Sentences with phrase «use to anyone saying»

Not exact matches

None of this is to say anyone is justified in behaving like a high school bully; successful gossips know their audience and use their powers for good.
Here are a handful of strategies they say anyone can use to achieve transformation in business and life.
Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky, in a tweet and Facebook post Saturday night, said the home - sharing company would use its 3 million listings to help provide free housing to refugees and anyone outside their home country who is denied entry to the U.S.
«Because we built a technology platform that anyone can use, you begin to see these really cool sociological trends emerge,» says Mendelsohn.
Eventually, we'll all get used to it, Martin says — especially since many of the tasks AI will take over are the business equivalent of household drudgery: «You never hear anyone complain about the invention of the dishwasher.»
«A lot» is a piece of land, or so said many of my high school English teachers whenever anyone used «a lot» to describe an amount.
«Prior to this decision, any decent prosecutor could have indicted anyone in the United States for anything using that statute,» Razzano says.
Anyone who says such things misses that once scientists publish their results, anyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global waAnyone who says such things misses that once scientists publish their results, anyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global waanyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global waanyone — can use the results to work on global warming.
First things first: Before you bring up the topic with anyone else, it's important to get in the habit of using positive language around money, says Leanne Jacobs, holistic wealth expert and author of «Beautiful Money.»
Eich has said his company plans to release the code behind the tokens as open source so that anyone can build publishing systems or services that use them for payment.
Peele, BuzzFeed, and Monkeypaw Productions used a controversial but widely available software to make the video, in an effort to demonstrate the dangers of «deepfakes,» aka digitally manipulated videos that have the power to «make it look like anyone is saying [or doing] anything at any point in time,» that didn't actually happen.
A person familiar with the matter said: «Google is committed to expanding access to gender neutral facilities across its offices so that anyone can use the restroom of their choice.»
«Criminals use U.S. shell companies to commit financial fraud, drug trafficking, even terrorist financing, in part because our states don't require anyone to name the owners of the companies they form,» Levin said in an email to Reuters.
On his way to Calgary last week, Harper was telling anyone who would listen that he was shocked at Wright's decision, taken alone and shared with — well, he used to say Wright shared his decision with nobody, but that story won't stand up any more, so these days he says Wright shared it with «a very few» PMO staffers, and at any rate certainly not with Harper himself.
On the call, Musk described a world in which people share their cars, offering them as either a Lyft, an Uber or something like a Lyft / Uber - Airbnb combo «where you can own your car and have 100 percent usage of your car,» Musk said, and specify that it's available to anyone who wants to use it while you're not using it.
«I find it incredibly hard to find anyone that will vocally admit they still use Uber,» she said.
Are we saying that every food vendor must allow restroom access to anyone, not just customers, who wants to use one?
(Ritholtz is no stranger to social media — TED Talks credits his Big Picture blog as one of «100 websites you should know and use,» while Matt Miller of Bloomberg says Ritholtz «consistently makes more sense than anyone else in media» and Randall Forsyth of Barron's calls The Big Picture «a must - read blog.»)
Cohen emphasizes that he used his own personal funds to «facilitate» the payment, but he doesn't directly say that he wasn't reimbursed by anyone.
Christian Concern has said that «everybody knows sharia law is discriminatory», however a Muslim interfaith worker who used to be employed by Blackburn Cathedral has said that Sharia law is about looking after your neighbour and not harming anyone.
I used to work in retail / service industry for almost 10 years and not once did anyone ever get mad that I said Merry Christmas to them.
The Pope has said he would «punch» anyone in the face who insulted his mother, using the hypothetical point to suggest there are limits to freedom of expression,...
No one is stopping anyone from using birth control, natural methods, or»em ergency» contraception; they are simply saying I don't want to provide it for you.
«Since there is no empirical way to show that one host is consecrated while another is not — consecrated hosts do not glow in the dark — there is also no way for anyone but the organizers to know whether a host used in a black mass has been consecrated or not,» Clooney said.
