It's
used ad nauseum in Halo Top's marketing materials.
Some scenarios are built with an entirely different asset bank, that in the hands of another developer, would have been
used ad nauseum to get their money's worth.
I appreciate what you are saying but this is the same stuff that is
used ad nauseum as a defense of seeking something true and beyond oneself.
Not exact matches
To claim some land should be yours today just because it
used to be long ago, before you were conquered, is silly, since those who you conquered could say the same, and so on,
ad nauseum.
I've long had a soft spot for our diminutive right - sided speedster, and
used to get fed up with the
ad nauseum criticism of him online from certain quarters.
An integrated campaign will
use each for the right purposes: social media for outreach and day - to - day supporter engagement, online advertising for recruiting and turnout, email for fundraising and activation, analytics to guide the campaign outreach, grassroots canvassing to contact voters one to one, the candidate's kids / pets to humanize him or her, etc etc
ad nauseum.
For instance, you went on at length at how the iPad
uses a now old 4:3 aspect ratio, but then in Zinio you opened a magazine that is published in 4:3 ratio and then went on
ad nauseum about how bad the black spaces on the 16:9 screen on the Acer looked.
(Most give me plenty of reasons not to, i.e.
using bullshit DBAs instead of informing people their stuff is self - published consistently and immediately, or buying bullshit «awards» from Readers Favorites,
ad nauseum, and other similar CRIMES.)
Mona Hatoum
uses old - school video equipment, circa 1983, in her installation «There's so much I want to say,» which features a heavily pixilated face repeating those words every seven seconds,
ad nauseum.
I have written many times about how Lewandowsky
uses Argument from Authority
ad nauseum along with
ad hominems, and lightly seasoned with Argument from Ignorance.
Indeed, as this blog has also pointed out,
ad nauseum, the notion of the scientific consensus is
used in political and policy debates at all levels, with no regard for the substance of the consensus.
Most of this is just mildly annoying, but in my opinion, the language he
uses in some of the messages he repeats
ad nauseum is patently dishonest.
What's boring is having to scroll past reams of posts spouting nonsense that's been heard
ad nauseum before, posts refuting such nonsense
using arguments that needn't be given because they're talking to the denier's hand, and others talking about the knowledge, mind sets and motives of the deniers.
Some icons
use drop shadows, some icons are flat, some icons are circles, some squares, some squircles,
ad nauseum.