Not exact matches
A
right to
use a portion of a
public good for private gain — the private gain part is a key element in the consideration and also in how a court would look at the transaction.
Administrative Law Judge Ann O'Reilly, of the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings for the
Public Utilities Commission ruled late on Monday that Enbridge should be issued permission for the replacement, but said the company should
use its existing
right of way, adding hurdles to the project's construction.
She continued: «They just up and announced that I was prohibited from speaking anyway... I feel like the Constitution is important and that taxpayer - supported universities should not be
using public funds to violate American citizens» Constitutional
rights.»
«The Turkish government's news media shutdown shows how the State of Emergency law is being
used to deny the
right to free speech beyond any legitimate aim of upholding
public order,» Human
Rights Watch said in a statement.
Oregon law provides a «just compensation»
right for some Oregon property owners if a
public entity enacts or enforces a land
use regulation that has the effect of reducing the value of the property.
Like anyone along the route of proposed oil or gas pipelines, Rosinski was in a position where, had she not signed the agreement, her land would have been taken anyway by virtue of eminent domain — a
right the government can assert to seize private property for
public use.
Since his last re-election, Clarke has openly supported Republican causes on local and national
right - wing media outlets; proudly trumpets on official Milwaukee County letterhead his 2013 award from the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, whose leader suggested
using women and children as human shields during Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy's standoff with federal agents; accused Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele of having «penis envy» and being on heroin when crafting the county budget and needing to be drug tested; blasted Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and Chief Judge Jeffrey Kremers for being «soft on crime»; provided minimal protection for President Obama during his 2012 visit; employs former Scott Walker spokeswoman Fran McLaughlin, who was given criminal immunity over her role in Walker's mixing of campaign and county business; and created pro-gun
public service announcements.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we
use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property
rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the
public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.
He has earned the
right to
use the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation and is a Certified
Public Accountant (CPA).
Facebook is spelling out in plain English how it collects and
uses your data in rewritten versions of its Terms of Service and Data
Use Policy, though it's not asking for new rights to collect and use your data or changing any of your old privacy settings.The public has seven days to comment on the changes (though Facebook doesn't promise to adapt or even respond to the feedback) before Facebook will ask all users to consent to the first set of new rules in three yea
Use Policy, though it's not asking for new
rights to collect and
use your data or changing any of your old privacy settings.The public has seven days to comment on the changes (though Facebook doesn't promise to adapt or even respond to the feedback) before Facebook will ask all users to consent to the first set of new rules in three yea
use your data or changing any of your old privacy settings.The
public has seven days to comment on the changes (though Facebook doesn't promise to adapt or even respond to the feedback) before Facebook will ask all users to consent to the first set of new rules in three years.
«
Right now when you look at [open source blockchain startups such as] Ethereum — these are LGPL [Lesser General
Public License] based licences, which means that if you are to
use it and
use derivative works you have to give it back to the owner.
Right now Memo is getting a lot of
use from the
public today, and the developers say the «Memo server has been under extreme load.»
RELEASE AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY: By participating in any Aberdeen Group survey, entrants agree that Aberdeen Group and any other applicable sponsor, and its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, representatives, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, advertising,
public relations, promotional, fulfillment and marketing, web site providers, web masters, Aberdeen Group and their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents (The «Released Entities»), will have no liability whatsoever for, and shall be held harmless by entrants against any liability for any injuries, losses or damages of any kind to persons, including personal injury or death, or property resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from acceptance, possession, misuse or
use of a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity
rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise delivery.
The Christian
Right wants
public money to be
used for private religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be
used for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks, special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.
However, your fantasy - based religion does exist, and those of us who actually care about the future of this country have every
right to speak out against it being
used in
public policy.
If you're going to write someone in the
public sphere, the least you can do is make sure that you're
using the
right words.
Property
rights and government takings have evolved with both real costs and benefits, e.g. Kelo allowing economic development as a legitimate «
public use» v. the various cases finding in favor of property owners in the context of local government mandated dedications and exactions.
If you can't name him
right away, check Google... for reliability
use Google to find out a report made
public by the Johns Hopkins Universiity Blloomberg School of Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclus
public by the Johns Hopkins Universiity Blloomberg School of
Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclus
Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclusion...
It is christians who are out attempting to impose their views (ie: denial of gay
rights b / c their book apparently says so; denial of women's
rights;
using the threat of hell; teaching dis - proven creationism to innocent children) on the
public.
Having spent two years writing his story —
using only his
right thumb to control his computer — he would also like to do some lecturing and
public speaking.
The great issues of our time are moral: the
uses of power; wealth and poverty; human
rights; the moral quality and character of society; loss of the sense of the common good in tandem with the pampering of private interests; domestic violence; outrageous legal and medical costs in a system of maldistributed services; unprecedented developments in biotechnologies which portend good but risk evil; the violation of
public trust by high elected officials and their appointees; the growing militarization of many societies; continued racism; the persistence of hunger and malnutrition; a still exploding population in societies hard put to increase jobs and resources; abortion; euthanasia; care for the environment; the claims of future generations.
Using key episodes in American history as case studies, Meacham shows that Americans have not always gotten
public religion
right.