I do not begrudge anyone the comfort of religion, but I can't say as I'm a fan of those who would use their faith as a tool to rationalize the condemnation of this and that from a fiery problem.
They should shut their blasted mouths and just sit there, because far too many pastors are so used to hearing what comes out of their own arrogant mouths that they can't even consider what anyone else says and don't think it to be worth the time to listen.
While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.
No one say anyone HAS TO DO anything, what is being said is IT»S AVAILABLE if ONE WANTS to USE ITO DO anything, what is being said is IT»S AVAILABLE if ONE WANTS to USE Ito USE IT.
Three days from now, nobody will even remember what anyone else said on here, much less what name he / she used to post it.
People who use the technology must not only be carefully trained — and untrained counselors don't need machines in order to harm people — but they also should consider the view of Arthur Gladman, a psychiatrist who says that anyone who uses biofeedback must be aware of its tremendous spiritual potential for self - transformation.
But I just don't believe that anyone could be so stupid as to say such a thing over the internet, using a computer.
We fall for anything, hate everything, curse people to heII when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claim victory for hurting anyone who's not a Christians feelings, while standing for bigotry and racism, but will gladly use poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grader.
Bultmann himself is alive to this consequence, for he says at one point: «Anyone who asserts that to speak of an act of God at all is to use mythological language is bound to regard the idea of an act of God in Christ as a myth.
5 But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is «devoted to God,» 6 they are not to «honor their father or mother» with it.
I try to cultivate an atmosphere where anyone can have a say on anything, with the realisation that everyone has the right to obey, ignore, or use those thoughts as they see fit.
Since you brought it up go back to 21:12 and note it says if anyone strikes a man then observe it is left open ended such that a rod, stick etc as you suggest could be used.
Purpose: Mark says, first, that Pilate had established an open Passover amnesty: «At the festival he used to release a prisoner for them, anyone for whom they asked» (158).
Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»
My dad used to say if it doesn't hurt anyone and is not hugely distorting scripture but makes them feel closer to God, don't knock it as it is better than them being in the world and maybe using foul language and going to hell.
I am only saying that was not particularly inspirational to anyone but perhaps yourself, and others who want to use it to bolster their own beliefs.
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Anyone who says this country used to be more reflective of Christian values is flat - out wrong, and it worries me when people advocate a return to the «good old days.»
Things are not good in the Church in the West, and anyone who wants to discuss that has plenty to say and plenty of material to use.
The clergy knows no more about God than anyone else, they prove it again and again by always being willing to talk but saying nothing of any use.
fred... yes fred, i have a better way — but you sir, i have no need to keep this conversation going, for you are terribly thick headed, and beyond brainwashed by religion... you claim to believe the bible and what is has to say yet allow for me to be a di - ck to god without fear of recourse or any form of punishment from god — back in the day, i would have been smoted, now you losers claim that he will just torture me forever in hell as my punishment — this implies that god has learned better ways to function as god — whoa, did anyone else just see what i said, god learned... thats rather un-godly, to learn, being he is all knowing - but your right, i am wrong... jesus christ where did i put my fuk you card, oh god - dam - nit... i must have thrown it away with all the other garbage i don't use... well too bad.
I think that anyone with common sense will see that this statement, coupled with the current social landscape proves the hypocrisy of those who use the bible to condemn their fellow man: «A literal reading of the Bible was used to justify all sorts of hatred: slavery, the subjugation of women and anti-Semitism, scholars and pastors say
For anyone for is converting to vegan I say used these recipes.
I never hear anyone say, «Oh, I used to eat spicy food, but now I'm back to bland.»
The cocoa mixture in my case was not «smooth» in the way a ganache would be, I say this to anyone using organic cane sugar vs. traditional domino / white sugar, which has a finer grain.
Neither the individual contributor, subsequent contributors, nor the original poster if a reply, nor anyone else connected to MCM can take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information or disinformation presented within said posts.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z