But between these primitive forms of sign interpretation and the interpretation and
use of language there are many intermediate levels.
Not exact matches
There are extremely powerful tools that can help knowledge workers find insightful perspectives and answer a whole host
of questions they might have about their area
of business
using natural
language, just like
using a search engine, but far more meaningful.
«Some Americans can feel that having a president that got
there using that type
of language gives them an excuse to behave however they want,» David says.
What it does mean, is that once kids are old enough to understand the finer points
of language (and according to Bergen, that's probably younger than you imagine),
there's no cause for guilt if you
use (and they pick up) some less - than - demure
language.
Business Insider
used IIE's research to find the top 20 countries and then researched the basics
of what they need to know before moving
there: official
language, currency, and exchange rate (as
of early August).
While it's true that people often
use cryptic
language to show off, just as often it's simply a case
of forgetting that
there are those in the world who don't live and breathe the markets.
This is, needless to say, far beyond the capabilities
of most users: not only do they not understand that
there needs to be a conversation before the conversation, they don't even know the
language they need to
use.
It is absolutely committed to the negative doctrine that
there is no divine revelation that delivers genuine knowledge
of God; it is absolutely committed to a radically apophatic conception
of Christian theology, so that no human
language or concept, no product
of reason at all, can adequately express the mystery
of the divine; and it is absolutely committed to
using theology to articulate Christian doctrine given the needs and idiom
of the day.
Then
there is the FACT that you continue to
use inflammatory
language such as «lack
of intellectual honesty,» «too busy,» and «naive» and my developing THEORY that your arrogant attitude may be what is preventing both riches and fame from making their way into your life.
Susan and Sarah, in the greek
language,
there are a few different words
used to describe the different types
of love.
The
language we
use of «encounter» is very deliberately chosen, because in an encounter
there's no pressure, but you are offering something.»
But I think
there is some risk that it might be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to be fundamental: that the Passion is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which is the unique and all - pervading characteristic
of the life
of Jesus is paradoxically manifested; that it is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear upon him are a judgement and a testing exercised (
of course, within the permissive will
of God) by evil men, or, to
use mythological
language, by the devil; and that the judgement
of God pronounced at Calvary is that which Christ's accepting love passes upon those men, and upon ourselves as sharers in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin in all its hatefulness.
By this «in - mythologizing,»
there is the possibility
of penetration into the reality which the ancient cosmology and the mythology
used by the biblical writers was attempting to state in
language appropriate to their time.
There still exists inequality and oppression in the Church regarding women religious, propounded by the
use of gender - specific
language:
As I point out in Darwin on Trial, molecular biologists even now
use the
language of intelligent communication (information, libraries, translation) because
there is no other way to depict what they are seeing.
There are, for example, signals
used in animal communication, nonconventional signals which include some gestures, and single - word sentences such as the word «Tree»
used by children in the early stages
of language acquisition.
While Madison's
use of the Christian tradition employs a restricted, even chaste
use of theological
language» the name Jesus Christ is never mentioned, only «divine Author
of our religion»»
there can be no doubt that his worldview is Christian.
There was initial rote memorization
of the words that, in their various inflections, were the elements
of the
language — usually more
of them than any ancient speaker ever
used, or ever knew.
It has raised consciousness about the
use of sexist
language in the churches and resulted in some changes
there.
With the arrival
of the new translation
of the Roman Missal
there is, as one would expect, much talk about the kind
of language we
use to express our relationship with God.
There is no room for quibbling over whether or not «grind» and «mill» were
used sexually in the Greek
language of the first century, and that this layer
of meaning was familiar to literate Greeks.
The Greek term psyche (soul), which Christians naturally found themselves
using in order to describe the spiritual aspect
of a man, already implied the dualistic approach to human nature and introduced a concept for which
there had been no verbal equivalent in the
language of ancient Israel.26
@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies
of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth
of Christ, Your interpretation
of God at His worst shows a complete lack
of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts
of the New Testament were written in as to date
there are no original copies available.Greek was the common
language of the day.Most
of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three
of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company
of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word
used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard
of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»
There are hundreds
of translations, and they don't always say the same things, so I prefer to
use the original
language.
There are a number
of other places where the Bible speaks
using «all
of»
language where it is quite clear it doesn't mean that literalistically.
