Sentences with phrase «use that term in»

Josh Seims, MetaStable's third co-founder, says the fund takes a value investing approach, «sort of what you imagine a Warren Buffett doing, but it's kind of oxymoronic to use these terms in the space because everything is so ephemeral.»
Kane notes that Eli Pariser, former executive director of MoveOn and co-founder of media - curating site Upworthy, has called this «The Filter Bubble,» using the term in both a TED talk viewed by more than 3 million and a 2011 book of the same title.
That's how I'll use the terms in this article.
Given the common association of the word «indoctrinate» with totalitarian methods, there might be at least a «slight suspicion» that Justice Stevens did not use the term in its neutral sense, especially since he nowhere refers to public school indoctrination.
In speaking of the «Persons» in God, we do not use the term in exactly the same way we use it when speaking of people.
The fact that a society — using the terms in its common sense meaning — has no value for itself does not mean that it can have no life of its own.
Doug used the term in a comment above, indicating they're still sticking with that nonsense.
When historians use the term in a narrow sense, «Christian humanism» refers exclusively to the Renaissance — often presented as a departure from Christianity, or even anti-Christian.
He also uses the term in Titus 1:6 - 9 and it is assumed he means «continence» but he might not.
(To obviate all misunderstanding, I must explain that I am using this term in the sense frequently given it by Anglo - Saxon theologians, who see «radicalism» as rooted in the tradition (Bishop Robinson, the death - of - God theologians).
I am using the terms in an evolutionary context.
But does Whitehead use the term in this way?
It is only creationists that use that term in an effort to try to put holes in valid science.
To cite but one obvious instance, when in 1934 John Dewey wrote A Common Faith, he assumed that the hegemony (to use a term in academic fashion today) of Christianity was over.
And I use that term in the sense that «FAITH HAPPENED!»
However, since Hartshorne is clearly thinking of the sort of change that consists of first being in one state, and then at some temporally latter moment being in a different state, I shall use the term in that way.
For example, when Pope John XXIII spoke of medical care as a «right,» he used that term in a far different sense from the use of «right» in, say, the Declaration of Independence and in the Bill of Rights.
What emerges from this study is that Jesus in the Synoptics appears to use the term in three senses: in reference to his own earthly mission, as the transcendent one as in Enoch but without definite self - designation; and as the latter referring to himself.
When you say «payer», you are using the term in a way that belies ignorance to the proper use of the term in the medical / insurance industry — just so we're clear.
Although he did not use the term in the traditional sense, he said that the first way that God reveals himself can be called a form of general revelation.
We are using the term in its true sense, to mean the disclosure of an objective personal reality.
I'm not using that term in an attempt to inflame, by the way.
To use terms in a meaningful sense, we are told, requires an experiential grounding for those terms.
I was simply using the term in accord with two of the four meanings listed in Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary.
Newman even uses the term in a letter to Wood when he talks of a lawyer «whose ethos I trust».
At any rate, Tonnies, who first coined the word «Gemeinschaft» as a sociological category, used the term in both a descriptive and a critical sense.
In the light of the whole Gospel, however, we may feel free to use the term in its most natural sense.
Jesus himself was using the term in this way when he said that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath; therefore the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.
Asbury, similarly, is well - aware of the negative cultural associations attached to recklessness for many but was using the term in a different way.
As we have had occasion to use the term in previous discussion, based on its usual Platonic connotation it did not mean the «erotic» in a sexual sense, but any longing for what is prized.
I've already saved some recipes and I'm going to try them, but unfortunately, I've got one problem — I don't know exactly how to understand «cup»: (I'm from Poland, we don't use this term in our kitchens often and I want to keep appropriate proportions, so I hope that there is a chance to give me a small tip how I can deal with it — maybe in relation to number of tbsp?
Stuttgart defender and German wunderkind — hey, look at that, that's the first time I was able to use that term in a linguistically correct manner — Antonio Rudiger has already landed in Rome to take his medical ahead of his loan spell with the Giallorossi.
In addition, the committee formulated a definition of a flagrant foul, an often - used term in the rules book but which previously was not specifically defined.
ILCA Style Guidelines for Written Professional Resources: This document sets standards for commonly used terms in our profession.
nobody wants to use that term in a school, but the rebates that make the companies so much money are the same thing.
I used to work for the company and saw the cartons of finished product which clearly had the label «BPI Lean Finely Textured Beef» on them; I don't know where you got your info on the large sums of money etc etc. (2) I didn't say Bettina came up with the term; I said she used the term in her petition.
However, the Ministry of Justice, Jack Straw's own department, has itself used the term in official documents, as has the Home Office.
He has used this term in the past to refer to Fethullah Gulen, a US - based Muslim cleric he accuses of fomenting unrest.
Various special interests — and I use that term in the loosest of fashions, not necessarily in the axis of evil definition a certain governor has adopted to refer to a select few groups — are using this Hallmark holiday in hopes of breaking through the cacophony at the Capitol at the height of budget season.
I am using these terms in what I hope is a neutral way - but you can't please all the people all the time.
Prresident Obama used the term in a speech extolling the law.
We can presume, surely, that this is the only draft Constitution (using the term in a modern sense) to have been authored in our island home by an official government!
John Burnheim, an Australian philosophy professor, was the first to use the term in relation with sortition.
The article makes a good point when it criticizes the term «third party», even though they use that term in the title of their article.
Sigmund Freud believed that some narcissism is an essential part of all of us from birth and was the first to use the term in the reference to psychology.
He uses this term in reference to several publications, and it is wrong.
Or is Trenberth using the term in a tighter sense, more like Louise in this thread, whose definition would exclude all «climate sceptics», leaving only Lord Monckton and possibly a couple of others as identifiable «deniers»?
Nevertheless, in practice, «micron» remains a widely used term in preference to «micrometre» in many English - speaking countries, both in academic science (including geology, biology, physics, and astronomy) and in applied science and industry (including machining, the semiconductor industry, and plastics manufacturing).
Hmm, I recall that Judith Curry used that term in reference to DC...
The way I used the terms in this paragraph are how I typically see those terms being used..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z