Sentences with phrase «used against your spouse»

It creates a statutory privilege (like the attorney - client privilege) that, except under limited circumstances, ensures that what is said during a collaborative divorce process can not be used against a spouse in court.

Pro se mediation is private and privileged, and so what is said during mediation can not be used against a spouse later in court.

Not exact matches

But another brilliant woman also shows that the same argument is used against women who claim to be raped by their spouse or significant other — that it's not the same, it's not rape, it's her fault.

In defending her husband against allegations of sexual misconduct, Melania Trump is parroting the arguments Clinton used decades ago to defend her own cheating and lying spouse.

Keep in mind that net rental income creates RRSP room, so even a retiree can accumulate RRSP room to be used against a sale (though they or their spouse must be 71 or younger to contribute).

Therefore, you should not put ammunition in the gun for your spouse to use against you.

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

Whether you choose to take the alienation of affection case to trial or to use it as leverage against your spouse in a divorce agreement, we stand by your right to fight for what's fair.

(f) On January 16, 2004, the Applicant misrepresented herself as a landlord in order to obtain, without consent or authorization, credit bureau information of her former spouse and his wife and used this information in her family law proceedings against her former spouse;

The DVTO allows people who have used violence against a spouse or partner to take responsibility for their behaviour and receive support and counselling

Some States Prevent Insurance Revenge With Restrictive Divorce Laws Spouses have been using insurance policies to commit abuses against their exes long enough that, in some states, the courts and state legislators are stepping in.

Each form of life insurance is used to protect the financial interest of a spouse, child, family, or business against death.

You can use the SVS Elevation speakers in acoustically challenging rooms, appease your spouse's aesthetic demands, or even go against conventional best practice when you need to.

When one parent tries to use the child as a weapon of revenge against the other spouse surrounding the divorce... we must make it stop.

Therefore, you should not put ammunition in the gun for your spouse to use against you.

Sometimes a wounded spouse uses adultery to get even but most layers advise against it.

In fact, in the collaborative process, the attorney is contractually barred from engaging in courtroom battles; this allows each spouse to speak openly and honestly in negotiation sessions without fear that the other party's attorney will use his or her words against him or her.

If you should decide to divorce at some point, and the process is contentious, it's conceivable that your spouse could use your adultery against you.

While these orders do not directly affect divorce or change divorce proceedings, they may be used as evidence against you or your spouse.

When everything you say to your spouse can be used against you, you stop talking to him / her.

If I interview a couple different lawyers and my spouse goes in behind me to interview with one of those lawyers that I've laid my entire life out to, but didn't select to handle my case... can they then use that against me in court?

My greatest concern is that I may never end up on the winning side of this fight because my narcissistic spouse has initiated the split after collecting «evidence» to use against me in what can only be referred to as an ambush.

Don't use your lawyer or the system to retaliate against your spouse; it will just cost you more money.

Not to mention, that the severely manipulative clients use the feelings and needs stuff against their spouses and us on such a micro level that therapists who don't focus on the larger patterns never know what hits them.

Spouses often are more open and honest in the collaborative and mediation settings because they know that nothing that is said in the room can be used against them in Court.

Unlike no - fault, where the grounds for the dissolution of the marriage are irretrievable breakdown, covenant marriages may be ended on grounds of 1) adultery, 2) conviction of a felony which mandates prison or death; 3) abandonment for more than one year, 4) commission of domestic violence against the spouse, child or relative, 5) living separately and continuously and without reconciliation for over two years, 6) living separately for over 1 year after a legal separation is obtained; 7) habitual use of drugs and alcohol, or 8) both spouses agree to the dissolution.

On the other hand, if you refuse to let your son see that same suicidal spouse because you think your spouse is mentally unstable and could be dangerous to your son, your refusal can and will be used against you to demonstrate that you are trying to deprive your son of his right to a relationship with his other parent.

If spouses are unable to reach an agreement in the collaborative process, they can not use their collaborative attorneys to fight against each other in court.

Legally, this has been established through the creation of a statutory privilege which will prevent, except in certain, limited circumstances, communications and negotiations during the collaborative process from ever being used against the other spouse in court.

Instead of using your resources to fight against the mother or father of your children, collaborative divorces use the combined resources of both spouses to fight against the practical problems that frequently come with divorce.

This requirement creates a safe, non-adversarial environment so that each spouse knows that the other spouse's attorney is not attempting to gather information to use against him or her later in court.

Sometimes spouses agree to mediation to stall the process or to gather information for later use against the other spouse during litigation.

I'd say 90 percent of the time you've got the scorned spouse who wants to lash out, who wants to use the infidelity as a weapon against the other parent.