Sentences with phrase «use of strawmans»

Your use of strawmen using micro and stand - alone data / arguments doesn't reflect a real world.

It's not his maths that matter, it's his knowledge of physics and his use of strawmen.

Not exact matches

The words «chance» and «accidents» are not part of the equation; they are only used when the dishonest party wishes to put forth an easy target --- they are part of strawman fallacies, not genuine debate.

The LGBTQ and their atheist allies here have used Christianity as the strawman for relentless and specious attacks because the morality of Christianity is a stumbling block for the fornicating actions of non-celibate LGBTQ.

Love has no part of my statement, so to try and use it to confuse the debate is a strawman.

The strawman would be creating an argument of an opposing side that didn't exist prior to it and using that as a launching point for your argument.

-1 - while the concept of the answer is correct, using strawman arguments to paint your political opponents as evil isn't a sound approach.

Teenagers in general discuss sex like the promiscuous strawmen of various judgmental literature, a few shots of drug use away from simply bringing Go Ask Alice to life.

The vast majority of uses of the phrase is as a strawman critique against mainstream science.

One of the great strawman arguments used by the AGW believers is along the lines of «since you can not show a criminal conspiracy behind AGW, it must be true.»

You seem to be making a strawman point — this thread is about John Kehr's use of GISP2 to indicate that the last 30 years has not been abnormal, and to consider that point we really need to see the last 30 years in context — which we can not do for satellite data starting in 1979...

What I can't take is this aggressively stupid belligerence against the trail of knowledge and evidence that you garden - variety skeptics take, using all sorts of strawman arguments along the way.

The one I read had the feel of a hatchet job, the hatchet was used to make chopped liver of the work in order to give substance to a strawman was my take on it.

My use of the word «fantasy» is consistent with this (deliberate or otherwise) conflation and / or strawman construction, and «imbeciles» is broadly consistent with those who accept such conflation without question...

From the list of fallacious arguments, I notice that you use the technique of demanding impossible perfection mixed with the old reliable strawman.

The first part of the derivations are done correctly but a few strange sentences are included, and one of them is used as a strawman argument against criticism of Held.

Note that plenty of good climate scientists critique the IPCC all the time: most of the quality scientists who do so, however, use much less charged language and many fewer strawmen that are evidenced in this post.

I often see «those who use the word skeptics in scarequotes» build strawmen out of valid arguments too.

Increasing penalties for people who make use of so - called «strawman» schemes («get out of debt free» scams)