Sentences with phrase «use formation»

Current systems use the formation of sound waves followed by the absorption of light which means that the tissues must adequately absorb the laser light.

We counter-attack very well (judging by Europa League matches), so if we use this formation our defence is much tighter and we have a strong attack.

Unlike most other teams who use this formation though, Semin's team is highly dynamic, and players like Manuel Fernandes, Jefferson Fárfan and the Miranchuk twins are allowed to wander around the pitch in pursuit of open spaces.

While this is the ground where Antonio Conte first switched Chelsea to the 3 -4-3 system which won the title, they aren't expected to use that formation here.

They could use that formation again, because they are more accustomed to it and Ozil usually has less pressure when playing at home:

Arsenal can use any formation or put six defenders in front of the goalkeeper, the result would be similar, because the players» qualities are simply standard.

Arsenal could use any formation, but it will not improve them, as long as the system, the board and the management do not change.

I love your starting lineup I wish you were manager lol Any sensible manager would use your formation but alas we lack one.

Also why use a formation with no no10 when we have so dam many of them.

Why not use a formation that exploits their obvious weaknesses; along the wings in the fullback position....

Wenger use 343 formation now, he should buy players that suit with 343, not to force players to adept, or use formation that suit with players we already have.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We need a goal scoring number 10 to effectively use this formation.

Wenger doesn't use a formation that utilizes number 10 position.

Arsene's not an idiot, the two best defences in this league happen to be first and second place, and they use that formation.

That why I said, Wenger was lucky wilshere injured if not he won't use that formation, he will use wilshere and carzola will be on the bench.

The big thing about that was Hazard was fine either going down the wing or attacking centrally and Mata was fine crossing, he was Chelsea's set piece taker so they could afford to use the formation.

I agree that maybe Arsenal will play better if they use this formation correctly.

Since we have a weak DM, why not use a formation that doesn't use a DM?

What the point have a playmaker, if y do nt use formation that suit for a playmaker.

My brother called it from the moment Arsenal started using this formation, and we've both been dying to see it since: «Per would be perfect for the center of the three CBs» and it was spot on.

maybe wenger should have bought so and so over so and so, maybe he could of used this formation rather than that formation but overall I don't think we couldn't of done much better unless we gave in the «sugar daddy» way of things with the shady usmanov a Russian oligarch notorious for involvement in dubious politics and business.

Arsenal could challenge for the title next season if they keep using this formation and keeps Sanchez.

Giroud — too slow, too inconsistent, no good enough to link - up play and he's symptomatic of when the Wenger plan truly fell off the rails... he obviously has some great skills but they would make far more sense on a team that was fighting for much lesser objectives because we have never used a formation that works to his strengths (2 up top like France) and as such he should be sold to the highest bidder regardless of who it is

I think Lucas» primary role at Arsenal will be as a striker, but as Wenger seems to want to stick with using a formation that sees one sole striker supported by two wingers, I still think Giroud still stands on having the better chance of playing in that spot.

I seem to recall people saying they were going to whoop us last season as well and we used this formation then.

So to answer the question of this article is more complicated than to just say one formation or the other because it is premature to consider using a formation without holistically considering the total circumstances under which the formation will be deployed.

I think we would be playing to our strengths if we used that formation

I see our priorities in the transfer market using this formation being a new left and right wing back, a center back, a defensive midfielder and a striker.

1) Do we have the necessary players who fit a proposed formation that can maximise its strengths as opposed to using a formation that we shoe horns players into and force them to play out of position?

The first one is the 4 -3-1-2 with Isco playing in a free role behind Ronaldo and Benzema.Zidane used this formation in the first leg vs PSG as well as Juve and he will probably use it vs Bayern in the first leg as well.The formation has been heavily criticized though by a lot of Madridistas.

Munich used this formation last year and Wenger seems keen on the way Pep uses players.

Conte made the decision to disband the previously favoured 4 -2-3-1 after the loss to Arsenal this term, and his 3 -4-2-1 has worked amazingly, so why cant Wenger look at using another formation?

Before signing Welbeck, I would have said that we should have most definitely used this formation and also mentioned it in many comments.

When we're at home against the bottom twelve clubs I don't see him using this formation.

Chelsea yes uses that formation but u do nt see them using it in big games.

Wenger has used this formation before.

Use the formations used against Galatasaray and Villa.

Kemar Roofe seemed to partner Lasogga up front in more of a 4 -4-2 formation against Millwall, and while the club hasn't really used that formation that much this season, it might bring out the best in the club in the absence of Samu Saiz.

Deploying the 4 -4-2 with Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Ola Kamara up top worked at Toyota Park, and it wouldn't be surprising if Sigi Schmid used the formation again vs. the Five Stripes.

Juventus has only «officially» used the formation once, at least according to WhoScored.com.

The first one up is the 4 -3-3, probably Lambert's most used formation during his time at Villa.

The 4 -2-3-1 formation is statically the most used formation in the Premier League and it has been used by Everton even before Roberto Martinez walked into Goodison Park.

For the first time ever, the study used this formation of novel enhancer regions to describe the selection of enhancers and the progression of the activation from transcription factor binding to histone acetylation and eRNA transcription, finally leading to the mono - and dimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1 / 2).

I might write an article about them at some point, but that does not mean that I will use the formations for my trading.

In those, you take command over thousands of units and have to lead them to victory by wisely using formations, character abilities and varying landscapes.

It used the formation of what was called the Open Handset Alliance, which included phone makers like HTC and Motorola, chip manufacturers such as Qualcomm and Texas Instruments, and carriers including T - Mobile.

Not exact matches

At times controllers are using Reapers, Predators or both «combined in a formation» as a more efficient way of using their sensors, according to Lt. Col. Eric Winterbottom, chief of the Commander's Action Group, U.S. Air Forces Central Command.

The radar that Cruise uses to detect other cars on the road costs the company between $ 100 and $ 200 — it's similar to the Doppler radar your local news channel uses to bounce a signal off cloud formations and detect weather patterns.

Since scientists know the size, weight, and shape of the objects that smashed into the Martian surface, they can use this information to better understand the nature of crater formation on Mars.