Of course, it's common for non-lawyers to
use nominalizations and related wordy phrases.
Not exact matches
Both results, though, were skewed toward the «Flabby» end of the scale because I needed to
use the word
nominalization multiple times in the samples because of the purpose of the post.
So why do legal writers
use so many
nominalizations containing - ion words?
Except for passive voice, the
use of
nominalizations (a / k / a buried verbs) is perhaps the best sign of poor legal writing.