Not exact matches
Most of that money was paid out
using traditional single - salary
compensation schedules, a
system that typically pays the same salary to all
teachers with the same level of education and number of years in the classroom.
Meanwhile, in school districts from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles and Seattle,
teacher unions and superintendents have clashed over the
use of new evaluation
systems that base
compensation on student test scores.
The measures of
teacher quality that are
used by most public school
systems to screen candidates and determine
compensation — certification, experience, and education level — have been well researched, but there is little definitive empirical evidence that these characteristics, defined in general terms, are associated with higher student achievement.
The task has proven so difficult that last August, the federal Education Department gave states and districts until the start of the 2013 - 14 school year to have the
systems fully implemented for
use in
teacher compensation and retention decisions.
She has extensive experience in student achievement data analysis, design and implementation of district data
systems, statistical methodologies, and the creation and
use of relational databases in
teacher evaluation and performance - based
compensation reforms.
States and school districts are
using the evaluation
systems to make key personnel decisions about retention, dismissal, and
compensation of
teachers and principals.
«While some of these districts are able to do so because they converted to a performance pay
system, like Washington, D.C., some do so
using a traditional model of
teacher compensation, like Chicago and Milwaukee,» she added.
Strauch - Nelson said «the new
system won't change how the district makes employment decisions or
compensation,» but it «will be
used to tailor support for
teachers and inform professional development.»
Perhaps the strongest model in the United States of a collaborative urban school
system, Cincinnati has a long history dating back to the mid-1980s of experimenting with team - based instructional approaches,
using innovative
compensation systems to reward excellence, and providing career ladders to enable the most effective
teachers to coach their colleagues.
While there is justification for rewarding
teachers based in part on how their students perform,
compensation systems should
use multiple measures, including classroom observation.