While it remains unclear whether Governor Dannel Malloy's new education funding scheme includes a «money follows the child formula» that would force local districts to
use local tax dollars to subsidize the privately owned and operated charter schools in their communities, the Governor's budget does shovel even more state taxpayer funds to the charter school industry.
Not exact matches
Over a decade ago, New York State and
local governments
used more than a billion
dollars» worth of
tax breaks and other incentives to lure GlobalFoundries to Saratoga County.
Other reforms Hawkins is calling for include a windfall
tax on pharmaceutical companies» opioid wealth, a surtax on high -
dollar pass - through income from LLCs and other pass - through vehicles, a clawback of the new federal
tax cuts if not
used to increase workers» pay, home rule for
local income
taxes, and
tax credit «circuit breakers» to protect low - to - moderate income tenants and homeowners from unaffordable rents and property
taxes.
Colorado and Florida both recently increased the share of
local tax dollars that charter schools can access, though they
used different strategies to achieve their goals.
During this reauthorization process, NSBA has worked closely with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to advocate for a modernized education law that affirms the importance of
local governance, protects federal investments in Title I grants for disadvantaged students, and prevents the diversion of public
tax dollars for private
use.
Many families support voucher programs, as it allows them to
use tax dollars they pay for education, but aren't able to
use otherwise if they elect to attend a school other than the
local private school.
During the reauthorization process, there was a collective effort by NSBA and
local school board members to advocate before Members of Congress for a modernized education law that underscores the importance of
local governance, protects federal investments in Title I grants for disadvantaged students, and prevents the diversion of public
tax dollars for private
use.
Collectively, level funding through the appropriations process and the cuts of sequestration have exacerbated the need for school districts to raise
taxes or
use local budget
dollars to cover an ever - growing share of the federal contribution to special education.
The fact that the Snyder plan does nothing to stop districts from
using property
tax dollars to fund their operations belie such
local control arguments.
While awaiting conference proceedings to begin, NSBA will continue to work with potential conferees to ensure that Congress passes an education bill that reaffirms
local governance, invests in Title I programs, and excludes vouchers, tuition
tax credits, or other means of authorizing the
use of public
dollars for private education.
Sending
tax dollars to schools that lack
local supervision is not an appropriate
use of taxpayer funds and it weakens educational opportunities for millions of children.
This flips the norm established more than 35 years ago with Proposition 13, the landmark property
tax limit, when the state became the school funding distributor as well as decider, largely dictating how
locals could
use the
dollars.
*
Use of
tax dollars by federal, state and
local governments to install costly renewable energy facilities or purchasing «green» electricity premium prices.
«At a time when state and
local governments are cutting services to the bone, it makes no sense to force them to
use tax - payer
dollars to dole out unearned profits to Wall Street,» said AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee.