Not exact matches
A proposal unveiled by the Clinton Administration last week would consolidate 23 separate vocational -
education programs into a single grant, giving states greater flexibility over how to
use the
federal dollars.
«I can tell you this — if you gave the American people a choice today between
using federal dollars to renovate and build new public schools or
using public tax
dollars to pay for private school vouchers, there would be no question how the American people would vote,» asserted U.S. Secretary of
Education Richard W. Riley in a speech made when the report was released.
Education lobbyists say HR 2086 would conceivably allow school districts to
use federal dollars to pay for vouchers for private school tuition or to pay private companies to provide school services.
They have consistently
used federal dollars to create programs that benefit a limited group of individuals and institutions of higher
education with no evidence that this approach benefits society, or even the targeted individuals.
Equitable Services = Specific, Effective & Allowable The intent of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act is that districts
use their
federal grant
dollars to design programs and services that meet the individual needs of teachers and students in non-public schools.
In
education, the medical research model —
using federal dollars to build a knowledge base within a community of experts — has manifestly failed.
During this reauthorization process, NSBA has worked closely with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to advocate for a modernized
education law that affirms the importance of local governance, protects
federal investments in Title I grants for disadvantaged students, and prevents the diversion of public tax
dollars for private
use.
has an amendment to establish
education savings accounts for military families
using federal impact aid
dollars.
During the reauthorization process, there was a collective effort by NSBA and local school board members to advocate before Members of Congress for a modernized
education law that underscores the importance of local governance, protects
federal investments in Title I grants for disadvantaged students, and prevents the diversion of public tax
dollars for private
use.
Funding for college work - study programs would be cut in half, public - service loan forgiveness would end and hundreds of millions of
dollars that public schools could
use for mental health, advanced coursework and other services would vanish under a Trump administration plan to cut $ 10.6 billion from
federal education initiatives, according to budget documents obtained by The Washington Post.
At that time, U.S. Secretary of
Education Arne Duncan threatened to withhold millions of
dollars in
federal funding during a dispute over which tests to give students and which measurements to
use.
«As much as I want to see every single child in America have school choice, it is just not appropriate for the
federal government to be
using new
dollars and new programs to push states in that direction,» said Lindsey Burke, an
education policy expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Collectively, level funding through the appropriations process and the cuts of sequestration have exacerbated the need for school districts to raise taxes or
use local budget
dollars to cover an ever - growing share of the
federal contribution to special
education.
But the most significant long - term change is that the new law devolves responsibility for how
federal education dollars are
used to the states.
Flexibility gives state
education leaders the option to put
federal dollars to better
use in accomplishing important educational goals.
Credit: Alison Yin / EdSource (2017) The U.S. Department of
Education has cited substantive flaws in California's plan detailing how it will improve low - performing schools and
use billions of
dollars of
federal... Read More
This is a fact that the U.S. Supreme Court made clear more than a century ago in Hunter v. Pittsburgh and has since been affirmed by the
federal government through No Child, which holds states accountable for the quality of
education provided with the
use of
federal dollars.
«The group's proposed reforms correspond to criteria the
federal government will
use to award additional
education stimulus
dollars on a competitive basis starting this fall.»
California placed a year - long moratorium on the
use of Common Core exams to make «accountability» decisions, a modest step that drew threats from Duncan to withhold hundreds of millions of
dollars in
federal education aid.
Alexandria, Va. (July 14, 2015)- As the rewrite of No Child Left Behind progresses, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) continues to strongly oppose authorizing the
use of
federal dollars for private
education.
The National
Education Association expressed satisfaction that the bill maintains the disaggregation of student performance data and provides states more flexibility in their
use of
federal dollars, but displeasure of the prescriptive nature of the bill's school turnaround proposals.
What I would argue is that a much larger share of the
federal education research
dollars... should be devoted to helping states begin to
use the data that they've been accumulating to start evaluating their own programs and policies.
H.R. 1891, otherwise known as «The State and Local Funding Flexibility Act,» is designed to allow states and local school districts maximum flexibility in their
use of
federal education dollars.
Legalize and Regulate Marijuana WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume marijuana and other cannabis products; WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of
dollars spent on ineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive congestion in our judicial system; WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been recommended by the 1969 - 72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical
Use of Drugs, the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs; WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang - related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling — a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada's marijuana industry; BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practic
Use of Drugs, the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special Committee on the Non-Medical
Use of Drugs; WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang - related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling — a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada's marijuana industry; BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practic
Use of Drugs; WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang - related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling — a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada's marijuana industry; BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and
use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practic
use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and
education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana
use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practic
use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant
federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.