Sentences with phrase «use your judgment as»

Use your judgment as to how much should be used, however.

You just have to use your judgment as to the amount you need.

You just have to use some judgment as to what will be most effective in that line.

I put rule in quotation marks there because the real rule is to know the norms if you're in a specialized market and then use your judgment as to the best way to present yourself.

You have to use your judgment as to whether putting up with some crazy person is worth your time and energy.

Not exact matches

As I got used to the new surroundings and stopped fearing others» judgment in the hopes of just focusing on improvement, I noticed something.

Nordstrom empowers their employees to do whatever it takes to please the customer, as long as they use their best judgment to decide on a plan of action.

But while manned aircraft can usually fight back against signal jamming, and pilots in a cockpit can always use their own judgment if communications or navigation is lost, jamming could pose a serious threat to the US Navy's drones, as there's no one in the cockpit, according to Lamrani.

In making these determinations, the Compensation Committee may consult with its independent compensation consultant and management, as described below; however, the Compensation Committee uses its own judgment in making final decisions regarding the compensation paid to our executive officers.

Goldman (gs) is using software developed internally to mine resumes for attributes that reflect desired qualities, such as teamwork, integrity, and judgment, according to people familiar with the matter.

Shkreli funded the Merrill Lynch settlement — and avoided the filing of the confessions of judgment — by causing a $ 900,000 investment in Retrophin equity securities made by MSMB Healthcare to be recharacterized as a «loan,» causing the «loan» to be repaid with interest, and using the «loan» proceeds together with other money taken from Retrophin to pay Merrill Lynch.

«We trust highly trained educators to use their professional judgment to make decisions in the best interests of children, particularly given that this policy applies to children as young as five years of age,» Kenney said in a press conference on November 2.

For their judgment arises from a basic inability to understand, hence to cooperate with, those who use the tactic of nonviolence as others use the tactic of violence.

«[Wheaton College] has failed to show that delaying a judgment in its favor to the conclusion of proceedings in the district court would do the college any harm... The college has also failed to match the relief it seeks to the illegalities it alleges... the government isn't using the college's health plans, as we have explained at perhaps excessive length.»

Part of the problem the way the question is posed is by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical judgments!

For as we have seen throughout this investigation, there can be no use of violence without hate, without judgment, without abomination.

It is no longer true as it used to be, that the judgment of the masses is like foam on water — nonsense, though loudly proclaimed; blind, though sharply decisive; impossible to follow because it changes more swiftly than a woman changes color.

Well, the poster used some emotionally charged phrases (never understood, hypocrisy, shut up) but I have always agreed with two fundamental points they raised, which I will state as quickly as possible for your consideration, no pressure or judgment intended:

Not long ago I corresponded with him about his intent in using the phrase, and was confirmed in my judgment that he only meant to say that ministers should be as ready of access to persons burdened with guilt and other negative feelings as are Roman Catholic priests.

As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).

Precisely in acknowledging God's primordial will as represented by Jesus, one necessarily pronounces a truth - judgment about Jesus» revelatory function — or, to use the traditional term, office.

Stop using Bobs name to attack him, I have to restate that I am sorry for all the hurt I have caused and am in a spot in my life that I am really unhappy with my marriage and have to many hormones running through me right now to really make good judgments so I want publicly apologize to Bob and say that while I do nt believe in God as yet have started to read my Bible that I bought the other day and am considering becoming a Christian.

For when war is used as a form of divine judgment, a pacifist's opposition to God's rod of correction would effectively be resisting the will of God.

Fourth, as used in most evangelical discussion, the term is a philosophical judgment controlled by categories alien to Scripture; it is a slogan based on «how God ought to have inspired the Word» which has been substituted for careful patient analysis of what the Bible does teach about itself.

After describing in some detail the principle of complementarity in physics, Austin suggests that images of God as Father and as Judge are complementary models used to interpret individual and corporate experience.24 The prophet Amos, he points out, interpreted events in Israel's history primarily in terms of God's judgment, while Hosea understood events in terms of God's forgiveness.

To use more accurate, but as yet unknown, judgments in nonrevelatory matters would, in fact, have distracted the hearers» attention away from the intended revelational point.

As the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [NuAs the Lausanne Covenant asserts, the Bible is «without error in all that it affirms» Although detailed inerrantists like John Montgomery and Harold Lindsell resist referring to the writer's intentions as a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [Nuas a criterion for Biblical judgment, sensing, rightly, that its adoption undermines their position, they nevertheless use such a standard on occasion (see Lindsell's discussion of differences in Biblical numbers [Num.

