, and the
minority students whose futures are sacrificed on the altar of the nation's ossified
urban education systems.
Many set up shop in
urban areas, serve
minority and low - income
students, and rely on a strategy and curriculum associated with an
education management organization.
Urban charter schools in Massachusetts are delivering for
minority, economically disadvantaged, special
education and ELL
students in a way that is historically unprecedented in the long struggle for equitable
education in the United States.
«
Students with disabilities served in
urban settings, in which
minorities predominate, have higher likelihood of being placed in segregated settings, and lower likelihood of accessing challenging curricula,» said Tom Hehir, lecturer at Harvard Graduate School of
Education.
Contrary to Howe's prediction, the New American Schools designs have focused overwhelmingly on improving
education for
urban and
minority students.
She has presented on
student assessment and equity at numerous conferences including the National Indian Education Association, the NEA Minority and Women's Summit, the Symposium on Student Assessment, and the National Council of Urban Education Associ
student assessment and equity at numerous conferences including the National Indian
Education Association, the NEA
Minority and Women's Summit, the Symposium on
Student Assessment, and the National Council of Urban Education Associ
Student Assessment, and the National Council of
Urban Education Associations.
In the process, Obama and Duncan are retreating from the very commitment of federal
education policy, articulated through No Child, to set clear goals for improving
student achievement in reading and mathematics, to declare to
urban, suburban, and rural districts that they could no longer continue to commit educational malpractice against poor and
minority children, and to end policies that damn children to low expectations.
They will hit hardest in poor
urban and rural communities and disproportionately affect
minority students and those in special
education.
Throughout her undergrad she tutored young
minority students from
urban public schools, served as president of the Sociology club at City College and researched racial / ethnic inequalities within the
education system.
Principal Rainey also highlighted several aspects about the school: - 2015 National Excellence in
Urban Education Award by the National Center for
Urban School Transformation - 100 % of the
students receive free and reduced lunch - 99 %
minority - 75 % of seniors took at least one AP course during high school - 2nd charter school in the country to be named an AVID National Demonstration School - 1st charter school in the country to be fully funded by bond money
In addition,
urban districts with
students most likely to benefit from class integration serve predominantly poor and
minority students, with middle - and upper - class families in short supply or opting for private
education.
Because of the void that exists between high school counseling and college advising (Grites, 1979) and because of the additional obstacles and pressures that impinge on gifted
urban minority students who attend college, the school counselor's role in preparing gifted
urban minority youth for appropriate postsecondary school
education can not be underestimated.
Gifted E525: Blending Gifted
Education and School Reform (1994) E492: Career Planning for Gifted and Talented Youth (1990) E359: Developing Individualized
Education Programs (IEPs) for the Gifted and Talented (1985) E485: Developing Leadership in Gifted Youth (1990) E514: Developing Learner Outcomes for Gifted
Students (1992) E510: Differentiating Curriculum for Gifted
Students (1991) E484: Fostering Academic Creativity in Gifted
Students (1990) E493: Fostering the Post Secondary Aspirations of Gifted
Urban Minority Students (1990) E427: Giftedness and Learning Disabilities (1985) E464: Meeting the Needs of Able Learners through Flexible Pacing (1989) E486: Mentor Relationships and Gifted Learners (1990) E483: Personal Computers Help Gifted
Students Work Smart (1990) E494: Supporting Gifted
Education Through Advocacy (1990) E478: Underachieving Gifted
Students (1990)