Sentences with phrase «use false reviews»

In some instances, online traffic schools may use false reviews to make their online reputation look a little better than it is, and this can mislead you into thinking that you're choosing a great school option, when that isn't really the case.

Not exact matches

The word «rogue» entered the lexicon of Alberta politics after Auditor General Merwan Saher reviewed Alison Redford's use of government aircraft and found that somebody booked «false passengers» onto government flights in order to block seats and then unbooked them so that Ms Redford and her entourage could have the plane all to themselves.

Virginia Burrus, in her article «The Heretical Woman as Symbol in Alexander, Athanasius, Epiphanius, and Jerome,» Harvard Theological Review, 84:3 (1991) 229 - 248, points out how her analysis has indicated that the sources examined «speak loudly and clearly of the preoccupations of the men who articulated their orthodox identity through the use of woman as a symbol of the threatening forces of sexuality, social chaos, and false belief.»

The practice has been used by businesses to manipulate social media users or online shoppers, by having one paid associate post false reviews on web sites about products for sale.

We think of sock - puppet reviews as those written by someone using multiple accounts set up under false names for the purposes of generating numerous positive reviews of his own work, or scathing reviews of a competitor's work.

Some authors have also used «sock puppets» — false identities that they create themselves — to post good reviews they wrote for their own books.

ICFE DCCS ® Independent Study Guide Table of Contents Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to oversee debt collectors Collection agencies and junk debt buyers - Mini-Miranda What to do if a debtor is contacted about past debts Sample cease and desist letter Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Summary from the CFPB Debt that is covered Debt Collectors that are covered Debt Collectors that are NOT covered Debt Collection for Active and Veteran Military Personnel Communications connected with debt collection When, where and with who communications is permitted Ceasing Communication with the consumer Communicating with third parties Validation of debts Prohibited Practices: Harassing or abusive Practices False or misleading representations Unfair Practices Multiple debts Legal Actions by debt collectors Furnishing certain deceptive forms Civil liability Defenses CFPB / FTC staff's commentary on the FDCPA Common debt collector violations How to document a collector's abusive behavior What to do if a collector breaks the law How collectors are trained - examples of collector training courses FDCPA Sample Exam from ACA for Collectors How collectors are using Social Medias in collections Dealing with creditors and third party collectors Other factors for a debtor in collection: Credit reports and scores Reviewing credit reports with debtors - Permissible uses Rules about credit decisions and notices Debtor education about credit reports and FICO scores Specialty Report Providers Rules to protect consumers in credit card debt How to read and understand credit reports How to make changes or dispute accuracy Freezing Credit Files FCRA / FACTA Provisions of ID Theft victims How credit scoring works The Credit Card Accountability and Disclosure Act Credit Rules CFPB rules establish strong protections for homeowners facing foreclosure Other Resources

Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright isfalse advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright isFalse Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.

In our experience, using e-discovery software that does not properly tokenize CJK characters to find responsive documents not only can miss key documents but also result in up to 50 percent false - positive identification, which leads to excessive review costs.

Notwithstanding Google's content policies, some reviewers use fake names and / or post reviews that are false and defamatory.

With the increasing use of social media and review sites like Yelp, it is easier than ever for disgruntled patients to attack your reputation by leaving negative false reviews about you and your practice.

He also took a look at the site and marketing material, noting that it «makes use of affiliate links to spread quickly with potential false testimonials and reviews» and «uses colorful, exaggerated language.

Respondents are using the Domain Names to attract Internet users to their website, where the visitor is given the false impression that Respondents hold a registered trademark for «Realtor Review».

Respondents» use of the longstanding mark REALTOR in their name «Realtor Review» — especially with the false symbol ® on their website — to identify and distinguish services which, in the USPTO's view, are similar to those offered by Complainant, is not, in the Panel's view, legitimate in the circumstances.