Sentences with phrase «use gods words»
How dare you use Gods word to push your agenda.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
The decision to move the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association's banking business away from Wells Fargo is based on the bank using corporate advertising to promote lifestyles that are counter to what God's Word teaches.
CNN: My Take: When it comes to «God» in our political platforms, less is more Stephen Prothero, Boston University religion scholar and author of «The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation,» discusses how the Republican and Democratic parties have used God as a ««prop» of our politics» during the 2012 presidential race.
You should know as well as I do Fishon — you are using your own (plus others) knowledge to interpret God's words — admit it.
my greatest concern is this «new teaching» on cussing is that I don't see it throughout the life, ministry or teachings of Jesus or any of the disciples or really any man God uses in the word... What I do hear Him say is that we will be «judged by every careless word» and that's not legalism, that's red letter.
Without using the words, «called by God,» this trilogy vividly paints the picture of what calling is.
And that in response to what I have said about knowing our part in the kingdom, trusting God for justice and the privelidge it is to be part of that, you see different roles for the husband and wife in the relationship, in that it requireds a huband to «woo» to use an old fashioned word, his wife by being sacrificual and that engendering in her the submission in a spirit of mutual submission.
In the face of that, let's not write off a guy like Francis Chan or take him to the principle's office because he forgot to mention the Lamb's book of Life or to use the words «Glory of God» when he said that angels have to cover their eyes in front of God when they are shouting out «Holy!
god (s): Hebrew word # 430 «elohiym (el - o - heem»); plural of OT: 433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: [usages of the word in the] KJV — angels, exceeding, God (gods)- dess, - ly), (very) great, judges, mighgod (s): Hebrew word # 430 «elohiym (el - o - heem»); plural of OT: 433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: [usages of the word in the] KJV — angels, exceeding, God (gods)- dess, - ly), (very) great, judges, mighGod; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: [usages of the word in the] KJV — angels, exceeding, God (gods)- dess, - ly), (very) great, judges, mighGod (gods)- dess, - ly), (very) great, judges, mighty.
I know even some believers are offended by some of the things I write, but to them I'll simply say this: the Word of God is the most powerful thing that exists - both the written word and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the presWord of God is the most powerful thing that exists - both the written word and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the presword and the Living word; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the presword; and it's time to start believing God and to take hold of the ident.ity that He has given you and live and use that ident.ity Lance Wallnau calls it the «believers edge» which unfortunately only 8 % of the body of Christ ever gets into - that rare realm that individuals mature to the place where they have the power to co-create with God and bring the future into the present.
We are called to use superior arms, called to put on the belt of truth, the breastplate of righteousness, the gospel of peace, the shield of faith, and the helmet of salvation and to take up the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God (Eph.
So sad for a government to use words like in God we trust and one nation under God and not wanting to care of it's people.
So when you use your post as a bashing tool against God's people, and mock Christ's resurection from the dead as a comparison to creepy, ungodly, demonic «Halloween» practices, you only show your immaturity in putting your foot in your mouth about things you know nothing about, and your words are of no more value then empty, silly ranting.
Austin is not using the Bible as an excuse, rather helping to provide God's own words by using the Bible instead of his own voice... you're arguing with God not Austin... Good luck.
Whats even more scarier is when Agnostics use the word of God for an excuse to be immoral.
Your use of the word ignorance if translated from the Word of God to Hebrew then Greek then English loving God such that you completely trust the way not any other deceptword ignorance if translated from the Word of God to Hebrew then Greek then English loving God such that you completely trust the way not any other deceptWord of God to Hebrew then Greek then English loving God such that you completely trust the way not any other deception.
hi johnR — agreed in that I have no problem with letting love be love, I am not forcing the issue but rather have found the connection thru study and observation, I am using the word god as a convention, finding words... limited or clumsy... or my ability to use them problematic in explaining so we use the word god....
I would argue that any further knowledge of / about God can not happen if you remain behind the line of belief, whether you can factually prove anything empirically (that you can make God prove Himself at will) or use the vehicle of myth, legend, story or subjective and very personal experiences too extraordinary for words to fully convey.
As fir the poster demanding «credible evidence» of God's existence, there is avreason that the word «faith» is used to describe religious beliefs.
We don't have to use words of theology to talk about God; people who are close to death almost never do.
Do you think a religious person could benefit from» give up using the word «God», «spirituality», «Jesus», «Buddha», «Muhammad», «Christianity» and all the rest.»
