Sentences with phrase «use number of points»

Actually, it is just like using a trailing percent, except you use number of points.

The only thing you change from the trailing percent is instead of using a percentage to trail your stop you are actually using the number of points.

The only difference between trailing percent and trailing points is in place of using a percentage to trail your stop you are using the number of points.

Not exact matches

As a number of critics have pointed out, using AMP would come at a certain cost.

Use a simple system with round numbers of points equating to a particular gift or a percent off the customer's next purchase.

Using splashy big numbers of capital market debt deals is foolish when those deals are refinancing previous ones at rates hundreds of basis points cheaper.

A number of fan have pointed out the warped horizon and wavy lines in the foreground, which indicate the use of Photoshop.

You might be working on gaining an essential contract or be just about to close a deal and your client asks for your company registration number — At this point of course you can register a new company but, how much easier would it be to use a readily available genuine company number.

The app lets you earn «Sweatcoins,» or points based on the number of steps you take in a day, which you can then use to buy a limited number of specific goods that Sweatcoin has made available — like a Fitbit tracker, fitness classes, or subscriptions to apps designed to help you eat healthier.

Horing seems confident that it can, pointing to the growing number of coders who use its services across the globe.

When calculating the break - even point, use the number of pieces that you would expect to be able to mail consistently after the rollout (this will likely be more than the 500 our client mailed in his test).

This selling point appears to be backed up by the numbers: Concur is currently in use in over 90 countries by thousands of companies, and, according to Newell, the company is currently pushing strongly in Canada (which is why they polled Canadians).

She points out the discrepancies between the amount of time people claim to spend on work during a week, for example, and the number of hours that studies using time diaries actually show we spend making productive contributions to our jobs.

Stéfane Marion, chief economist at National Bank Financial, noted earlier this month Canadian factories currently are using 82 % of their production capacity, a historically strong number that is seven percentage points higher than the corresponding capacity - utilization rate in the United States.

Once she can start aggregating data from her patients with data from other doctors who are using the app, she will have a huge number of data points that she can use to track everything from the efficacy of the surgery in certain patient populations, to which doctors might get the best outcomes.

The poll was conducted using an online panel of 1,021 Canadians from Dec. 7 to Dec. 12 and is considered accurate within 3.5 percentage points for the national numbers, with higher margins of error for regional breakdowns.

They can also be used to describe how the overall market is performing: you'll often hear how the Dow Jones or S&P gained a certain number of points in a day or how the markets are recovering from a loss.

These points can be transferred to a number of hotel and airline loyalty programs, used directly for airline tickets, or redeemed... read more

«A great card for anyone who doesn't mind the limited number of places you can use Stash Points at — just 150 hotels nationwide, as of writing this review.»

Ultimate Rewards (earned from the Sapphire Reserve / Preferred) can be used at a fixed - value when booking through UltimateRewards.com but can also be worth more when transferring to travel partners like Hyatt or United where you pay a fixed number of points in those programs which are not dependent on the cash cost of that room / flight otherwise.

A quick search on Google will point you to a number of tools you can use for rapid prototyping or charting of user flow.

When you take the high value of Starpoints into account, the sign - up bonus on this card becomes a lot bigger than the sheer number of points would suggest: Earn 25,000 Starpoints ® after you use your new Card to make $ 3,000 in purchases within the first 3 months.

How many miles you earn will be determined by the number of Marriott Rewards points you use.

The Ultimate Rewards points you earn through the Chase Sapphire Preferred ®, on the other hand, can be used as statement credit, or traveled to a number of different partner programs (including Marriott, Southwest Airlines, and more).

The problem is, it's tricky to preserve this balance while also growing the number of users (especially to the point where average people can use the system to purchase coffee or run applications).

Brokers will display this in a number of different ways, sometimes using visuals or graphics to better illustrate the point.

The former allows you to transfer points to a number of popular airline loyalty programs, and the latter allows you to use miles as statement credits.

Since you'll use the same number for the rewards you earn from both your business and personal credit cards, all of your points and miles will be pooled.

Rather than waiting around for a hypothetical and unlikely legal scenario to play out, our efforts would be better spent working to decrease the number of unwanted pregnancies using the tools we already have... which brings me to my next point.

