Sentences with phrase «us evil deniers»

PG — «You know you shouldn't let those evil DENIER conservative people brainwash your children..

corrected for link PG — «You know you shouldn't let those evil DENIER conservative people brainwash your children..

sorry again PG — «You know you shouldn't let those evil DENIER conservative people brainwash your children..

The other fun thing is of course hansen who makes these predictions is the very person in charge of the data that supposedly validates them... being that we evil deniers kind of tend look dimly on someone making claims without having any outside data to back it up.

But if you want to do away with all those evil deniers convincing people, there is a simple solution.

«Listen up, Evil Deniers.

The question is if JC has now woken up to the manipulation she's been casually inflicted by somebody fancying himself in a war against evil deniers, and therefore not at all interested in avoiding the collateral damage of poisoning this blog.

Sticking their heads above the parapet just enough to bellow «you are all going to fry, evil deniers» like Hansen before returning to their burrows?

It also leaves us evil deniers less room to work.

What separates Bush, the evil denier, from Obama, the saintly prophet, is their treatment of a cold, hostile, uninhabited, tract of frozen sea.

Not exact matches

Evil persecutes God and his followers... but can not harm any of God's children or God who is existence - only when evil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not oncEvil persecutes God and his followers... but can not harm any of God's children or God who is existence - only when evil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not oncevil perverts them individuals or confused them individuals by deceit can then harm mankind when the individual departs from the side of the lord our Heavenly God... San Peter denied Jesus one's or twice but never God himself... not once...

catholicisim is evil, it denies people the truth that is free and yet they ask money for it.

39:32 — Then, who does more wrong than one who utters a lie against Allah, and denies the truth [this Quran, the Prophet (Muhammad SAW, and Jesus the Son of Marry), the Islamic Monotheism, the Resurrection and the reward or punishment according to good or evil deeds] when it comes to him!

Now, before you declare me «stupid,» «evil» or part of a worldwide conspiracy to deny the truth of your «six days and a talking snake» theory of life on Earth, please take five minutes to read this.

Teach people s - e-xis basically bad / evil, teach people s - e-xis only for procreation, teach people anything but unsatisfying missionary position is unacceptable, deny a deep and fundamental human drive and let's see how that plays out for everyone...

However, in our Jewish tradition, the possibility of return — teshuvah — turning away from evil to come back to a more primordial source of good, can not be denied to any person or to any people on earth.

He also examines how the human being who denies these moral truths steeps himself ever deeper in perverted forms of remorse, confession, atonement, reconciliation, and justification, all in the vain attempt to convince himself and others that evil is really good.

Do I deny that some have used religion s n excuse for evil?

Must he not then deny the reality of evil and give up all realistic appraisal?

The dialectics of idealism denies the reality of sin and evil, the demonic and the satanic forces that penetrate all the structures of life.

No one who knows anything of the darker side of human life will deny that acceptance in itself can pass easily into a sentimental condonation of evil which obscures the truth of human existence.

The two do not belong together in his eyes, for while punishment, which God in His wisdom has connected with every transgression, is a Good, there is no denying that it is such a Good only when it is gratefully received, not when it is simply feared as an evil.

I would not deny that the civil religion has been used to condone evil, any more than I would deny that Christians have used their religion to condone evil.

(In fairness, I've met one who denied Original Sin, but this is not the same as denying humanity's evil.)

To claim that the world was created good is not to deny evil and the tragedies that stalk and distort ours and others lives.

I know very well that there are dark sides to every city — I experienced the dark side to Cambridge when I as running a hostel there, but that doesn't deny the fact that the majority of people in a city are not evil.

You vigorously deny the existence of God, yet you frequently blame Him for all the «evils» in the world, all the natural disasters, and everything else under the sun that is wrong in modern society.

We have seen in an earlier lecture that the presence of «evil» is not for a moment denied in such thought; neither is there any minimizing of the reality of its effect in hindering the on - going of creative occasions, with the dreadful results that inevitably follow.

If by «evil exists» you mean that evil possesses a real substance of its own, and that it therefore exists in the way goodness exists (or, for that matter, a tree, a rabbit, an idea or a dream exists), in point of fact Christian tradition has usually denied this quite forcibly.

The greatest ally to evil is denying that there is such a thing.

Rather than viewing it as a decision made for the sake of living a life free from the world's demands, Augustine agonized over the «evils» of sexuality in a doctrinal context that virtually denied the human capacity for free moral decision.

One solution, the most popular among traditional theologians, is to deny the ultimate reality of evil.

It is a dangerous thing to deny the presence of evil spirits in the world, but it is equally dangerous to think that man, by the performance of some ritual, has some power over them.

If you approve of planes flying into buildings, dressing women in cloth bags, denying stem cell research, discrimination against women, gays and anyone with alternate beliefs, denying contraception to people who can't afford families, picketing soldiers funerals, etc, etc, then keep your fuzzy mindset about good and evil.

Crudely put, the Pelagian view denied original sin; evil was more a case of unrealized human potential than some kind of congenital condition.

This would not deny nor remove the evil, but would put it in to a context where some potentiality for good may be realized.

Sometimes the picture of hell has been painted in lurid fashion, with ghastly punishment inflicted upon «lost» persons; more frequently, at least in recent theological writing, this aspect has been muted or denied, and stress has been put on such ideas as persistence after death apart from God's presence — or even in that presence, which for the utterly unworthy man or woman would be horrifying, as when an evil person is compelled to be with someone whom he or she deeply hates.

Such a view of things does not deny for a moment the presence of evil in the creation nor the appalling reality of sinfulness in men and women.

Tell me that, if there is a God, he would deny an afterlife to a person who lives a good and just life, and accept a person who has led an evil life, and at the last moment begs forgiveness.

However, He also gave us free will (ultimately, denying free - will would be evil, for it would destroy good).

The most overlooked, avoided and denied attribute of God is His hatred of evil people.

In The Gulag Archipelago and other writings he entrenched a standard by which even the most deluded of the deluded could no longer deny the evil of the evil empire.

So if I should take responsibility for events I did not partake in, it's only logical to make atheists realize just how much they deny about the evil caused by atheists.

Not to do so is to abandon and deny the God of justice and Christ Jesus who came into the world to free us from evil like this.

The difficulty with this position is that consistency demanded that you must also say that God determined evil — a position classical theology denied.

The Rechabite movement, although not founded in a mood of reform, clearly did mean, however, for the Rechabites themselves deliverance from current evils by the too easy course of denying civilization.

And Jewish teaching on this subject is extremely ambiguous; unlike some Christian doctrines, Judaism tends to deny evil as a force independent of and opposed to God.

Of course men are corrupted by evil social institutions; but if the social processes fully explain man's behavior, then the freedom which liberalism has claimed for man is denied.

Divine persuasion responds to the problem of evil radically, simply denying that God exercises full control over the world.

«Christians do not deny that governments are evil — deceptive, selfish, arrogant — and often are atrocious; but they are indispensable.»