And if you want to use me as a «reason,» well, you know, that's what many of the Sanhedrine will say on judgment day: «But God, that nasty mouthed Steven, it is his fault, he call us «stiff - necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and ear.»

On a philosophical level we can use the relationship of the tree and the boy as a way to remind ourselves of the very different judgments produced by utilitarian and deontological ethical systems.

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in ScripturAs to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripturas referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

Even in the case of the so - called «testimony of the senses,» this counts as «testimony» only if it is used to support a judgment which goes beyond the mere recording of facts.

Even as the king uses his servant's own description to render judgment against him, he points out that there was an alternative — small - scale money - lending — which would have satisfied his command.

A church which knows that it is not self - sufficient nor secure in righteousness but dependent on God for judgment and renewal as well as for life will expect him to use as instruments of his judgment the opponents and critics of Christianity.

It is sure, just as every simple man is sure, that some states of mind are inwardly superior to others, and reveal to us more truth, and in this it simply makes use of an ordinary spiritual judgment.

The use of punishment as a deterrent, and the effect of the penal system upon persons and society as a whole, raise issues for moral judgment.

Our ideal may function as the law and judgment which we use against ourselves.

Israel's religious leaders had been moving towards monotheism, and the prophetic idea that Yahweh was using Israel's enemies as his agents in bringing judgment on his sinful people was a long step towards recognition of his universal sway.

The only novelty may come in breaking away from the clichés that have come to pervade our discussion of law and in recovering what judges used to understand as the axioms of reason that supplied the grounds of their judgments.

The lawmakers have always used physcs judgment now that there is none the gays have actually exploited the void because as we all know the law makers cater to whoever screams the loudest»

Does the very use of the concept «pluralism» smuggle an evaluative judgment into what presents itself as a descriptive account of factors that make a theological school concrete?

Besides the conditions of society itself, under which family and friends had primary responsibility for the care of the dying and the dead, memento mon were spread throughout culture: in the church's art, in morality plays like Everyman, in drinking songs, in the ordinary artifacts of everyday life (e.g., in Austria a towel hanger portraying a human form split down the middle: one half a beautiful young woman, the other a skeleton) To be sure, the specter of death (and judgment) has been used as a form of social control.

Austere as well as paternal, authoritative and kingly as well as merciful and gracious, terrific in judgment against selfishness, cruelty, and sham as well as forgiving to outcasts and prodigals, Jesus» God was revealed not so much in the words he used about him as in the life he lived with him.

That is, what criterion for judgment is used in discovering Christ as the central message of each of the Bible's books?

But many Christians also «use» the threat of God's judgment and their own interpretation of Scripture (which they equate with God) as a way of feeling superior to others and getting brownie points in the Kingdom.

He pronounced judgment only on lust — that is, sex without mutual love which uses another as an «it.»

Yet, not only is Chris Conlee judging his close friend, but he is using this friendship as a reason we are supposed to trust his judgment: «As one of my closest friends and partners in ministry, I can assure you that I have total confidence in the redemptive process Andy went through under his leadership in Texas.&raquas a reason we are supposed to trust his judgment: «As one of my closest friends and partners in ministry, I can assure you that I have total confidence in the redemptive process Andy went through under his leadership in Texas.&raquAs one of my closest friends and partners in ministry, I can assure you that I have total confidence in the redemptive process Andy went through under his leadership in Texas.»

It would ne nice to accept our own moral compasses or as I put it «a morally correct manner» and then leave it at that, accept only detailed proven facts and then use your best judgment on the rest, its more likely to be right then listening or reading «facts» by those who tell you to not look for them or prove them one way r the other, that's the Fox News of the religious world... Religion is more dangerous then a blind man in a room of razors, it hurts, kills and destroys more of humanity then any «God Made» disaster.

Instead of threatening his audience with the judgment of God, as he did in the Prague manifesto, Muentzer used the language of humility and personal experience to communicate his thoughts.

Jazmine, this is really best when served immediately, but as always, please use your best judgment.

I made this soup for 50 people for a very special New Year's Day dish — the MAIN dish I was serving, for my Housewarming Party, as well as New Year's day... and I used the amount of honey it called for — against my better judgment — and it was HORRIBLE.