Not exact matches
None of this is
to say anyone is justified in behaving like a high school bully; successful gossips know their audience and
use their powers for good.
Here are a handful of strategies they
say anyone can
use to achieve transformation in business and life.
Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky, in a tweet and Facebook post Saturday night,
said the home - sharing company would
use its 3 million listings
to help provide free housing
to refugees and
anyone outside their home country who is denied entry
to the U.S.
«Because we built a technology platform that
anyone can
use, you begin
to see these really cool sociological trends emerge,»
says Mendelsohn.
Eventually, we'll all get
used to it, Martin
says — especially since many of the tasks AI will take over are the business equivalent of household drudgery: «You never hear
anyone complain about the invention of the dishwasher.»
«A lot» is a piece of land, or so
said many of my high school English teachers whenever
anyone used «a lot»
to describe an amount.
«Prior
to this decision, any decent prosecutor could have indicted
anyone in the United States for anything
using that statute,» Razzano
says.
Anyone who says such things misses that once scientists publish their results, anyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global wa
Anyone who
says such things misses that once scientists publish their results,
anyone — you, me, anyone — can use the results to work on global wa
anyone — you, me,
anyone — can use the results to work on global wa
anyone — can
use the results
to work on global warming.
First things first: Before you bring up the topic with
anyone else, it's important
to get in the habit of
using positive language around money,
says Leanne Jacobs, holistic wealth expert and author of «Beautiful Money.»
Eich has
said his company plans
to release the code behind the tokens as open source so that
anyone can build publishing systems or services that
use them for payment.
Peele, BuzzFeed, and Monkeypaw Productions
used a controversial but widely available software
to make the video, in an effort
to demonstrate the dangers of «deepfakes,» aka digitally manipulated videos that have the power
to «make it look like
anyone is
saying [or doing] anything at any point in time,» that didn't actually happen.
A person familiar with the matter
said: «Google is committed
to expanding access
to gender neutral facilities across its offices so that
anyone can
use the restroom of their choice.»
«Criminals
use U.S. shell companies
to commit financial fraud, drug trafficking, even terrorist financing, in part because our states don't require
anyone to name the owners of the companies they form,» Levin
said in an email
to Reuters.
On his way
to Calgary last week, Harper was telling
anyone who would listen that he was shocked at Wright's decision, taken alone and shared with — well, he
used to say Wright shared his decision with nobody, but that story won't stand up any more, so these days he
says Wright shared it with «a very few» PMO staffers, and at any rate certainly not with Harper himself.
On the call, Musk described a world in which people share their cars, offering them as either a Lyft, an Uber or something like a Lyft / Uber - Airbnb combo «where you can own your car and have 100 percent usage of your car,» Musk
said, and specify that it's available
to anyone who wants
to use it while you're not
using it.
«I find it incredibly hard
to find
anyone that will vocally admit they still
use Uber,» she
said.
Are we
saying that every food vendor must allow restroom access
to anyone, not just customers, who wants
to use one?
(Ritholtz is no stranger
to social media — TED Talks credits his Big Picture blog as one of «100 websites you should know and
use,» while Matt Miller of Bloomberg
says Ritholtz «consistently makes more sense than
anyone else in media» and Randall Forsyth of Barron's calls The Big Picture «a must - read blog.»)
Cohen emphasizes that he
used his own personal funds
to «facilitate» the payment, but he doesn't directly
say that he wasn't reimbursed by
anyone.
Christian Concern has
said that «everybody knows sharia law is discriminatory», however a Muslim interfaith worker who
used to be employed by Blackburn Cathedral has
said that Sharia law is about looking after your neighbour and not harming
anyone.
I
used to work in retail / service industry for almost 10 years and not once did
anyone ever get mad that I
said Merry Christmas
to them.
The Pope has
said he would «punch»
anyone in the face who insulted his mother,
using the hypothetical point
to suggest there are limits
to freedom of expression,...
No one is stopping
anyone from
using birth control, natural methods, or»em ergency» contraception; they are simply
saying I don't want
to provide it for you.
«Since there is no empirical way
to show that one host is consecrated while another is not — consecrated hosts do not glow in the dark — there is also no way for
anyone but the organizers
to know whether a host
used in a black mass has been consecrated or not,» Clooney
said.
I do not begrudge
anyone the comfort of religion, but I can't
say as I'm a fan of those who would
use their faith as a tool
to rationalize the condemnation of this and that from a fiery problem.
