Sentences with phrase «used against an employer»

But there was even an effort in that legislation that was being proposed by the government to ensure that we would see coercive powers used against workers rather than used against employers who were intentionally underpaying those workers or other workers in the labour market.

The idea is to ensure that an offer of settlement can not be used against an employer in a standard unfair dismissal case.

Not exact matches

Bt as a rule using a work computer for personal reasons or doing work on a personal computer (or tablet or smartphone) can significantly change the threat level that an employer has to protect itself against.

It should be against the law (and in some states it is) for employers to use Credit Checks / Reports to qualify for employment.

Without admitting the charge, the employer changed its absolute rule against religious use of drugs, and it paid Smith and Black some of their lost pay.

Mo one is saying that employees can't use contraceptives, just don't make the employer pay for them when it goes against their belief, it should be up to the business.

Many employers in these states, as well as in others where this sort of open sale and use is still against the law, simply decided to turn a blind eye to marijuana testing, opting instead for clear clauses in contracts that stipulate that employees may not show up for work under the influence.

My goal is for the law to pertain to any «lactating women», so employers can not use the law to discriminate against a bereaved mother whose already experiencing unfathomable grief.

Employers may not suspend, fire, or discriminate against an employee for using these rights.

«I plan to use the next 12 months to get the government to act against these rogue bosses and to encourage employers to take their responsibilities to their staff seriously.»

Dan Watkins, director of Contact Law, commented: «The introduction of «protected conversations» will offer employers the chance to have frank conversations with staff about their performances without fear of their every word being scrutinised and potentially used against them in a tribunal.

But, Hubbard emphasises, this information is likely to be used by employers to discriminate against them.

She also introduced to the Forum a newly enacted law, GINA («Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act»), which protects against health insurance companies and employers using genetic information to discriminate against individuals or families.

As Bagley wrote on his blog, «Employers aren't supposed to use that kind of information to discriminate against you.

GINA also allows people to participate in research studies without fear that their employers or health insurance companies might use DNA information against them.

In the U.S., the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (Gina), signed by President Bush last May, makes it illegal for employers and health insurers to use their employees» or customers» genetic information to discriminate against them.

The high court will also use an employment - discrimination case from the private sector to clarify whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the main federal job - discrimination law, covers retaliation by employers against former employees as well as job applicants...

If a refund is not applied for and there is an unused balance then the employer can apply to HMRC to use this against any forthcoming PAYE debt.

And parents are particularly worried that colleges or employers could use their children's information against them when making enrollment or hiring decisions.

As for the blog comments, the Internet is forever and whatever you type on a blog or website, or post on a video site, can be used against you, be it by former friends, snippy in - laws, potential employers, or what - have - you.

You are not required to disclose information about your bankruptcy to any employer, and it can not be used by employers to discriminate against you.

Get the facts about how both existing and potential employers could use bad credit against you.

And while a growing number of state laws restrict the circumstances under which an employer can discriminate against job applicants on the basis of credit history (see endnotes for a list of state statutes), federal law permits employers to use credit history as a basis for denying employment.5

Employers may not (a) directly or indirectly require, request, suggest or cause any employee or prospective employee to submit a consumer credit report or other credit information as a condition of employment; (b) use, accept, refer to or inquire concerning a consumer credit report or credit information; (c) discharge, discipline, or discriminate against any individual who refuses or declines to submit a credit report; or retaliate against any individual who files a complaint or exercises his / her rights under this statute.

It is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to obtain or use for employment purposes information contained in the credit history of an applicant for employment or an employee, or to refuse to hire, discharge, demote, suspend, retaliate or otherwise discriminate against an applicant or an employee with regard to promotion, compensation, or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment based on information in the credit history of the applicant or employee.

Today we're used to seeing ramps and retrofitting in public spaces to allow accessibility, and it's taken for granted that employers can't discriminate against those with disabilities.

80 % of the revenue would be returned via rebates to households and employers, while 20 % would be used to fund green infrastructure investments in transportation, clean energy, and protection against the impacts of climate change.

