Sentences with phrase «used as strikers»

Sanchez and Theo should not be used as strikers.

He likes getting wingers and wide - forwards that can be used as strikers, so that he can move everybody around to accommodate his favourite players.

Let's face it: Wenger has brought in Sanchez for his versatility; And, in Walcott and Podolski, Wenger has two players who can be used as strikers.

Predominately used as a striker, he is taking good advantage of his development by adapting his game into wide positions thanks to his pace and outrageous skill.

So why doesn't he plays Sanchez as our no 9??! He's way better, has the skill, pace, work rate and finishing, all he needs is a little more discipline in that role and he may be the +25 goal striker we've been waiting for, he carried Barca when Messi was injured so I don't see why he's not being used as a striker ahead of Giroud.

If I may ask why has akpom not been used as a striker in epl dis season.....

If my memory serves me correctly, Welbeck was mostly used as a striker and right - winger, but I'm sure he has played before at left - wing for us and ManU.

Edwards is an attacking midfielder, but he could be used as a striker in the coming weeks, with Harry Kane's injury leaving Vincent Janssen as Tottenham's only fit forward.

He had better move to another club that wants to use him as a striker.

Or Sanchez can be our striker and roam around and interchange with Podolski and Walcott who both have been used as a striker time to time.

Right wing or left wing and was unsuccessfully used as a striker.

The Case For Welbeck I look back at the time Bruce Rioch brought Bergkamp from Inter Milan to Arsenal, and used him as a striker.

Haha so you didn't get to the point about his first few seasons being used as a striker and supposedly failing as his case in point?

Sanchez was used as a striker, but he has sandwiched between two defenders and that just worked for Man City like that.

Lemar is an attacking player who can fit in anywhere along the front - line, he can be used as a striker, winger or as a play - maker.

Not exact matches

If I'm le prof, I'll buy higuain and another striker (a diminutive 1)... if we have to sell giroud to get higuain, then by all means go ahead... we cld use Walcott as our back up and wait 4 welbz to come....

He could also play as a 2nd striker in our little used 4 -4-2 playing off OG12.

While there have been plenty of former Arsenal players, including the TV pundits Paul Merson and Thierry Henry, as well as every man and his dog with an opinion about Arsene Wenger and Arsenal, ready to jump on the bosses back and bemoan his failure or refusal to use the summer transfer window to sign another striker, there are a few that have come out in support of the under fire Frenchman.

I expect him to use it as well, especially after the French striker was the Arsenal player sat alongside Wenger at the pre-match press conference reported by the Daily Mail, which is usually a good sign they will play.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

ozil has no place in a 3421 he can perform in a 3412 where he play behind the two strikers so i will go with ozil behin both danny and lacazette sanchez and giroud can be used as a supersubs but i will tell u this, i hope we win but i am sure we will loose arsene wenger is blinded against top teams and he will play ramsey and xhaka again in the middle and we will be dominated by chelsea midfielders

Ahh as long as it's Arsenal coached by Wenger expect anything, He can decide to use Cech as a Striker who knows..

but i think we are using giroud as a scapegoat for our shortcomings, its not like we defend too well either.we might get a wc striker but how many points will he be worth if we let in cheap goals?i know we got a good gk to help with that, but he alone cant do much..

For Sociedad Vela used to play on the right Griezmann on the left & for Athletico he players on the left or as a striker.

And not only that he does that, but he uses Welbeck, a guy who fails to score a goal even if it's just him and the goal, as the main striker, even though he has Giroud on the bench, a guy who scored a goal in the first game.

Play Laca as a central striker so he can get used to the PL and his team mates as soon as possible, bring Giroud in as super sub.

Now I know that a lot of Arsenal fans and football pundits will use this as a stick to beat Arsene Wenger with, saying that he should have signed a striker in the January transfer window.

as a striker i would rather use Akpom who is familiar with the team then buy someone not proven second rate and spend Arsens money sorry Arsenals money

Liverpool do not even use a pure striker, instead they use wingers as their goalgetters

Let get his work permit sorted out and be used as backup striker after Sanchez, Perez, Giroud, Welbeck and Wallcot, maybe incoming Lacazette or Mbampe.

I do like this idea as the striker has not had a proper summer break since 2013 and was used to having a winter break at his previous clubs in Spain and Italy, but when can Arsenal afford to do without the 27 - year old?

The France international's best position is as a central striker, but he's been used out wide on both flanks at United in recent times.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

We can use him as winger and striker like Thierry Henry, Sanchez and Van Persie.

Chelsea lead # 57m midfield powerhouse chase as they prepare to use Oscar as bait Falcao: Chelsea to offer players in part - exchange for Monaco striker

Wenger is at fault for using him as his primary striker but never for Giroud's failings.

He could fit in well at Anfield where he could either be used as an out and out winger or behind the striker in the «hole».

I just think Wenger is trying to use the strikers more for holdup play and for knocking down headers in the box and things like that — not as primary scorers.

May for now the best possible solution is to get James and use Walcott only as striker.

Podolski is not a winger or natural wide player — he is a second striker and therein lies the problem as we don't play a system to use him properly.

Then the following year he decided to use Alexis Sanchez as central striker thinking that maybe Sanchez will pull a Luis Suarez... And that actually turned out to be quite useful but then Sanchez wont renew his contract and his future remained / remains uncertain....

If we somehow manage to sign top class striker Cavani, if not then reus, use him as LW WALCOTT RW AND SANCHEZ ST THEN ADD KHEDIRA TO THE MIX FOR 8 million # its a bargain and we are a complete team no doubt and 100 percent title cotenders and favourites to win the league no doubt about that every one will agree with me...

THere may be more to that than we know but it could just as easily be true so we really can not use it to give us an indication of what is going on with the striker and his La iga club.

Wenger used him for four and half seasons as our main striker, and it never really worked.

Forget about another striker... France Football again confirmed that Wenger won't bring anybody as Welbeck and Walcott are more than enough in case Giroud does not perform (Sanchez could be use also... Arshavin played at the position too, so nothing is impossible with the «deluded one»).

Top class clubs like bayern do not go after players like giroud or use them as first choice striker for 4 years straight.

He also questions whether the signing of the French striker who could not even get into the Euro 2016 squad would be of much use to the Gunners, but he also advised Wenger to do it anyway as it would be an even bigger risk to not bring in another forward in the current climate of frustration.

d term» world class» is used loosely... giroud is a good striker but showed y he can't b trusted as our no9... missed easier chance but still scored... don't care if u sai he's not good enough but since he plays for AFC, I'll cheer him on for France 24/7... when he's at arsenal, plays like a donkey and he turns to s ** troud, then I'll change my tune... OT, did u see pogba??? believe he has gotten carried with d hype «golden boy of France»....

At this time we have the opportunity to revert to old ways by using players with pace in the squad as strikers, many fans and myself feel we have better opportunities to win games using this format, with Welbeck as forward it even becomes more apparent, he has the skill sets to evolve into the Henry / Wright Hybrid.

Welbeck can be our third choice striker, we could use a right winger as well or start using Theo or the ox in that position.