Sentences with phrase «use of actual science»

In fact, the group serves as little more than a mouthpiece for Big Carbon and the modern Republican Party which, largely thanks to Citizens United in 2010, now eschews the use of actual science in the public sphere.

Not exact matches

There are more stories out of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questionof the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questionOf course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.

Could it be that the two sides are more like each other than we care to admit??? LOL, why didn't they put the money they used to put up the billboard to prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is a myth and nothing in the bible actual happened since it's all about reason and science so we can put all the speculation to bed.

AIS data have important applications in conservation science including describing baseline vessel use of a maritime area, assessing or modeling actual or potential environmental impacts, and monitoring environmental compliance.

Lisa Castaneda's Forget Aperture, This is My Test Chamber — Data and Statistics Final Project is a great example of how teachers can use this powerful game - based learning tool to engage students in the actual doing of math and science.

Each of the sample tests Edinformatics designed, use actual questions from the TIMSS (Third International Math and Science Survey).

[9] Among their concerns, are the use of potential rather than actual impacts, and the validity of the underlying science — as well as the overall lack of rigor involved in developing such estimates.

Versus the typical climate science example where they don't use any actual data — they just make it up and ignore the actual data, or they use some climate model simulation of a fantasy climate.

There is a disconnect between Idso's defense and Doney's offense which was itself very measured in its use of language and imminence, so it looks like posting Idso somewhat misses the target of the actual debate within the science.

The actual history of this subject is far worse than I thought, to use a «Climate Science» term of art.

However from what I have read and what I have seen, much of the actual science seems to be flawed, and is heavily weighted on assumptions which are in turn based on assumptions, based on sketchy data, in which much of the methods used are questionable.

«I am afraid there are people who want to stop the economic growth, the rise in the standard of living (though not their own) and the ability of man to use the expanding wealth, science and technology for solving the actual pressing problems of mankind, especially of the developing countries.»

Since this is 7Watts / m ^ 2 higher than the actual measured average and is more than a full Watt / m ^ 2 higher than any value measured in the past 31 years, if one were to criticize someone for violating science protocol it would not be Roy Spencer whose basic data and computations are readily available for scrutiny by anyone who whishes to do so; it is Trenberth for using contrived values for OLR in his energy balance computations instead of using actual physical data measured directly by satellites.

The primary goal of the EdGCM (Educational Global Climate Model) Project is to enhance the quality of climate - change science teaching and learning at the high school level through broader access to actual GCMs, and to assist teachers by providing the appropriate technology, materials and support to use these research - quality climate models effectively in the classroom.

It has been used before to undermine the actual sound science being used to inform public policy, which is my area of study.

«It would seem that Richard Muller has served as a useful foil for the Koch Brothers, allowing them to claim they have funded a real scientist looking into the basic science, while that scientist — Muller — props himself up by using the «Berkeley» imprimatur (U.C. Berkeley has not in any way sanctioned this effort) and appearing to accept the basic science, and goes out on the talk circuit, writing Op - Eds, etc. systematically downplaying the actual state of the science, dismissing key climate - change impacts and denying the degree of risk that climate change actually represents.

Presenting such alternative figures confuses and undermines the public understanding of the actual science, which is an understanding about the driving mechanisms of sea level rise: thermal expansion of ocean water, melting of mountain glaciers and complex dynamics of large ice sheets — in correspondence again with projected temperature rise, that is in turn a product of projected rises of greenhouse gas concentrations using calculated estimates of climate sensitivity, together creating a net disturbance in Earth's energy balance, the very root cause of anthropogenic climate change.

And that's illustrated if you compare how «science - based» and «science - denier» blogs discuss right about any climate - related topic, from actual atmospheric temperature development to its physical manifestations, like sea level rise (see the chart in the middle of this piece) and social and ecological consequences of climate change — including at some point the fate of iconic mammal species that use sea ice as hunting grounds.

I can not imagine any science PhD (outside of the social «sciences,» anyway) every claiming that eyeballing noisy data was as good as (or maybe better than) actual data analysis using statistics.

I guess I'd add that this is understandable, given that the denier camp really doesn't have much actual science to use as ammunition or to build their arguments on, and thus they tend to wage their campaign by cherrypicking data, or seeking to attack narrow and often out - of - context passages found in scientific papers or in simplified postings about those papers found on sites like Skeptical Sscience to use as ammunition or to build their arguments on, and thus they tend to wage their campaign by cherrypicking data, or seeking to attack narrow and often out - of - context passages found in scientific papers or in simplified postings about those papers found on sites like Skeptical ScienceScience.

An example of this in the climate change war is the use of temperature which is a poor metric for the actual science which requires enthalpy; or such a claim automatically has assumptions, stated or not, that can be challenged.

This may be totally off, since I know squat about climate science & the high - powered statistical programs used, but when there is a dearth of data in the social sciences (not enough to give low enough p values on correlations & regressions, simply due to small numbers of data, which is sometimes due to loading in too many control variables), we sometimes turn to chi - square & log - linear analysis to see if actual data reveal patterns incongruent with expected patterns.

Furthermore the concept of atmospheric heat engine is not ofter used directly in actual science as far as know, it's rather a way used to help understanding one important aspect of the Earth system.

So its going to turn into an area where any true discussion based on the science of the specific aspect — ice free Artic, sea level rise (when, where and how much)-- will be missing and any chance of actual education will be gone if the standard «opponents» get used in the discussions and they stick to their standard behaviors when discussing anything to do with climate change.

It's striking in this context to recall that, only 20 years ago, the phrase «Science Wars» was used in relation to generally leftish postmodernists in the humanities, who were seen as rejecting science and / or promoting pseudoscience (while some of this stuff was rather silly, there's no evidence that it ever did any actual harm to scScience Wars» was used in relation to generally leftish postmodernists in the humanities, who were seen as rejecting science and / or promoting pseudoscience (while some of this stuff was rather silly, there's no evidence that it ever did any actual harm to scscience and / or promoting pseudoscience (while some of this stuff was rather silly, there's no evidence that it ever did any actual harm to sciencescience).