[From Green Car Congress:] EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson today proposed a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Program designed to double the US
use of renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.
Direct government incentives or mandates have been established in the past to encourage
the use of renewable fuels such as PEF.»
Not exact matches
«This is about «bridge energy»,» Fahy said, referring to the transitional or intermittent
use of fossil
fuels such as natural gas to reach
renewable energy goals.
Using excess energy from
renewable energy resources
such as solar and wind to split water into oxygen and hydrogen — a process called electrolysis — could be the best solution for creating large supplies
of sustainable hydrogen
fuel.
If
such developments were to occur elsewhere, either because
of shale gas or the advent
of a truly global natural gas market, then, according to our analysis, this could have a major impact on the
use of different
fuels — oil, gas, coal,
renewables, and nuclear.»
«
Using solar energy to drive the production
of liquid
fuels such as gasoline from CO2 is one
of the holy grails in
renewable energy research.
«The methodology can not be
used to infer anything about the direct impacts
of specific policies,
such as power plant emissions limits or
renewable portfolio standards, or the effect that changes in relative prices may have on
fuel choice,
such as the impact
of the change in supply or price
of natural gas or
renewables may have had on the competitiveness
of coal.
A carbon fee + dividend scheme
such as suggested by James Hansen would not only go a long way to «curb massively the fossil
fuel use», but it would also have the added beneficial effects
of slightly redistributing income, improving public health, stimulating the economy and greatly accelerating the inevitable transition to
renewable energy.
The Way Forward As China seeks a cleaner, softer path
of development,
renewable energy sources
such as wind, solar, and geothermal are attractive not only because
of their lower carbon emissions profiles, but because they
use far less water than their fossil
fuel counterparts.
Such policies should promote the
use of non-combustion
renewable energy, low carbon
fuels (measured on a lifecycle basis), expanded transmission and smart grid technologies, alternative forms
of transportation, and energy storage.
The campus greenhouse gas reduction plan outlined in the report centers on four key approaches: reducing the overall energy
use on campus, reducing the
use of fossil
fuels in campus buildings and vehicles, increasing the
use of renewable energy sources to meet campus needs, and minimizing the release
of «fugitive» gases from campus operations
such as specialty research gases in laboratory buildings.
Such a hybrid infrastructure would lower the
use of carbon
fuels for the generation
of electricity, because
renewable energy can replace them if there is sufficient sun or wind available.
It stresses the good,
such as «we will
use and generate only
renewable energy,» rather than the more commonly stated less bad; «we will reduce our
use of fossil
fuels.»
This is a regulation from EPA that forces states to reduce fossil
fuel use in their electricity generation in favor
of «
renewables»
such as wind and solar (but not hydro, which most environmental groups dislike,
of course), whether they want to or not.
(Sec. 126) Amends the CAA to revise the definition
of «
renewable biomass» for purposes
of the
renewable fuel standard by expanding the amount
of biomass from forested land that could be
used to produce
fuels under
such standard and eliminating the requirement that feedstock crops come from previously cultivated land.
Using paper fiber as
fuel reduces the amount
of CO2 permanently released into the environment compared to the burning
of fossil
fuels,
such as coal, that are not
renewable.
There are immense direct and indirect public benefits in transitioning to an efficient
renewable energy system in terms
of reduced incidence
of diseases
such as asthma, freeing up
of most
of the supplies
of water that are now
used for thermal electricity generation (and hence reduced conflict over water), reduced air, water, and soil pollution that accompanies fossil
fuel production, processing and
use, and greatly improved prospects
of avoiding the worst consequences
of climate change.
Finally, it should be noted that socioeconomic hypotheses associated with the lower emission trajectories (
such as the one commented upon by Tim Worstall) imply a greatly increased
use of nuclear and fossil
fuels, especially cooal and natural gas, and the share
of renewable sources reaching much less than the «80 %» claimed by the recent «
renewable energy» IPCC report.
ClearFuels expects that the life - cycle carbon footprint
of renewable fuels produced by ClearFuels - Rentech technologies can be near zero, depending on the feedstock and the alternate
use of such feedstock.
Getting greenhouse gas emissions to 60 percent below the 1990 level will require four types
of measures: aggressive energy efficiency, aggressive electrification, decarbonizing electricity (
such as by
using renewable energy sources) and decarbonizing the remaining
fuel supply (
such as by
using biofuels).
In any event, even
using such inflated claims
of «subsidies», on a joule / subsidy - cost basis, fossil
fuels beat the snot out
of renewables.
«The methodology can not be
used to infer anything about the direct impacts
of specific policies,
such as power plant emissions limits or
renewable portfolio standards, or the effect that changes in relative prices may have on
fuel choice,
such as the impact
of the change in supply or price
of natural gas or
renewables may have had on the competitiveness
of coal.
Since ethanol producers» goal is more ethanol
use, and an EPA pullback on E15 would get in the way
of that goal, attacks on both studies —
such as those by the
Renewable Fuels Association — aren't surprising.
This feat, according to the calculator, would require a series
of massive changes to how we
use energy,
such as a shift from fossil
fuels towards nuclear and
renewables, and much wider
use of electric heat and transport.
Renewable energy technologies produce clean energy, can be better scaled to meet demand than large dams, reduce dependence on problematic energy sources
such as fossil
fuels and large hydro, and can be
used in rural areas far from the grid, where most
of the world's un-electrified communities are located.
Important to note is the comprehensive breadth
of sectors that fall under the «new energy» concept - its not just
renewables such as wind, solar and biomass, but also energy efficiency, nuclear, smart (and strong) grid, transportation, unconventional natural gas, and more efficient
use of fossil
fuels.
Federal law mandates that oil companies
use 12 billion gallons
of renewable fuels such as ethanol in this year, rising to 15 billion gallons by 2015.
This demand is likely to be met by increasing
use of fossil
fuels along with other sources,
such as nuclear and
renewable.»
I wonder how long
such an installation would take if we could institute two conditions: working at wartime speed to effect the transition (24/7, all available resources and industry drafted for the effort), and reducing energy expenditures to only the most essential in order to both reduce fossil
fuel use in the interim and reduce the number
of renewables facilities required (and minimize fossil
fuel use for their construction).
I am all for
using more
renewables but when anyone states get rid
of all fossil
fuels, I chuckle to myself and get then feel sad because there is no engineering or science currently in place anywhere in the globe that can do
such a thing.
It is because so little energy is being
used, and because alternatives are ruled out ab initio (the model contains no nuclear power, and no technology for storing away carbon emissions from fossil
fuels; natural gas prices rise strongly and coal plants are retired well before they are clapped out) that the model ends up with
such a high percentage
of renewables; indeed given the premise it's slightly surprising it doesn't end up with even more.
While natural gas has a slight environmental benefit relative to the
use of conventional liquid
fuels,
such as gasoline and diesel, the environmental performance
of natural gas can be greatly improved by procurement from
renewable sources.
Nor the planet where
renewable energy is growing rapidly and increasing constraints are being placed on the
use of dirty
fuels such as coal.