Pro se litigants complain that lawyers know the rules but don't always follow them,
use rules of evidence to take unfair advantages, bully pro se litigants, resort to trickery when desperate, play buddy buddy with judges to get more favorable decisions, and have access to resources that self - represented parties do not.
... and this is why this country is so backwards and falling behind the rest of the post-industrial countries... and why is it that these... nuts... will
use rules of evidence and «science» to back claims of biblical proof... but reject the same critria when it is used against them?
Not exact matches
The UWC, which
uses a different, lower standard
of evidence than law enforcement to reach a verdict quickly, delivered a
ruling within five months.
There are no public
rulings allowing for the
use of this provision and the public
evidence I could find suggested that 9948.00.00 does not apply.
It was written by many people over the span
of hundreds
of years, it is tribal
rules from the infancy
of our development and arguably is not a good book at all but full
of hatred, spite and unspeakable violence, and you arent allowed to
use «faith» as your proof
of existence... faith is nothing less than the throwing away
of reason i.e. belief without
evidence.
You need to prove, or at least provide real
evidence (scientific method,
rules of evidence), before we can move on to
using The Babble for anything more than fire starter or toilet paper.
It is best understood when scholars apply to it the same
rules of analysis,
evidence and logic
used in philosophy, history and literature.
Can you prove
using the scientific method or justice system's
rules of evidence that the scientific method or justice system's
rules of evidence is the most reliable methods for knowing something?
Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back
of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the
use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding
of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning
of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to
rule the world, etc... But who cares about
evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no
evidence of them existing.
«While some may argue that the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation
used an elephant to swat a fly,» Lipstadt says, «once again it becomes clear that the deniers» claims have no relationship to the most basic
rules of truth and
evidence.»
Using a variant
of instantaneous hazard analysis, we have, however, been able to
rule out differences associated with denominational family and church polity types — that is, the
evidence indicates that denominations with congregational polities are no more and no less likely than denominations with presbyterial or episcopal polities to experience schisms.
If
rule finalized, agency intends to allow the
use of a qualified health claim «as long as there is sufficient
evidence.»
«The home secretary is now running out
of legal options after three appeal court judges unanimously dismissed her challenge,
ruling that «torture is universally abhorred as an evil» and that the UK can not deport Abu Qatada if there is a risk that
evidence gained through forced or violent confessions will be
used against him in a trial.
The values underpinning the constitutional and other legal exclusionary
rules on
evidence was to prevent such unconstitutionality by
using unlawful and fraudulent private anti-corruptionpreneurs like the CEO
of the dummy Tiger Eye or its other illegal variant.
In 2008 the courts
ruled that
using force for these purposes breaches children's human rights because it can cause serious harm and was not shown to be necessary (the court referred to
evidence that in secure children's Homes restraint is not
used to enforce good behaviour by children convicted
of an offence).
It was last
used hundreds
of years ago, but a select committee can draw up
evidence against someone who has committed «high crimes or misdemeanours beyond the
rule of law».
A federal judge handed indicted Albany politician Dean Skelos a pile
of legal defeats Tuesday, tossing out his motion to dismiss two
of his corruption charges and
ruling that prosecutors can
use all the
evidence they scored by wiretapping his cellphone, new court papers state.
«The
use of intercept in
evidence characterises a central dilemma we face as a free society - that
of preserving our liberties and the
rule of law, while at the same time keeping our nation safe and secure,» the prime minister said in a statement to the House
of Commons.
A federal judge
ruled that a conservative group can not get State Department records about Clinton's
use of a private server during her tenure as Secretary
of State because those documents don't show
evidence of government «malfeasance.»
Doug Burns, a former Eastern District prosecutor from Nassau County, said the «cardinal
rule» in the government's
use of a cooperating witness is «whether or not what they say can be backed up or corroborated by other
evidence in the case.»
While we find stronger
evidence that schizophrenia risk predicts cannabis
use, rather than the other way round, it doesn't
rule out a causal risk
of cannabis
use on schizophrenia.
To
rule out the possibility that the unsuccessful search was due to their method, the researchers also
used the same approach to look for
evidence of the dispersal
of aquatic invertebrates.
Experts say similar
evidence could be
used whenever the source
of a fast - mutating virus is at issue, and the case points to the need for an explicit set
of rules governing the
use of such
evidence in the courts.
By
ruling that there is not enough
evidence of «currently accepted medical
use» — a key distinction between the highly restrictive Schedule I classification and the less restrictive Schedule II — the administration essentially makes it harder to gather such
evidence.
Based on the ESO data, the researchers
used Bayes»
Rule, a probability theory that determines the likelihood
of that a theory is true based on new
evidence.
A recent study
using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope found no detection
of hydrogen - dominated atmospheres on planets TRAPPIST - 1d, e and f — another piece
of evidence for rocky composition — although the hydrogen - dominated atmosphere can not be
ruled out for g.
«Because the
evidence provided by eHarmony did not demonstrate that their matching system offered users a significantly greater chance
of finding lasting love than what could be achieved if they didn't
use the service, we concluded that the claim «scientifically proven matching system» was misleading,» the ASA
ruling read.
