Sentences with phrase «use of race»

Such concerns notwithstanding, a majority of the court found the public benefits generated by race - conscious policies sufficiently compelling to allow continued use of race in admissions.
As community creations go, this might just be the best use of a racing game photo mode we've ever seen.
In 2013, in a 7 - 1 vote (Justice Elena Kagan recused herself), the Supreme Court sent the case back to the lower courts, saying they had failed to adequately determine that UT's use of race as a factor in its admissions was necessary and that the policy was «narrowly tailored.»
The recent Supreme Court decision, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, ruled unconstitutional the Seattle and Louisville school districts» limited use of race in deciding which students got into overenrolled schools (Seattle) or which students could transfer schools (Louisville), limiting the scope of government intervention to preserve racial balance following the expansion of school choice.
Today, the Supreme Court issued its long - awaited decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, which ruled that use of race by public school systems as one factor in assigning students to school is unconstitutional.
After the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, which limited the voluntary use of race in school assignment plans, 33 the number of schools and districts using socioeconomic integration policies grew rapidly.
Ironically, the more informal use of race used by the University of Michigan Law School could exacerbate such misperceptions.
Yet there may be education reforms such as expanded school choice that both increase segregation by income or race and improve the quality of education for minority and low - income children, particularly given the increasingly stringent limitations on government use of race or ethnicity in student assignment.
«Any university that has an affirmative action policy could be subject to a similar lawsuit regarding whether it's meeting the compelling standards for governmental use of race in education policy.
Use of Race Uncertain for Schools,» July 18, 2007; «Districts Face Uncertainty in Maintaining Racially Diverse Schools,» June 28, 2007.)
Ali, R., & Pérez, T.E. Guidance on the Voluntary Use of Race to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division and U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, December 2011).
Instead, these parts are designed and intended for race vehicles on race tracks with engineers supervising the installation and use of the race parts to ensure that the safety needs of the race driver are met.
But he predicts that the Court will find a way to distinguish Grutter, which allowed the narrow use of race in admissions at the University of Michigan Law School.
Representation of a life insurer faced with a nationwide class action involving claims of fraud and discrimination through alleged use of race - based underwriting practices.
And from Kennedy's concurrence, Goldstein gleans the following points: (1) There is a compelling governmental interest in school diversity; (2) the Constitution does not require color - blindness; (3) racial classifications are subject to strict scrutinty; but (4) that certain uses of race are sufficiently innocuous that they do not trigger strict scrutiny.
Justice Kennedy leaves open the substantial prospect that schools can use the Grutter model of employing race as one of many factors, even absent a showing that other efforts that do not involve the express use of race have failed.
But the case groaned back to life in 2006 when a group organized as the Greenville Parents Association filed a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights objecting to the district's use of race in student assignments.
The cases involve the use of a landmark voting rights law that led to the election of African - Americans across the South and Supreme Court decisions that limited the use of race to draw electoral maps.
Business Insider: There's a fight heating up in the education world over the use of race in college admissions.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of race in college admissions is constitutional, so long as explicit «quotas» aren't used.
One can argue for the use of race as a social construct, but in that case, skin colour has as much to do with it as shoe size.
The U.S. Justice Department is investigating Harvard University's use of race in admissions and has concluded the school is not following federal law on the matter.
As opposed to 2014, Cox sees a clear path for a Republican victory this year — with the governor's mounting scandals, his second - term swing to the left that has created resentment upstate, and his use of the race as a springboard for a presidential bid, which Cox said would rub voters the wrong way.
In its previous decisions, the court had prohibited the use of race simply for the purpose of racial balancing (15 - 17).
Fortunately, the Supreme Court did not eliminate the use of race as a factor in the University of Michigan Law School admissions process (see the full text of the court's decision here).
The debate over the use of race in admission decisions has been wrenching, because it demands a trade - off among three worthwhile goals: race - blindness, academic selectivity, and a semblance of racial diversity on selective campuses.
The decision was tailored to accommodate universities» use of race in admission decisions, while limiting the impact outside of higher education.
With the U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments 9 December on a case challenging the use of race - conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin, a top AAAS official said there is convincing research on the benefits of a diverse student population in science - related fields.
More fundamentally, the use of race as the basis for evaluating a film, or any other creative work is artistically bankrupt and politically reactionary.
A number of states, including California, have passed referenda that prohibit the use of race by schools and other public institutions to distinguish among applicants.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision limiting the use of race in school assignments will likely result in a period of upheaval as school districts drop race - conscious policies and consider whether to try alternative means to keep schools integrated, experts say.
Roberts argued that this position was commanded by the Constitution and was consistent with Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which in Roberts's view was not about school integration but about prohibiting any use of race in school assignments, regardless of the purpose.
On October 10th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case contesting the use of race in college admissions brought by petitioner, Abigail Noel Fisher, against The University of Texas at Austin.
The whole thrust of Brown was that segregation was actually harmful to students, not that the use of race itself was always and everywhere to be rejected.
But his education cases — particularly those relating to the use of race in student - assignment and admissions policies in K — 12 and higher education — paint a different picture.
The second possible rationale is the notion that the equal protection clause requires colorblindness and prohibits any and all uses of race.
And the use of race as a proxy by some reformers, to gauge the seriousness of other reformers» commitments to issues of social justice, is a relatively new phenomenon.
Highlights this fall include a conversation with Claude Steele, social psychologist, executive vice chancellor and provost for University of California, and author of Whistling Vivaldi, about how stereotypes can impact education; a discussion about the use of race in college admissions with Economic Policy Institute Research Associate Richard Rothstein and Georgetown Law Professor Sheryll Cashin; and a forum about education leadership.
Highlights this fall include a conversation with Claude Steele, social psychologist, executive vice chancellor and provost for University of California, and author of Whistling Vivaldi, about how stereotypes can impact education; a discussion about the use of race in college admissions with Economic Policy Institute Research Associate Richard Rothstein and...
The former is more likely to happen in school districts that have very few whites left and in districts that have had strong appeals court opinions rejecting the use of race altogether.
The 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision outlawing the use of racial quotas at the University of Michigan — but approving the use of race as one of many factors in admissions decisions — has had little impact on magnet schools, mainly because most had already abandoned the use of quotas.
In 2001 only the federal appeals court covering the states of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont had upheld the use of race in student assignment or magnet school admissions in school districts not already under court order; it did so on the grounds that the state had a compelling interest in racial diversity.
The latter is more likely to occur in school districts such as Fort Wayne, Indiana, that have enough whites left to actually integrate a number of magnet schools and where there has been no strong circuit court decision rejecting the use of race.
If most universities want their student bodies to be as diverse as possible, then why is the use of race - based affirmative action declining?
Since 2010, the civil rights office has issued detailed directives on eliminating racial disparities in school discipline; the allocation of school resources among racial groups; schools» responsibility for preventing bullying; the use of race - based assignments to achieve diversity; achieving gender equity in intercollegiate and interscholastic sports, and support for pregnant and parenting students.
The University of Michigan is involved in two law suits — Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger — that center on the key question of whether diversity is a compelling interest to justify the use of race - conscious affirmative action in admissions.
Parents Involved commenced this suit in the Western District of Washington, alleging that Seattle's use of race in assignments violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 4 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,5 and the Washington Civil Rights Act.6 Id., at 28a - 35a.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z