To the extent that the government can
use its coercive power to define elements of an offense, render a judgment against you (in civil court) and enforce it, as cpast observes, it is government action.
(1) Hare and Madden use the analogy of a parent and child and argue that just as a parent is morally required to use enough extrinsic motivation on his child to protect the child and society so God should
use coercive power to prevent excess evil.
Hence, both Brunner and Niebuhr make much of the need to
use coercive power to secure even an approximate justice in human relations.
(4) The State must
use coercive power to enforce its authority; the Christian can accept some forms of coercion as right and necessary, but at others his conscience is bound to rebel.
But if this is so, how can process theists still maintain that God would not
use coercive power even if it were available?
If God would
use coercive power if it were available, then there are, in principle, times when divine persuasion plus divine coercion would bring about more worthwhile results.
If the Russian government tries to
use the coercive power of law to unite them under the Moscow Patriarchate, will the Russian Orthodox Church vigorously protest and insist on the right of Kyivan Patriarchate parishes to exist, even though it regards them as schismatic?
On the other hand, if the answer is yes — that is, if divine persuasion alone does not maximize human freedom to the extent that such persuasion and divinely approved human coercion does — then it is difficult to see why the process God would not
use coercive power if this were an option.
But it is then very difficult to see why God would want us to
use coercive power or how the classical God of free will theism can be criticized for not coercing.
The Australian Financial Review reported today on proposed new rules to allow the ACCC to
use its coercive powers under s 155 whenever it suspects price signalling has occurred (rather than waiting until it suspects competitors have agreed to collude).
He uses the coercive power of the state to force other people to give him, gratis, the fruits of their labor.
A libel case, like all lawsuits, involves the government's judicial branch
using its coercive power to make you pay money as a result of your speech, based on a law requiring you to pay money for certain kinds of speech.
Not exact matches
The one place where the exception is clearly visible is in the anonymous Letter to Diognetus from the mid-second century CE, where [45] God's
use of persuasive and not
coercive power is affirmed in regard to how God leads wayward humanity to salvation: The invisible God, the Ruler and Creator of all, sent «the Designer and Maker of the universe himself, by whom he created... like a king sending his son who is himself a king.
The easiest access point for most is to say that because God IS love, then God's very nature is loving, and so God's
use of
power is not
coercive - it is persuasive (almost seductive).
Many are reminded of abusive church members who have
used love as
coercive leverage to garner control and
power.
This simple point helps to reveal an ambiguous
use of the word «
coercive»: (1) Sometimes the speaker seems to be saying or implying that
coercive power is that
power which is successful, strong, efficient, and competent.
During his homily at the Mass pro eligendo Romano Pontifice [for the election of the Roman Pontiff] on April 18, 2005, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger cautioned his fellow - cardinals that John Paul II's successor would have to deal with an emerging «dictatorship of relativism» throughout the western world: the
use of
coercive state
power to impose an agenda of dramatic moral deconstruction on all of society.
This opened the way to affirming the
use of
coercive power by humans as well.
And if and when force is
used, let us not hallow it by thinking of God as essentially such
coercive power.
If by
power we intend to signify, as most often is intended, the
use of
coercive measures whether these be overt or subtle and hidden, then it would seem that to ascribe such a quality to God as His chief characteristic — as in fact, if not in word, is suggested when people talk as did my questioner — is a denial of the point of Christ's disclosure of God.
Let us first assume that a perfect being would only
use persuasive
power and, thus, that since the God of process theism is perfect,
coercive power would never be
used even if it were available.
Likewise, it in no sense necessarily follows from the fact that God can not coerce in any sense that God thinks that
coercive power ought never be
used by those who can exert it.
If God believes that some coercion is a useful and morally acceptable means of achieving a desired end, then there appears to be no reason why such
coercive power would not be
used if it were available.
It would seem, rather, that we, mirroring the divine ranking of values, should also refrain from all
coercive uses of
power.
This is why God sometimes approves of (lures us toward) coercion on the human level even though such
coercive power would never be
used by God even if it were available.
If this is what process theists believe, then we might well expect them to criticize any
use of
coercive power on the human level.
The final question, as to the Christian conscience and the
coercive use of military
power by one State upon another, we shall defer to the next chapter which will be devoted centrally to this issue.
This
use of
power may appear more bloody, but it is less
coercive and less destructive than the
power to prevent change.
(1) If there were a good and powerful God, he would in some respects allow freedom
using only persuasive
power; but if he were good and powerful, he would
use more
coercive power to prevent destructive evil than is apparently being
used in the world.
(4) In the absence of an explanation why God does not
use more
coercive power and is not more effective in his persuasion we may as reasonably conclude that there is a great evil persuasive
power behind phenomena in the world as that there is a great
power persuading toward the good.
I find myself in fundamental agreement with Cobb that the really worthwhile
power that God should exercise is persuasive, and I would meet the first criticism by saying that God should not
use more
coercive power than is apparently being exercised in the world.
But
coercive power used for domination is more costly and less likely to prevail than non-
coercive power.
Above all, the
coercive power of our legal system, already stretched thin, must be
used with caution and chiefly against evils about which there is something like universal consensus.
But there was even an effort in that legislation that was being proposed by the government to ensure that we would see
coercive powers used against workers rather than
used against employers who were intentionally underpaying those workers or other workers in the labour market.
It is unfortunate that anyone who holds contrary position to that of the ruling Npp is subjected to unnecessary intimidation and harassment with the
use of
coercive apparatus of
power.
This appeared to demand a substantial
use of the
coercive power of the state.
She said new
powers to tackle domestic abuse, including controlling or
coercive behaviour, were effective but were «not being
used anywhere near as systematically as they could be».
It seems wrong that the
coercive power of the state should be
used to force an unconsented transfer from A to B where the operation of the open market has failed to generate the required bargain by means of normal arm's length dealing.
While the tribunal may
use its new
coercive powers to make parties attend mediation and produce documents it can not force parties to mediate.
What might the concept of /
use of
Coercive Power have to do with how real estate purchases / sales are sometimes influenced / transacted?
Those with the fear - of - failure - syndrome firmly embedded in their brains (most newbies) are ripe for the infiltration of the
use of
Coercive Power of Fear psychological tactics into their arsenals of influence, and that is not a good thing ORE..