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the
right use of sovereign
public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
Insofar as the need for defense provides just cause for
public use of the sword, it comes from the responsibility of government to protect order, justice, and peace, not simply from the
right to respond to an attacker in kind.
The most explicit statement of these limitations is in the Constitution's first ten amendments — the Bill of
Rights — which guarantee freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition, the
right to bear arms, protection against the obligatory quartering of soldiers, security from unwarranted search and seizure, the
right to a grand jury, protection against double jeopardy and self - incrimination, the
right of due process, just compensation for private property taken for
public use, and speedy
public trial by jury without excessive fines or bail.
Look at some of the laws in this country, and the ignorant christians who are trying to prevent atheists from voting or holding
public office, or to simply
use their first amendment
rights for freedom of speech.
I have a problem with people who want to
use public funds and resources to promote their beliefs, who
use their beliefs to stifle others» civil
rights, who try to inject their beliefs into
public school science classes, and who want their children to have the ability to bully others» with their beliefs.
It does not feel quite
right to
use the term with political leaders, or especially military heroes, although it works okay with some «
public intellectuals.»
But this man seems to truly believe what he is stating and he has every
right to
use his
public status to proclaim his beliefs, as long as they are not racist or profane, or cruel.
We care when christians try to impose their beliefs in the
public square or impose on the basic
rights of others (no Atheist would ever
use a book to tell gays they are «sinning»).
Third, the
right wing makes an error that has long been
used to justify commercial broadcasting: it confuses the
public with the market, and equates citizens with consumers.
For
right now, the «standard» religious symbolism of Christian images, the ones that believers pray before and
use within their worship, really don't have any place decorating
public places in America because their presence there only serves to mark them as places of worship too.
Unless the general
public — not just the highly educated leaders of church and society, but the general
public — knows about these problem with all their pros and cons, and are able to weigh and consider alternatives and solutions from every standpoint — left,
right and center — unless that happens, our nation will never be able to fight its way back toward solutions that will build us up, strengthen our resolve, and re-create the nation I
used to love and I now would love to reform.
Whether the issue was civil
rights, Vietnam or urban renewal, the Century always feared the activities of the radical element, and abhorred the
use of violence to gain power in
public life.
It withdraws protection from the weak and vulnerable, allowing the strong to define the status and
rights of the weak; it privatizes matters which, in any legitimate political order, must be
public in nature; it sets innumerable roadblocks to the rectification of the problem through mutual deliberation of citizens in legislative assemblies; and it has made what
used to be its most loyal citizens — religious believers — enemies of the common good whenever their convictions touch upon
public things.
The freedom of assembly is another
right guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States which Christians have
used to defend their
right to gather in church buildings and other
public areas for the purpose of worship and fellowship.
To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or other
rights of us or other users, third parties or the
public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by
using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.
«Some of the areas we
use as general
public and party and bar areas
right on the water turn into dining areas during the wintertime,» Moore says.
Also, we must
use our brand power in a positive way, contributing the
right recycling and littering messages, as well as showing the
public that we are doing more.»
It seems that the
right to
use the name applied to patented articles does not pass to the
public upon the expiration of the patent, where the
use of the name antedated the existence of the patent, and where it further appears that the name and not the patent gave the article its value.
In Hopkins on Trade - Marks, 2nd Ed., page 80, after a statement of the general rule that the
right to
use the name passes to the
public with the dedication resulting from the expiration of the patent, it is added --
By
using the Website you acknowledge and agree that Non-GMO Project may access, preserve, and disclose your Account Information and any Posted Content associated with that Account if required to do so by law or in a good - faith belief that such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, (b) enforce this Agreement, including the investigation of potential violations thereof, (c) detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues (including, without limitation, the filtering of spam), (d) respond to user support requests, or (e) protect the
rights, property or safety of Non-GMO Project, its users and the
public.
Right now, the only additional license you need is if your patio is
using public space, so if it is in part on the sidewalk.
There's no «
right» way to arrive at a price yet oddsmakers typically have their hands forced to an extent by the market Rather than going rouge, hanging a line at -2.5 for a football game when other books sit -3 says enough about taking a strong position instead of just
using pick and then being shocked when every
public bettor and professional buries PK.
You acknowledge and agree that MomsTeam may disclose your personal information if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with legal process, to enforce these Terms of
Use, or, in its sole discretion, to protect the
rights, property, or personal safety of MomsTeam, its employees, users and third parties, and the
public.
They rely heavily on the manipulation of
public opinion, appearing respectable;
using front groups, funding science and infiltrating food safety systems — all with the purpose of weakening legislation — legislation that is essential for stopping marketing practices that violate children's
rights to health and improves product quality and safety.
The burp cloths are just the
right size to throw over your shoulder, but don't confuse them with the larger receiving blankets many moms choose to
use when breastfeeding in
public.
Your
rights as a woman are somewhat limited here, but by
using a private hospital, I was actually consulted and given choices that I wouldn't have had in the
public hospitals, such as having my husband in the delivery room and him being able to cut the cord.
Just politely remind them that the law gives you the
right to nurse in
public, and ask them to please go away.Feel free to
use any part of my comment, if you'd like.
It was during a press conference on Sept. 16, in response to a question about homeland security efforts infringing on civil
rights, that Bush first
used the telltale word «crusade» in
public.