Sentences with phrase «use real arguments»

I want to be optimistic but use real arguments please.

Not exact matches

Our recent book, «Saving International Adoption: An Argument from Economics and Personal Experience,» explores the rationale - both real and invented - that countries use to explain curtailing foreign adoptions.

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

One of the key arguments used in opposition to cryptocurrency is the lack of real - world value.

The real john Again, why is name calling the only argument that they could use against non-believers in the Bible and today?

(11) The real argument, however, was not so much with tradition as with a church which used tradition authoritatively.

Yes, they need to be taught to believe in gods, but babies don't have the ability to determine that gods are, or aren't real either, which make that argument a whole lot less compelling than the people who like to use it would like.

Additionally, the r ape argument is always used to obfuscate the real reason that unborn children are killed, namely — convenience.

Most of the creationist / ID web sites have quietly begun to ask their followers to stop using a whole set of arguments against evolution, including the «just a theory» argument, because they reveal the person's woeful ignorance of real science.

Only a real die - hard would use the old «take the human eye» argument when we have examples in nature of every stage in eye development up to, and beyond the eye.

Whenever people disagree with eachother on here the «FIFA isn't the real world» argument is used.

Your argument can still be used for the defending case, i.e. «this is Real we are talking about, with Ronaldo, Asensio, Vasquez, up front, supported by Kroos and Kovacic».

VJ, I'll try to get past your weird use of «quotes» to get to your real argument.

At the same time though, this is often used as a way of sidestepping the real issue — a quick joke distracts from the fact that the arguments for the retention of the sculptures are all relatively weak.

************** Funny, it sounds rather liek the arguments the Right uses to implement the laws designed to prevent voter fraud: Laws designed to correct a non-existant problem, except that racial discrimination is very real --- well if it is «very real» you and the leftist democrats should have no problem with offering concrete evidence of it.

«Whether Mr. Silver engaged in extramarital affairs does not make it more or less likely, for instance, that he used his official position to obtain referrals from real - estate developers,» they said in written arguments.

Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph's theorem, known as PBR, uses a sophisticated mathematical argument to show that any interpretation of quantum mechanics that doesn't treat the wave function as a real object invariably leads to results that contradict quantum theory itself.

Cantor used an elegant argument to show that the naturals, although infinitely numerous, are actually less numerous than another common family of numbers, the «reals.»

Dan Bilzerian said that DeLuca used his wife's phone to call him and insult him multiple times, but the real reason for the argument between these two is unknown.

Working for a real - world client — an international non-profit — Alicia created a multimedia campaign using solid science and social science arguments and the advanced graphic design and media skills she acquired in her high school classes.

They read a novel about life in urban America, they write letters to city council members and state representatives, the compile statistics to support their arguments in their letters; in short, they use their discipline - based skills of scientific inquiry, math, literacy, social studies and health to do what people in the real world do — synthesize the skills and knowledge in a meaningful way.

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

What's not real, Neal says, are the arguments being used to threaten legislators — namely, that it's a federal scheme to tell teachers what to teach, that private groups will mine and profit from test results, and that Common Core will take local control of schools away from Oklahomans.

Taking up the same baseless, tired, and nostalgic arguments used by Charles Murray (and citing that tired polemicist's overly long claptrap, Real Education) Gardner declares that the focus on college is ridiculous because some kids in his mind aren't «college material» and that many jobs don't require higher education.

They're high school students, taking the stage to argue HB3431, a bill dealing with technology in their schools, in front of an audience of 900 fellow youth city council members, not to mention the several real legislators who might end up actually using these arguments in real committee hearings.

• Using real - world topics to jump - start discussions and debates in the classroom • Encouraging students to incorporate text - based evidence in their oral arguments • Learning and mastering academic vocabulary through first - person use • Empowering students of all ability levels to participate in grade - level discussions

That would be too easy though — the real way to win an argument is to use zero facts and just state your opinions and feelings.

You should make it a rule to immediately distrust any argument that uses real - returns (with inflation removed).

My favorite argument that people use to discredit positive reinforcement is «well that is not how the real world works.