This term, which is commonly translated as «emptiness,» is
used to express a condition in which
there is no ontological substance in the process
of becoming, and no reality independent
of a
language system.
Furthermore,
there are first - rank theologians and biblical scholars who, though they have rejected the crude literalism
of a descent
of Christ through the clouds as the mythological product
of a prescientific age, nevertheless
use the
language of a second coming to designate the final consummation
of the kingdom.
We can reason about all kinds
of stuff that's hard, but this one, it's like
there's a block, atheists WONT talk about it
using the
language of believers, you just want to berate us with equations.
Aside from little, cartoony representations
of emotions,
there really isn't an effective way to
use body
language.
While most
of those people are making their fortune playing to the lowest common denominator and may not exactly believe in the hateful
language they
use,
there are thousands and thousands who listen and feel justified expressing their bigotry and hatred.
In both Appleby's and Juergensmeyer's volumes,
there is a conflict between the
use of religious - studies vocabulary and the urgent desire to make that
language serve particular ethical ends.
Indeed the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, who exposed the limitations
of our
use of language, himself said, that
there was a mystery beyond
language.
If
there is still resistance to granting that a psychological offense is sufficient cause for modifying the
use of language, then recall that lawyers have long been conscious
of the slippery nature
of the English male pronoun.
Her fear
of death, has caused her to jump on the fundie bandwagon, because
there she finds comfort in the way
language is
used in defending their belief.
There is also a simple reciprocity in the
use of language as a technology, in this sense, in which it shapes the culture and rationality to which it gives expression.
There is an abstract nature to the
language used about logical inferences concerning a necessary being, but the concrete actuality, described in terms
of analogy and metaphor, is something each man finally intuits for himself.
On the contrary,
there is for them a more «realistic» insistence on the
use of language as being
of necessity the symbols for that which we experience or observe.
And then comes: the taboo subjects; talking about people as if they are not
there (or as if they are an «issue», not a person); assuming everyone (who counts) is
of a certain race, ability, class,
language, sexuality or gender; various non-biblical behavioural rules; the targeted enforcement
of church rules (whether «biblical» or not) on particular groups; and the general reluctance to see things from another's perspective (even if this is a skill that churchgoers
use all day, every day, outside thw church).
«The Road Ahead in Theology» (September 19, 1962) declared that theologians ought to become more sensitive to the proper
use of religious
language and that
there is a demand for a natural theology that will eschew dogmatic revelation claims and seek a responsible and reasonable Christian faith able to win its way in the marketplace
of ideas.
It would be like saying the ancient writings on clay tablets found were a random act
of insects crawling and landing on wet clay and over time those impressions dried - but
there was never a group
of people that had a written
language using clay tablets.
It indicates that
there are different
uses of language according to sets
of rules.
Many, it seems to me, rely too heavily on strong association where it no longer exists:
there is a disappointing
use of unmodified traditional Christian
language («God said he would send his Son, Allelu, Allelu!
Again, aside from the parables,
there is a great wealth
of two types
of discourse which are especially easy to recall, the
use of figurative
language and the
use of the aphorism or short sententious utterances which, heard but once, are easily remembered.
The good news is that in their new
Use of Seal Guidelines (PDF),
there is explicit
language regarding «scaling up»
of amounts
of certified ingredients.
Gunner T
Using foul
language is one thing, but depicting a scenario like that is not conducive at all on this site because remember
there are minors that come onto this forum too that do not need to be exposed to that type
of filthy demeanor.
It's also «widely known» that
there is a backlash against
using language of war in inappropriate manner, but the unknowing just glide along, blithely insulting millions
of military man and women.
The Commission later rejected Wenger's claim that «
there is ambiguity
of interpretation in the
language used based on English not being Mr Wenger's first
language.»
You can help by
using a soothing tone
of voice and
use your own body
language to show him that
there is nothing to be scared
of.
There's a lot
of terminology
used in association with breast pumps and if you don't know what these concepts mean, it can sounds like a foreign
language.
Certainly,
there is a cadre
of individuals working for local child protective services and infant mortality review boards and SIDS prevention subgroups that
use inflammatory
language and make condescending statements about bedsharing parents and maintain that «good parents» would never bedshare under any circumstances.