Kerry Egan said: «We don't have to use words of theology to talk about God; people who are close to death almost never do.»
As Ms. Egan states,» We don't have to use words of Theology to talk about God.»
Sabio says: Do you think a religious person could benefit from» give up using the word «God», «spirituality», «Jesus», «Buddha», «Muhammad», «Christianity» and all the rest.»
That is a misunderstanding that many people assign to atheism, but has never actually been a part of the words usage (even in ancient times, atheists were those without god, while other terms were used to refer to those that BELIEVED there was no gods).
Like fishon I really enjoyed the teachings and they have helped me to find a lot of freedom in life... however... I admit the word of God can be used to limit people and basically control them.
He placed his hand on a Bible, swore to execute the duties of his office and defend the Constitution, and then spontaneously added words used in the English coronation service: «I swear, so help me God.»
Anyway, here's an observation: you use the words religion, religious and god as often as anyone I know.
Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word «faith» because of it's historical attachment to religious beliefs which pertain to God.
Almost all the stories surrounding Jesus (if he did exist, some scholars say their is no proof of a historical Jesus) were borrowed from earlier myths and used word for word... as well as the rampant literary corruption and forgeries of Biblical Texts... It is also impossible for God to exist in the Christian version or form they created.
«Do not take the name of God and use it in place of a 4 - letter filth word to express disgust.
Considering that most believers in the bible claim that it is the «divinely inspired word of god» and that it is inerrant, how can this article claim that it was merely a mistaken assumption on the part of the authors to falsely claim camels were domesticated and used for transportation and cartage centuries before that actually happened?
The «I think» phrases and their likes must not be used in trasmitting the truth from the Word of God.
«Muslims believe the Quran is the word of God, so holy that people should wash their hands before even touching the sacred book» is really saying something, considering they don't even do that after using the bathroom!
It is used 303 times in the Old Testament of the New International Version, but it is always used in association with the word «LORD» and is the equivalent of the King James Version's «LORD God.»
They might not use the word «mercy» as much as he wants, but they talk extensively about divine love, grace, the sacraments, and charity, all of which pertain to God's mercy, and which they develop into soteriology, the study of the saving action of God.)
ausphor, Do not take the name of God and use it in place of a 4 - letter filth word to express disgust.
That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evgod did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evGod did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.
It is appalling that the word «atonement» is used, but they do NOT believe that Jesus Christ is the ONLY son of God and the ONLY WAY that one can obtain salvation - through His blood that was shed on the cross on Calvary!
The evil one used that same trick thousands of years ago... did God really say that... and doubt in Gods very Words was all it took.
Most importantly, note this: I am a Christian, I'm gay, I'm a recovering alcoholic, I believe in Evolution, I believe the universe is 13 billion years old and that the Earth is 4.5 or so billion years old, I believe man evolved from lower primates and that Adam was the first man who God gave a soul and sentience, I do not believe in hell but I do believe in Satan, I do not believe the Bible is a book of rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I believe Christ was the son of God but I do not believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I do not believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used in the Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spider.
«It's not about same - gender relations — it is about se.xual idolatry and worshipping false gods» ---------- It does refer to certain kinds of idolatry, sure, but you have to remember, all sin is idolatry, therefore when using the word ar.senokoitai, it refers to the idolatry (sinful act) of same gender s.ex.
What bothers me most is that so many of the Scripture references that are used to support the pledges are taken out of context and really have little or nothing to do with the author's theories.I believe God will hold this man and those who abuse God's Word accountable.
@Austin: «you can not use unbelieving logic to explain how God prophetically reveals His word.
you can not use unbelieving logic to explain how God prophetically reveals His word.
In response to a great question from Chuck McKnight on my post Why God Never Punishes Sin, I decided I had better write a short post about the Greek words kolazo and kolasis, specifically in reference to some of the New Testament uses of the word «punishment.»
The dragon uses a flood (many words) to go after God's people.
Heretics like yourself use deceit like your father (Satan) did in the Garden of Eden against Eve and Adam to bend twist and distort the word of God.
Because you do not accept an Abrahamic or even an anthropomorphic God, people will object to anything you say, regardless of the words you use.
I always thought I was the «kind» of atheist who - at the risk of alienating every single believer - used to say, «The Bible is an interesting book, and it might even help some people, but it's NOT the word of God.»