Sentences with phrase «use of lethal force»

The phrase "use of lethal force" refers to the act of using violence or physical force with the intention of causing death. Full definition
If the players want to see a decrease in use of lethal force by police officers, they would accomplish a lot more by condemning criminal activity and promoting compliance (following officer's orders in any interactions) then they will by labeling police officers as racists (regardless of the circumstances of the shooting and whether it was justified or not).
Office spokesman Rupert Colville reiterated calls for an independent investigation into Israel's use of lethal force in border demonstrations in recent weeks, including the deadliest incident on Monday, when dozens were killed.
The exhibition features a new series of Black Lives Matter paintings conceived by the Richmond, Va. - born artist in response to the Michael Brown and Eric Garner killings and the rallying of communities across the United States in protest of police use of lethal force on unarmed black men and youth.
Beijing says 19 people died in the riots, but the Tibetan government in exile says hundreds were killed by Chinese troops use of lethal force.
There have been recommendations in some coroner's inquests to increase the use of Tasers but former Supreme Court of Canada justice Frank Iacobucci's 2014 report reviewing the Toronto polices» use of lethal force sounded a note of caution pointing to the «absence of definitive research into the risks of CEWs for populations who are likely to encounter the police in non-criminal contexts.»
It was open for the jury to find that the Crown had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the second volley was not a justified use of lethal force on the basis that at the time Forcillo fired the second volley, Forcillo did not reasonably perceive that Yatim posed an imminent threat to him.
More precisely: does the Constitution sanction the private use of lethal force, and if so, how can that understanding be squared with the unalienable character of the rights bestowed upon us by the laws of nature and nature's God?
The «presumption against war» is sometimes expressed as a presumption against violence, with violence defined as any use of lethal force.
«In Ireland the British Army is responsible for the use of lethal force, shoot - to - kill, the use of rubber and plastic bullets, collusion, internment and torture — all with official impunity.»
He has been accused of glorifying and encouraging the use of lethal force by police, and once caused a big stir when saying on video that some police have told him they go home and have great sex after killing someone on the job.
The use of lethal force can be justified if one reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent (and unjustified) death or great bodily harm to oneself or another.
As usual, the «reasonable person» test would be applied by the judicial system, potentially in an adversarial court trial, to determine whether your use of lethal force was justified.
However, if you observed the officer discharge his weapon, and he continued his armed assault, and it was clear to you that he was shooting at a person that posed no immediate threat to another person, then it's conceivable your use of lethal force would considered justified.
In the wake of this tragedy, Chief Bill Blair engaged former Supreme Court Justice, Frank Iacobucci to conduct an independent review of the use of lethal force by the Toronto Police Service.
about Submission of the Ontario Human Rights Commission to the Independent Review of the use of lethal force by the Toronto Police Service
In this case your own life is threatened, even though you created the situation that warranted the use of lethal force against you.
Z v United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 3 put it succinctly: «A requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is explicit... a prompt response by the authorities in investigating a use of lethal force may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of the law.»
What is being discussed in the media, in light of recent events, is whether the situation warranted the use of lethal force.
There is a need to ensure appropriate or meaningful human control or judgement over the use of force, including the use of lethal force against human targets.
In its first publication on the matter, this 6 - pp backgrounder by James Jay Carafano says autonomous technologies «may well be a defining characteristic of future generations of military systems» and endorses current US policy, which it interprets as reserving the use of lethal force for human operators.
We would like the CCW process to emerge strengthened from these discussions, resulting in increased systemic controls on international armed conflicts embedded in international law in a manner that does not widen the technology gap amongst states or encourage the use of lethal force to settle international disputes just because it affords the prospects of lesser casualties to one side or that its use can be shielded from the dictates of public conscience.
Their potential use provokes other questions of great importance: is it morally acceptable to delegate decisions about the use of lethal force to such systems?
endorses current US policy, which it interprets as reserving the use of lethal force for human operators.
Already in the United States, the Defense Department has established a clear policy: It reserves the use of lethal force for human operators, and requires safety mechanisms to be built into autonomous systems to keep them from selecting and targeting humans independently.
Wareham addressed Russia's desire for a working definition and affirmed that «by retaining meaningful human control over the use of lethal force in each individual attack we can in effect prohibit the use of fully autonomous weapons and thus achieve a preemptive ban.»
Throughout the conference there did appear to be «universal agreement that humans should remain in control of decisions over the use of lethal force
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z