Racial quotas are not allowed, and universities, as far as I know, are not
using racial quotas.
Not exact matches
States would now be required to
use a standard methodology for comparing
racial and ethnic groups and to
use quota - like «reasonable thresholds» allowed by the Department for determining when minorities are over-represented.
A quarter - century after outlawing strict
racial quotas in higher education, the U.S. Supreme Court heard powerful arguments last week on whether race can still be one factor among many that colleges
use to achieve diversity in admissions.
The 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision outlawing the
use of
racial quotas at the University of Michigan — but approving the
use of race as one of many factors in admissions decisions — has had little impact on magnet schools, mainly because most had already abandoned the
use of
quotas.
But even in that circuit, several school districts and one state (Connecticut) have continued to avoid the
use of
racial quotas in magnet admissions because they believe
using them invites a legal challenge.
A Boston lawyer has challenged the city school system's
use of
racial quotas in determining which students get admitted to its most prestigious schools.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the educational benefits that flow from having a diverse student body can justify
using race as one factor among many in a «holistic» evaluation, while rejecting blunt
racial quotas or race - based point systems.
Relying on cherry - picked statutory history, Brennan found that Title VII's plain text did not prohibit collectively bargained, voluntary affirmative action programs that attempt to remedy disparate impact — statistical imbalances in the
racial composition of employment groups — even if such plans
used quota systems.