When
we use doctrinal statements to determine the eternal destiny of other people — which is something only Jesus should do — it is not long before we get the idea that if a person is reprobate and a heretic, it is better to send them on their way to hell, then to let them stick around and lead others astray.
I will begin to look at this issue tomorrow as we continue this series about how some churches throughout history have
used doctrinal statements to damage and even kill others.
Not exact matches
Despite how
doctrinal statements can be misused and abused, I do think there are several good
uses for them.
In today's blogging world, you have to be somewhat provocative to garner attention... As I mentioned above, I do believe in the value of
doctrinal statements, but in a much different way than how they are
used by most churches.
«The most beautiful names of God» that appear in Muslim devotion have been
used by Muslim theologians to express God's attributes even though they are more expressions of praise than
doctrinal statements.
He urged his readers not to concentrate on the
doctrinal statements which they mocked, but on a «sense and taste for the Infinite», or, in a phrase that he often
used, on «a feeling of absolute dependence.»
Despite how hard I have been on
doctrinal statements in recent posts, I do think there are several good
uses for them.
However, just because a
doctrinal statement can be
used to restrict who is placed in a position of leadership in a church or ministry, I strongly discourage the
use of
doctrinal statements as a means of restricting who can attend or participate with the church or ministry in its services and functions.
Aside from these three good
uses of
doctrinal statements, can you think of any others?
I hope that if / when the book comes out, my point will be more clear —
Doctrinal Statements are good when
used in their proper place, but just as with anything, they can be very dangerous if
used improperly.
Yes, in some future posts, I will praise the
doctrinal statements, and suggest some positive
uses for them.
I am not sure how long you have been reading this blog, but this post here is actually part of a series that has been going on for about three weeks so far, in which I look at at the
use and abuse of
doctrinal statements.
There are
uses for
doctrinal statements, and while one of the
uses is to provide guidance and boundaries in our biblical interpretation, there are pitfalls to this approach, especially when we include some of the later
doctrinal statements of church history.
First, a written
doctrinal statement is only as good as the character of the people who are supposed to be
using it.
First, I could continue on to the next chapter in Close Your Church for Good., in which I will challenge the
use of
Doctrinal Statements.
There are, of course, numerous Scriptural passages and theological arguments that are
used to defend such a
use of
doctrinal statements.
Many churches or denominations won't allow people to become members unless they
use these words in their description of Scripture... Oddly, I've never heard of a church or denomination that asked people to affirm a
doctrinal statement like this: The purpose of Scripture is to equip God's people for good works.
We are well
used to such Evangelicals, sharing with them the
doctrinal and moral essentials of classical Christianity, a commitment to the Augustinian patrimony of the West, recent remarkable joint
statements on justification, and much common work for the sanctity of life, Biblical standards of sexual morality, social justice, environmental responsibility and world peace.