Instead,
they use simple diffusion, so they can even enter cells that have become insulin resistant.
Not exact matches
Although scientists have
used a whole array of experimental techniques in the past to investigate the atomic scale details of surface
diffusion, they have generally studied the surfaces of traditional three - dimensional materials and have supported the notion that
diffusion involves a
simple random walk on the surface.
Using a
simple first order Fick's law
diffusion fit on the emissions and concentrations 1958 - 2002 yieds — with an equilibrium value of 280 ppm — a
diffusion constant of 0.98135.
They then estimated the heat flux into the thermocline
using a standard (accepted) model, with a thermocline eddy
diffusion coefficient of 1.2E - 5 m ^ 2 / s from Ledwell: We estimate s by
using this slope along with k = 1.2x10 - 5 m2 / s (the eddy
diffusion coefficient in the thermocline [Ledwell et al., 1998]-RRB- So if they are wrong, either their basic model is wrong (which seems unlikely - it is just a
simple energy balance model after all), or their choice of eddy
diffusion coefficient is wrong.
Incorporating new findings on the radiative forcing of black carbon (BC) aerosols, the magnitude of the climate sensitivity, and the strength of the climate / carbon cycle feedbacks into a
simple upwelling
diffusion / energy balance model similar to the one that was
used in the TAR, we find that the range of projected warming for the 1990 - 2100 period is reduced to 1.1 - 2.8 °C.