On November 21, 2013, the Senate used the so - called «nuclear option», voting 52 - 48 — with all Republicans and three Democrats voting against — to eliminate
the use of the filibuster on executive branch nominees and judicial nominees, except to the Supreme Court.
The answer is that since November 2013 a simple majority has sufficed because of the Senate's decision to end
the use of the filibuster in respect of all nominees to Federal judicial and executive branch positions other than to the Supreme Court itself.
Gillibrand also reiterated Schumer's warning against using the so - called «nuclear option» to ram Gorsuch's confirmation through — that is, changing Senate rules to block
use of the filibuster.
Washington (CNN)- Barely a month in office, Sen. Scott Brown, R - Massachusetts, is putting some muscle behind his independent image by twice voting against his own party and questioning
the use of the filibuster.
Virtually absent was talk about Senate obstructionism, the inane and perpetual
use of the filibuster, and the possibility of passing legislation through reconciliation, issues that David Roberts has covered at length (and with good reason).
As someone who can watch these developments unfold at something of a comfortable distance, what are your views on the judicial confirmation battles underway in the U.S. Senate,
the use of filibusters, and the use of recess appointments to place filibustered nominees onto the federal appellate courts?
Not exact matches
Although Paul's
filibuster was technically against Brennan's nomination, his remarks focused primarily on civil liberties issues, offering a scathing critique
of the Obama's administration's
use of unmanned drones, and refusal to rule out military strikes against American citizens on U.S. soil.
Republicans are
using what's called «budget reconciliation» to pass their health care bill with a bare majority
of 50 votes and avoid a Democratic
filibuster.
And I freely admit I sometimes
use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences written quickly and in a stream -
of - conscientiousness, run - on sort
of fashion with occasional typos mostly due to fatigue
of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day
of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though
of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more
of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt
of «text
filibustering» not that this is exactly
filibustering more a spontaneous text performance response joke and meant in jest to be absurdly long and useless so
of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.
Bullshit, suggests Chait: Obama has in fact «
used exactly the kind
of rhetoric Westen accuses him
of refusing to deploy,» but structural and practical obstacles like «special interest lobbying, the
filibuster, macroeconomic conditions, not to mention certain settled beliefs
of public opinion» can defeat the loftiest
of presidential speeches.
This was done recently to prevent
filibusters of appointments in the Senate, but otherwise had never actually been
used due to other political concerns.
When the Constitutional Assembly, renamed Council, after four months
of work, had delivered its bill to Parliament, the minority in Parliament
used unprecedented
filibuster against the bill for months.
And, we see the reinvention
of a very old technique for a digital age, in this case the
filibuster, which as Tumulty's article points out, was first
used in the U.S. Senate when the Constitution was in diapers.
Congress also
uses modifications
of straight Robert's Rules voting like the
filibuster, holds, Senatorial privilege for judicial appointments, supermajority voting on treaties, «fast track voting» without amendments and similar variants.
You are not thinking that Republicans would abandon all
of their talk about the injustice
of filibusters and
use one themselves would you?
For instance, once the majority party breaks a
filibuster through cloture, the minority party is allowed 30 additional hours
of post-cloture debate — a procedural maneuver Democrats can
use to drain the clock and bog down the confirmation process.
(CNN)- Goodwin Liu, a California law professor nominated by President Barack Obama for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals, asked Thursday for his name to be withdrawn after Senate Republicans had invoked a rarely
used filibuster to block a final floor vote.
The Kentucky Republican said a
filibuster - which he
used earlier this year to demand more information from the Obama administration on the
use of drones - could only delay a vote, but wouldn't «put off a vote forever.»
The questions Paul has raised during his
filibuster about the Obama administration's abuse
of power (and that
of predecessor George W. Bush) in the foreign policy (and even domestic intelligence) arenas, especially in the
use of drones to murder innocent lives in Afghanistan, are legitimate.
«How to
use sites and blawgs to market your law firm Main A
filibuster of Kerry's imagination or a real possibility?»
March 7, 2013 Murder — by - Drone
of Americans Subverts Constitutional and Human Rights FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (406) 442-7800;
[email protected] Helena, MT — Kentucky Senator Rand Paul wrapped up a nearly 13 - hour long
filibuster very early this morning, in which he demanded answers from the Obama administration regarding its position on extrajudicial
use of drones to kill American citizens -LSB-...]