Despite his successful claim against the MoD, Anum still feels betrayed by his former employers: «It can't fix the pain that I'm going through now, all the benefit and entitlements that I used to get from the Army.

The opinion recites four considerations that would tend to establish an ethical duty for a lawyer to warn the client against using a business device or system for electronic communication: Where the client has already communicated by electronic means or has indicated an intention to do so; where the client is employed in a position that would provide access to a workplace device or system; given the circumstances, the employer or a third party has the ability to access the email communications and; that as far as the lawyer knows, the employer's internal policy and the jurisdiction's laws do not clearly protect the privacy of the employee's personal email communications via a business device or system.

While federal law does not specifically prohibit discrimination based on criminal convictions or arrests, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a policy statement indicating that an employer's use of criminal history information in making employment decisions may violate the federal prohibition against discrimination based on race or national origin.

In addition, employers should take care to identify where contractual language has been added for clarity since redundancies may otherwise be used against the drafter.

The lawsuit against the shooter's former employer, G4S, alleges that it knew he was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet they employed him as an armed guard, obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, and repeatedly gave him weapons training, making him a more effective and dangerous shooter.

Most people use Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and other social media postings as an everyday event with little thought about how such information may later be used by an employer or against them in court proceedings in workplace related disputes.

Social Media & Digital Footprints Most people use Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter and other social media postings as an everyday event with little thought about how such information may later be used by an employer or against them in court proceedings in workplace related disputes.

Under the present provisions of the Canadian Human Rights Act, employers may use this term to discriminate against disabled persons.

His father, a former Judge, used to head up the agency that pursues the penalties against an uninsured employer.

Roe then filed Roe v. TeleTech, arguing that (a) MUMA provides a private cause of action against an employer who discharges an employee for authorized medical marijuana use, and (b) under the «public policy» of MUMA, employees may not be discharged for authorized medical marijuana use.

If employers want to review social networking profiles to get a sense of what a potential employee is like, I say let them (so long as they don't use the information to unlawfully discriminate against protected groups).

Despite increased employer use of social networking sites, most experts advise employers against the practice in light of the potential risks.

SSL is not foolproof, but it is very effective against Internet - based snooping (read: the NSA, FBI, and employers using the network to listen in).

The ECHR would expect an employer to strike a balance when considering the employee's right to private life against the employer's right to monitor email use in order to protect its business.

A new university study and the ever - increasing use of wireless devices, such as the BlackBerry, could result in a flood of lawsuits against employers for creating an allegedly dangerous environment where unpaid overwork is required for success, promotion and job security, a leading law firm warns -LSB-...] Giving rise to possible claims, is a recent study by Gayle Porter, Associate Professor of Management at Rutgers University in New Jersey, which suggests possible liability for companies if they keep their employees on «electronic leashes» as part of their job requirements.

Ms. Reyes understands both the emotional and financial implications of employment claims, which often arise out of situations that leave the employee helpless against an employer, and uses that compassion and understanding to effectively seek out justice for aggrieved employees.

The new tort of intrusion upon seclusion provides employees with a potential cause of action against an employer where the employer, in an unauthorized manner, collects, uses, or simply views the personal information of an employee that it holds only because of the employment relationship.

However in the absence of such written policies employers must tread carefully before taking steps against an employee based on social media use.

You can use the application for protection against workplace harassment on this page if you are an employer (or the employer's authorized agent, such as an attorney) and you believe that «harassment in the workplace» has occurred.

It is important that you contact an attorney at the Fine Law Firm to discuss the various theories that can be used in establishing your case against the driver and their employer.

Simply stated, the Act prohibits employers from refusing to employ or otherwise taking any adverse action against any person age 21 or older based on that individual's off - premises marijuana use.

Professors who plan to communicate frequently by e-mail should give students the opportunity to reconsider using their work e-mail address as their primary contact in case their employer has a policy against using their work e-mail address for personal matters.

Because disabled employees who are certified for marijuana use can bring discrimination lawsuits against employers, it is vital for employers to know their legal boundaries.