Sentences with phrase «used as a cross»

In this case, the image of Ellaiyamman is strategically situated on the boundary that is regularly used as crossing from the colony into the outside world.

... and it can be used as a cross body, a shoulder bag and a clutch!

It also comes with a clip - on gold chain and can be used as a cross body!

This resource was used as a cross curricular activity during a «You are what you eat» topic.

The application can be used as a cross check on what you're telling the employer in your resume.

Not exact matches

Executive coaching is the best way to enable a person to meliorate his interpersonal skills, cross over his self - imposed limitations, coordinate with corporate goals, use feedback as a necessary tool, better the decision - making skills, equalize work and life priorities, create an environment which is useful to the company, etc..

The feature uses real - time location data to match users as they cross paths in real life.

You can also use data to cross - or upsell customers, as Amazon does when it makes friendly suggestions based on consumers» previous buying behavior.

What started as an engineering project crossed over to help our marketing team publish high quality content, which our customer success team is now using as part of an upcoming webinar to existing customers.

Many traders use two (or more) moving averages, so another type of crossover occurs when one moving average crosses another, such as a 50 - day crossing a 200 - day.

But the decision could be used as a non-binding precedent in future cases, meaning judges in other courts could rely on it or ignore it when similar cases cross their desk.

This could make XRP more attractive to be used as a cryptocurrency for online payments in addition to its use as liquidity provider for cross border payments.

In the meanwhile, we remain committed to being the bridge people use to cross to get to the future of finance, helping people switch between local and digital currencies, and make the entire process as simple as possible.

The «hardness» of a currency, they write, «could be defined as the willingness of international agents to hold the currency, as measured by its actual use in cross border financial positions.»

Wal - Mart is testing the use of facial recognition software to support loss prevention efforts by scanning shoppers as they enter the store and cross referencing the images with a database of alleged shoplifters.

I use lists to set goals and I love to cross off things as I accomplish them.

This model can be used as a forecasting tool (as an input to, or cross check of, the central staff forecasts which are predominantly judgemental — and much more detailed — in nature).

And as Jesus told them, his seed, people believing him then, the 12 apostles, that would grow like a mustard seed in to a huge tree... which it did, 33 % of the 7 billion people on the planet believe Jesus was born of the Holy Spirit, performed miracles using the Holy Spirit, and later sent the Holy Spirit to the followers after dying on the cross and raising again on the 3rd day of being in the hands of sinful men.

One means simply «to hang on a cross», but I believe the word crucifixion as used in the Koran means to «kill a person by that means».

So we can use these aspects of the resurrection story as Christian Myth as long as we use them to point to and symbolize the Christian understanding that Jesus was victorious on the cross and survived death.

As the raft is of no further use after the river is crossed, it should be discarded.

This piece was known as the patibulum, and it is this form of the cross that was most often used in Christ's day.

* The motto of Constantine (starting from the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312) is legendarily: «In hoc signo vinces» using the Christian cross as the insignia.

With that in mind, let's consider a few steps to possessing authenticity, using Jesus» words in Luke 9:23 (««If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me») as a guide.

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

He only conceded the use of a simple cross as a Christian symbol.

Because of the cross, then, we are freed to pursue justice and righteousness in the political order; and Christians can do so without experiencing the compulsion to use politics as a means of coercion and manipulation.

For example, Puritan clergy had to respond to a series of specific demands or controversies, such as nonconformity in wearing the surplice and using the cross in baptism.

The cross, which was used by the empire as the ultimate instrument of shame became the symbol of God's suffering love.

Those with access to the site used the cross as a shrine of sorts, leaving messages on it or praying before it.

They use David Bebbington's scheme of marks that identify evangelicalism: conversionism (an emphasis on the new birth as a life - changing experience), biblicism (reliance on the Bible as ultimate authority), activism (a commitment to evangelizing), and crucicentrism (a focus on Christ's redeeming work on the cross, usually pictured as the only way of salvation).

sorry got a little off track we as believers are screwwing up big time we are using His word, Big and HUGE uncool thing, we are still normal, we all fall short of the glory of God, So because of this deception or lack of the proper teaching of the way of the cross we have a huge on set of actual so called Christians that cant even get along, and tell me this dosent exist in the muslim home or what ever cult mindset you are following and that includes the Christian church if they are more consirned with getting you in and keeping you there then setting you FREE!

Christians have used the cross for centuries as the symbol of their religion.

The cross was used as a method of turture and execution for centuries before Jesus was crucified.

the item is a cross - beam that is part of the building and was never use as a religion item before 9/11.

80 % of the argument is that tax payers dollars is being spent on this cross and that its shoving religion down peoples throats, making the root of the problem the funding for the memorial, and using the religious part as a cover up.

As such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosseAs such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosseas an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosses.

As Bultmann uses them, the former refers to an event so far as it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raquAs Bultmann uses them, the former refers to an event so far as it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raquas it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raquas the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raquas judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).&raquas an incident in the annals of ancient history).»

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

It has to do with what he referred to often as the question of usus, the way the cross is put to use in our lives.

’11 To those who understood the «Christian» meaning of this prophecy (and such other passages as were so used), the cross of Jesus ceased to be an «offence» and became part of the message of Easter joy.

If he is placing crosses ON HIS OWN, without consulting the victims» families as to the religious beliefs of the deceased, his use of such iconography may well be inappropriate.

As for taking up your cross I'd much rather see Christians take up their crosses and be allies to the marginalized then use passages like that to beat people into submitting to a teaching that is self evidently damaging.

As for equating the cross to the swastika, I wonder how much you know about the swastika's history, beyond it's use by the Nazis.

The roman satyrs co-opted the symbol of «Yegdrassil» to form the perverse torture devise called the «cross» and used it as a cynical way to kill muses of the old ways.

However, offering slang and fashionable jargon as «renewed» preaching, celebrating the secular embrace of certain Christian symbols (i.e., use of crosses as warnings at highway danger points, putting Christ in Christmas, etc.), or reducing the Gospel to the lowest common denominator of acceptable faith and ethic will hardly be received by a serious world as adequate penance.

For then it would be open to question whether one is dealing with a concept which is possible but which can correspond to no possible reality, or rather with the concept of something truly real.9 In contrast to these different possible dialectical ways in which the initial concept of a universal becoming can be used, Whitehead's categoreal system aims to describe it unmistakably as the fundamental truth: «The ancient doctrine that «no one crosses the same river twice,» is extended.

The Red Sea crossing was not a trap set by God for Pharaoh, but was a form of deliverance for God's people Israel, and Egypt, in their rebellion, tried to use God's protection as a method by which to destroy.

As a side note, I didn't explain the three story types very well, but based on my understanding, I don't put the death on the cross under redemptive violence, unless it is God using violence against Jesus, which isn't quite what happened on the cross...

Even the cross, which might be used as a metaphor of volitional suffering, has been turned into a tool requiring it.