Jimmy winds up wearing a wire at times and places where common sense indicates it would be discovered, and is saved only by the Bathroom
Rule, which indicates toilets in movies are never
used for biological purposes, but only to dispose
of wires, guns,
evidence, etc..
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant had ordered L.A. Unified to show that it was
using test scores in evaluations by Tuesday after
ruling earlier this year that state law required such data as
evidence of whether teachers have helped their students progress academically.
The U.S. Education Department hopes to get more states, districts, and researchers thinking about
evidence use more deeply with new
rules to apply standards
of research
evidence for school improvement and other projects under the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Yet despite the reams
of evidence debunking the
use of student growth scores in evaluating teachers, and despite these two court
rulings, Judge Moukawsher insisted that rating teachers on student «growth» scores would satisfy his demand that Connecticut's system for hiring, firing, evaluating and compensating teachers be «rational» and «verifiable.»
These provisions strengthen protections for Federal employees who disclose
evidence of waste, fraud, or abuse, and modify
rules on the
use of nondisclosure policies or agreements by government agencies.
It was a near future SF story where there was a perfect «mind reading device» developed but the Supreme Court
ruled that to
use it required strong
evidence of criminal activity and it could be
used only once per suspect.
Looking at the
evidence, it's clear we're overdue for stronger guardrails on how federal aid can be
used, including restoring limits on credit, eliminating certain types
of loans, strengthening institutional and program - level accountability
rules in general, and applying those
rules to institutions based on graduate and parent loan outcomes.
Judicial Panels do not
use technical
rules of evidence.
Using the form
of landscape photography, a tradition born with industrial expansion, these photographs
evidence nature's force as it reclaims land subdued and
ruled by a myopic civilization.
For example, in a court
of law,
rules of evidence greatly limit matters that can be
used to attack witness's credibility to keep the lawyers for delving too far into extraneous matters.
Not necessarily talking about violating FOI here, just that Jones was afraid that FOI could be
used to get the
evidence that something outside
of the stated IPCC
rules had transpired.
Climate scientists are
using the
evidence - based
rules of science to arrive at their conclusions.
AR5 WGI, having insisted, in an unsigned statement on page 26
of B&O's
evidence to the Russell Review, that the Wahl and Ammann paper did not break any
rules in AR4, they could hardly
use the same deadlines this time and expect to get away with it.
As Mashey documents here, so well, this whole party has been a set - up, with scientists on one side, bound by the
rules of evidence and by their own integrity, and think tanks, PR counsellors and their aides and allies on the other side,
using any technique aailable (including, apparently, obtaining,
using and disseminating stolen emails), to defend the right
of fossil fuel companies to continue, unrestrained, in the sale and distribution
of a substance that is threatening the human habitability
of planet earth.
Therefore, it is only adequate
rules of prevention, applicable to discovery and admissibility
of evidence proceedings, that can provide a sufficient opportunity to apply safeguards against inadequate records being
used as
evidence.
Such
evidence should include Canadian trade - mark registrations or
evidence of use in Canada
of common law marks along with a connection to Canada enough to establish the Canadian Presences Requirements under the
rules.
Historically, the LERB reviewed decisions
of chiefs and presiding officers after initial investigations on a standard
of review
of correctness,
using a de novo hearing — the appeal court refers to the lower tribunal's record to determine the facts, but will
rule on the
evidence and questions
of law without deference (respectful submission to the judgment) to the lower tribunal's findings.
The judge who granted leave to appeal acknowledged the decision's «importance to the profession, as well as to the administration
of justice generally», and described the core issue raised by the decision to be whether «pre-approval to
use discovery
evidence under one
of the exceptions contained in [
Rule 30.1] is or is not required»: S.C. v. N.S., 2017 ONSC 2601 at para. 8.
USING ANSWERS
OF WITNESS NOT AVAILABLE FOR TRIAL (17) The trial judge may give a party permission to read into evidence all or part of the answers or information given under rule 20 (questioning) by a person who is unable or unwilling to testify at the trial, but before doing so the judge shall conside
OF WITNESS NOT AVAILABLE FOR TRIAL (17) The trial judge may give a party permission to read into
evidence all or part
of the answers or information given under rule 20 (questioning) by a person who is unable or unwilling to testify at the trial, but before doing so the judge shall conside
of the answers or information given under
rule 20 (questioning) by a person who is unable or unwilling to testify at the trial, but before doing so the judge shall consider,
The best
evidence rule affects both real
evidence, or physical
evidence, and documentary
evidence, or recordings
of information
used as
evidence.
Therefore, the best
evidence rule does not typically come up when photocopies
of a document are
used in court, unless one
of the parties suspects that the copies have been altered through fraud or by mistake.
[19] In this case, there was no «independent» or «other»
evidence of fabrication that would bring the appellant's statements into the exception to the general
rule that a disbelieved alibi can not be
used to support an inference
of guilt.
My note mentioned a provision
of the
rules of procedure
of the tribunal that barred
evidence that violated fundamental rights (
of anybody, apparently), and a section
of the Manitoba Privacy Act that bars the
use in any civil proceeding
of any
evidence obtained by a breach
of privacy as defined in the Act.