Not exact matches
* Crucially, both
Chancel / Piketty and the CERP approach highlight progressivity, and both do so by
using exemption thresholds (just like the exemption level in an income tax) below which an individual is judged to have no capacity, or obligation, to expend their meager resources in fighting the climate threat.
3) More generally, the
Chancel / Piketty proposal is strongly consistent with an approach that
uses quantitative indicators to represent fundamental equity principles in order to operationalize equity.
* Finally, both
Chancel / Piketty and the CERP approach can be
used to support a variety of «progressive» approaches.
From
Chancel and Piketty (2015) The left - hand graph shows the per - capita emissions in the way they are conventionally calculated and the right - hand graph shows the emissions corrected to account for the emissions
used to make imported goods.