Those who use this tactic try to «blow you away» by the sheer number of verses they can quote which they feel proves their point.

Various procedures would have been used by him in order to revise his text, the most important being the insertion, at various places in the original manuscript, of passages expressing his new vision, at times a few lines, at times even whole sections, with the intention of leading his eventual readers to interpret the whole context in the light of the point of view of the inserted materials.3 Ford proposes that Whitehead did modify his original manuscript accordingly a number of times before its publication in 1929, with the result that the final version of Process and Reality is actually the outcome of the superposition of texts from successive redactional strata over the original stratum made by the manuscript of the summer of l927.4

It is, at least, apparent that the debates about humanitarian intervention by military force in the last decade, about the creation of international criminal tribunals in a number of cases, about the idea of a state's «universal jurisdiction» in cases of violations of the Genocide Convention or other «crimes against humanity,» about how far the global war on terror may proceed without violating the rights of states, and most recently, about the United - States - led use of force against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, have all raised important points of positive and customary international law, and that in every one of these cases the outcome remains unsettled.

And the number of logically possible groupings would be nondenumerable, for it would be logically possible to use each point as a center for a possible grouping and to include more or fewer points in each grouping.

It's used as a bizarre entry point to the faith, as described above, largely because it features copious numbers of animals.

Johann Lang, in a letter to Spalatin in March 1516 (shortly before he was appointed to Erfurt) referring to the large numbers of students who were dropping out of the courses on scholastic philosophy and theology, and explaining the rebirth of biblical studies (he used the Renaissance type word reviviscere) and the new Strong interest in antiquae scriptores, identified the phenomenon by pointing to the international influence of Reuchlin and Erasmus, «men of great erudition and integrity».

Using this iPad application, Carlin Group's representatives can verify distribution and speed - to - shelf, identify out - of - stock items, verify code numbers, track point - of - sale displays and provide real - time validation.

He cited studies by the industry and a number of talking points used by lobby groups, trying to discredit those with legitimate concerns, like Cornucopia and its members.

Just use that number and divide by how many slices you get out of the bread (slice it first, or estimate from mid point and quarter point of loaf, taking into account that end slices and middle slices might vary a little).

Note 2: I used a 5 - point star nozzle, but feel free to experiment with star nozzles with different numbers of points to get the effect you want.

In a good number of internet discussions, you will find arguments about the use or non-use of EVOO in cooking that focus on the issue of smoke point.

It became a point of honour for me NOT to use that number.

You can make these one after the other and then move on to sourdough, you can make these breads a number of times - either to build your confidence or to enjoy the breads again and again - or you can use these as a starting point to making other yeasted breads.

Wenger has mostly used the second string squad at the start of any season to great effect, most teams aren't at full strength or match fit and he plays that Wengerball numbers game, throwing in squad players who are fit and raring to go whilst the first team get ready, we'll win 2 of our 3 opening games and he'd rather that than splash 100m on 3 players and get the same amount of points.

Again, results improve with the use of «Number of Bets» and selecting dogs > 3 points.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

By using this forum, Facebook and Twitter etc it's possible to achieve this and get sufficient numbers to attend it but, and I refer back to my initial point, are any fans really that motivated to give up an afternoon of their life or is it simply too much of a commitment?

First of all I would like to say that I think Arsenal will come away from Vicarage Road next weekend with all three points, especially as the team should look a lot more like the Arsenal we are used to, with Olivier Giroud leading the attack and Mesut Ozil doing what he does best in the number 10 position, but there will be a lot more pressure on the players to beat Watford than is ideal.

Like Greg Norman before him, Price began lobbying the PGA Tour and commissioner Tim Finchem shortly after the 2013 matches to reduce the total number of points from 34 to 28, which is the same number used at both the Ryder Cup and Solheim Cup.

Even though there are a number of potentially difficult games ahead, using the prediction gadget on the Birmingham Mail web site, my calculations have Wolves winning the league with 103 points with draws at Leeds, Cardiff and Villa....

Spurred by the Sports Insights tweet and using the Bet Labs database, I pulled each team's against - the - spread record since 2003 (that is how far back our data goes) looking for the number of games they were underdogs of 5 or more points.