One of the arguments often used to justify skins gambling is that virtual items aren't a real currency and thus aren't subject to traditional gaming laws.

So please from all of us here at GamesNosh, don't use the deaths of real people in your Twitter argument about video games.

It's the long time argument about what is better: Playing on real hardware using real cartridges and discs on a real TV, or playing via emulated ROM images on a modern PC.

Your use of strawmen using micro and stand - alone data / arguments doesn't reflect a real world.

Real scientists debate the evidence and don't use namecalling as scientific argument.

His opposition stemmed partly from the valid argument that they impose real hardship on Iranians, but also from the very dubious claim that they make war more likely, and from the legally ridiculous assertion that western use of financial tools to block oil sales «is a financial blockade, and blockades are acts of war.»

So, in case there is now or there will be some newbie to these arguments who may have been confused by the disinformation you (and Memphis) have been producing here, here is an example from a genuine study to remind of what the AGWSF fisics passes off as real physics, as used generally in all the variety of science studies because this has been introduced into the education system and, apart from the applied scientists in the field who can spot this is fake, the majority simply take it as if real physics basics:

I thought explaining how they have taken out the real heat from the Sun because they had to use its measurements for their «backradiation from greenhouse gases» would be the easiest to explain..., the arguments about the second law are interminable because few understand that physics well enough to counter the AGW tweaking of it by several sleights of hand.

But naturally he is a favorite source of the skeptic, who cling to anything, and anyone, that can possibly support their «argument,» or be used to dismiss, ignore or misconstrue the real issue, or relevant facts

Reducing the argument to radiation as if it's «all the same energy» by stripping it of its individual properties and processes, has enabled the swapsies of properties and out of context use of laws to be made in the descriptions of energies, gases and processes, and, so ground into thinking through repetition in the education system that even the absence of the Water Cycle goes unacknowledged as you all busy yourselves arguing about the nuances of your fictional fisics with real world applied scientists who know better.

As for the tone, that argument can be used to dismiss anything coming from Real Climate as well — I can't imagine you would say they are dispassionate.

While one may applaud Popper's conviction that real argument is preferable to the kind of suggestive observations that Wittgenstein and his followers used to throw out, Popper himself has debased the currency of argument by his indiscriminate employment of any argument that comes to hand.

Says lots to me about who is a «real scientist» — to me, when someone uses personal insults, rhetoric and manipulation of the other party's view to «win» the argument, they just shot themselves in the foot.

What is the thing that I really dislike is bringing all kind of new untested theories and approaches to the climate discussion and using them as an argument, when the ideas themselves lack all real evidence to support them.

There is definitely more natural variation in all things than our mainstream scientists give credit for (and this because the math we actually use in calculations «factors out» the variation giving us a Math World rather than a Real World Perspective) Group Think has lead to many disasters in the past and will lead to more in the future if we seek to ridicule those who show us a different perspective on the arguments.

Last but not least a Danish researcher reviewed the potential for leakage and concluded that the «dangers of carbon sequestration are real and the development of this technique should not be used as an argument for continued high fossil fuel emissions.

What I find particularly insidious in the largely manufactured debates over hockey sticks, Climategate, and similar red herrings, is the attempt to portray the real scientific issues as merely matters of opinion, as though choosing to believe Wegman vs. Mann, or Hansen vs. Lindzen, has no more objective validity than one's choice of favorite sports teams (I was going to use political parties, but that's another argument).

But warmists have instead used group think, bandwagon arguments, and other nefarious techniques to prevent real criticism.

Going beyond that conventional wisdom, my argument is that mass - produced items, made at home, made to last, using relatively harmless ingredients, well designed and constructed in compliance with health safety and environment regulations are the real «green» item.

However, because some arguments are dumb, does not imply that all arguments are dumb, and I'm more than happy to argue intelligently with people who have real issues to discuss — but right now those people are being drowned out by the idiots, or the people who are using this to push their own personal agendas.

b) provide a scaling argument comparing the «turbulent viscosity» used in the model to the magnitude one might expect in a real flow.