They should shut their blasted mouths and just sit there, because far too many pastors are so
used to hearing what comes out of their own arrogant mouths that they can't even consider what
anyone else
says and don't think it
to be worth the time
to listen.
While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing
to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be
used to respond
to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down
to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for
anyone.
No one
say anyone HAS
TO DO anything, what is being said is IT»S AVAILABLE if ONE WANTS to USE I
TO DO anything, what is being
said is IT»S AVAILABLE if ONE WANTS
to USE I
to USE IT.
Three days from now, nobody will even remember what
anyone else
said on here, much less what name he / she
used to post it.
People who
use the technology must not only be carefully trained — and untrained counselors don't need machines in order
to harm people — but they also should consider the view of Arthur Gladman, a psychiatrist who
says that
anyone who
uses biofeedback must be aware of its tremendous spiritual potential for self - transformation.
But I just don't believe that
anyone could be so stupid as
to say such a thing over the internet,
using a computer.
We fall for anything, hate everything, curse people
to heII when left with nothing
to say, then hysterically claim victory for hurting
anyone who's not a Christians feelings, while standing for bigotry and racism, but will gladly
use poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grader.
Bultmann himself is alive
to this consequence, for he
says at one point: «
Anyone who asserts that
to speak of an act of God at all is
to use mythological language is bound
to regard the idea of an act of God in Christ as a myth.
5 But you
say that if
anyone declares that what might have been
used to help their father or mother is «devoted
to God,» 6 they are not
to «honor their father or mother» with it.
I try
to cultivate an atmosphere where
anyone can have a
say on anything, with the realisation that everyone has the right
to obey, ignore, or
use those thoughts as they see fit.
Since you brought it up go back
to 21:12 and note it
says if
anyone strikes a man then observe it is left open ended such that a rod, stick etc as you suggest could be
used.
Purpose: Mark
says, first, that Pilate had established an open Passover amnesty: «At the festival he
used to release a prisoner for them,
anyone for whom they asked» (158).
Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden
to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way,
to anything (or
anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared
to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might
use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except
to improve it - before he comes of age.»
My dad
used to say if it doesn't hurt
anyone and is not hugely distorting scripture but makes them feel closer
to God, don't knock it as it is better than them being in the world and maybe
using foul language and going
to hell.
I am only
saying that was not particularly inspirational
to anyone but perhaps yourself, and others who want
to use it
to bolster their own beliefs.
I am going
to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on
anyone's right
to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies
to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has
to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want
to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected
to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due
to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had
used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible
say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Anyone who
says this country
used to be more reflective of Christian values is flat - out wrong, and it worries me when people advocate a return
to the «good old days.»
Things are not good in the Church in the West, and
anyone who wants
to discuss that has plenty
to say and plenty of material
to use.
The clergy knows no more about God than
anyone else, they prove it again and again by always being willing
to talk but
saying nothing of any
use.
fred... yes fred, i have a better way — but you sir, i have no need
to keep this conversation going, for you are terribly thick headed, and beyond brainwashed by religion... you claim
to believe the bible and what is has
to say yet allow for me
to be a di - ck
to god without fear of recourse or any form of punishment from god — back in the day, i would have been smoted, now you losers claim that he will just torture me forever in hell as my punishment — this implies that god has learned better ways
to function as god — whoa, did
anyone else just see what i
said, god learned... thats rather un-godly,
to learn, being he is all knowing - but your right, i am wrong... jesus christ where did i put my fuk you card, oh god - dam - nit... i must have thrown it away with all the other garbage i don't
use... well too bad.
I think that
anyone with common sense will see that this statement, coupled with the current social landscape proves the hypocrisy of those who
use the bible
to condemn their fellow man: «A literal reading of the Bible was
used to justify all sorts of hatred: slavery, the subjugation of women and anti-Semitism, scholars and pastors
say.»
For
anyone for is converting
to vegan I
say used these recipes.
I never hear
anyone say, «Oh, I
used to eat spicy food, but now I'm back
to bland.»
The cocoa mixture in my case was not «smooth» in the way a ganache would be, I
say this
to anyone using organic cane sugar vs. traditional domino / white sugar, which has a finer grain.
Neither the individual contributor, subsequent contributors, nor the original poster if a reply, nor
anyone else connected
to MCM can take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt
to use or adopt any of the information or disinformation presented within
said posts.