Sentences with phrase «use appellate opinions»

We use cases to illustrate the issues, but we don't use appellate opinions.

Not exact matches

As I wrote here earlier today, beginning in January, Fastcase will collaborate with Public.Resource.Gov to launch the Report of Current Opinions, a weekly release of all federal and state appellate opinions available for anyone to use without restOpinions, a weekly release of all federal and state appellate opinions available for anyone to use without restopinions available for anyone to use without restriction.

Just what is «argle - bargle,» and why would any appellate justice — much less one of Justice Scalia's stature — use such a phrase in a momentous judicial opinion?

For example, Michael Murray used manual review and coding to study the use of parentheticals in 200 federal appellate court briefs and 107 Supreme Court opinions.256

Michael Murray studied rhetorical uses of parentheticals in federal appellate briefs and opinions.110 He drew a cross-sectional sample of briefs filed in several appellate courts from February through July of 2011.

There are so many areas of South Carolina law that could use precedential analysis by our appellate courts that the act of depublishing opinions is almost perverse.

A dozen judges (nine federal judges) have used it, including in opinions for the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court of Kentucky, several federal district courts and state appellate courts.

I review my picks for the year's 10 most important appellate opinions involving the admissibility of expert opinions and the procedural formalities surround their use.

Of those who use LPO, 51 per cent said they used it for legal consultation or opinions, 37 per cent said they used it for agency work, 37 per cent said they used it for trial / appellate work, 36 per cent used it for legal research, 28 per cent said they use it for clerk / paralegal support and 24 per cent said they use it for document review or e-discovery.

According to the facts discussed in the appellate opinion, the lawsuit alleges that the defendant negligently failed to respond to an assistance call made by the patient, resulting in her suffering injuries in a fall while she attempted to use the bathroom unassisted.

[60] In the opinion of the appellate court, the use of such a method recognizes the concerns raised by the commentators and the courts that dollars spent on increased access or shared custody do not necessarily lead to a reduction in expenditures for the recipient parent.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Oregon issued a written opinion in a premises liability case filed against a city employee, holding that the employee was not entitled to immunity under that state's «recreational use» statute.

Litigants are now incentivized to submit more extrinsic evidence, even in cases where they would not have under the old standard, and hope the district judge will use it to craft a favorable opinion with plenty of citations to underlying facts that must be reviewed with deference by the appellate court.

The two parties have gone at in court ever since, resulting last year in the appellate opinion finding that a rights» holder must make «a good faith inquiry» as to whether content would qualify under the Copyright Act's fair use exception before requesting a take - down.