Don't try to
use circular logic on us.
Oh and don't
use circular logic to «prove» he / she / it exists.
But when evaluating the claims of the bible, one must
use circular logic... which isn't logical at all.
fred, you are an utter re-tard... you are
using circular logic to justify your stupidity... you are supposed to outgrow imaginary friends...
Secondly, you are
using circular logic regarding fossil fuels.
You're
using circular logic.
You believe only the «one true» denomination of xtianity can be good and moral
using circular logic.
Also, I don't understand why you think the IPCC is
using circular logic.
The only way it can possibly explain the divergence while supporting the use of the proxy is if one
uses circular logic and assumes that there was no similar temperature increase during the MWP...
Not exact matches
And notice I
used the word «proven» — self supporting
circular logic and claims are not proof.
You do realize that you have contributed nothing original, have
used the same
circular logic, and have repeated your own lame
logic in your complaints, SE44?
You apparently see a seemingly
circular situation that you do not understand, similar to the
circular logic that believers
use when they say «The Babble is the word of some god because it says it is the word of some god.»
Again, this is
circular logic that can be
used to justify anything.
Convinced this
circular logic wasn't providing satisfactory results, Finkelstein pioneered another way forward:
using science, and science alone, to shed light on antiquity, regardless of what the Bible might say.
Preparing students to be college and career ready through the elimination of instructional time that teachers
use to prepare students for college required standardized testing (SAT, ACT) is puzzling, but the taking of instructional time so students can take state mandated standardized tests that claim to measure preparedness for college and career is an exercise in
circular logic.
Waving signs to passersby, «Sor Kitty»
uses the most
circular of
logic to conclude that Madonna is in fact a Latin American artist.
Then (2004) he saw that his model predictions on warming were not happening (they were exaggerated by 2:1), so he
used «
circular logic» to come up with the «hidden in the pipeline» postulation.
Yet Mike continues to object that parameter estimation is
circular logic, for example where he says «No, you
used the formula, but picked parameters to match the temperature.