So bad was the Tower's reputation that one
urban myth told how the architect, wracked with guilt at creating this monstrosity, threw himself from the roof.
How is it that the conclusions of climate scientists can be called into question as a result of supposedly dubious statistical techniques, but the long history of nonsense from the skeptics, (such as the Robinson et al paper that accompanied the politically motivated Oregon Petition, the corporate funded propaganda campaigns of the Global Climate Coalition, and the recent
urban myth that Martian «global warming» disproves a human influence on earthly climate)
tells us nothing about the integrity of the skeptic theory of climate?