Sentences with phrase «used at a court hearing»

Details about what went on at the mediation will not be disclosed or used at a court hearing.

Not exact matches

At a hearing in San Francisco federal court, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said he was skeptical Waymo could ultimately prove that Uber's self - driving car program used Waymo trade secrets.
At the resumed hearing on the matter, yesterday, a witness brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mr. Yomi Badejo - Okusanya, told the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that the PDP spokesman used N77.5 million to sponsor media campaigns for the re-election of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan.
At 10 a.m., NYC Department of Consumer Affairs Commissioner Lorelei Salas and Councilman Rafael Espinal, Jr. host a public hearing on predatory lending in the used car industry, CUNY School of Law, 2 Court Square, 3rd floor, community room 3/115 -116, Queens.
From the tidbits of information gleaned at a hearing on Thursday in Federal District Court in Manhattan, it appeared that prosecutors had argued last fall — in a closed hearing and in sealed court papers — to be able to use certain evidence against Mr. Silver at tCourt in Manhattan, it appeared that prosecutors had argued last fall — in a closed hearing and in sealed court papers — to be able to use certain evidence against Mr. Silver at tcourt papers — to be able to use certain evidence against Mr. Silver at trial.
With the U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments 9 December on a case challenging the use of race - conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin, a top AAAS official said there is convincing research on the benefits of a diverse student population in science - related fields.
Even though the material scope of Protocol no. 16 is clearly confined to the Convention and its protocols, some concerns have been expressed in the recent past, notably at the recent hearing held by the ECJ on the draft agreement on EU Accession to the Convention («DAA»), that the use of this new instrument of consultation by courts of the EU Member States might be problematic from the point of view of EU law.
Realizing I have never adequately explained in writing what happens at a family court temporary hearing, and realizing that I shouldn't expect my clients to understand without a thorough explanation either, I drafted the following frequently asked question for use of my clients and my colleagues» clients: What Happens at Family Court Temporary Hearcourt temporary hearing, and realizing that I shouldn't expect my clients to understand without a thorough explanation either, I drafted the following frequently asked question for use of my clients and my colleagues» clients: What Happens at Family Court Temporary HearCourt Temporary Hearings?
[58] At the conclusion of the hearing on March 5, having been made aware that the passage of time was critical because of the potential for the memory of the plaintiff's family computer to be «overwritten» with ongoing use, I directed that within two weeks of that date, an expert engaged by the plaintiff's counsel, at the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this rulinAt the conclusion of the hearing on March 5, having been made aware that the passage of time was critical because of the potential for the memory of the plaintiff's family computer to be «overwritten» with ongoing use, I directed that within two weeks of that date, an expert engaged by the plaintiff's counsel, at the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this rulinat the expense of the defence, produce two copies of the hard drive to be deposited with the court pending this ruling.
The staff can not tell you whether or not you should sue someone, recommend any specific attorney or law firm, give you an opinion about your case or predict how a judge might rule, talk to a judge on your behalf, or tell you what words to use in your court papers or at a court hearing.
Using the services of retired judges would allow for bail hearings with judges at the Provincial Court on the weekend.
I know that not all judges are happy to receive direct e-mails like this, but the court e-mail address could be used in the hope that at least the judge will have the documents before the hearing.
The court reached its decision after considering newly - discovered evidence of police misconduct obtained through the use of digital forensic technology not available at the time of trial and holding several days of evidentiary hearings.
In addition to the change in approach signalled by these rulings, the courts have recently leaned toward the use of summary judgment motions, which in Toronto must be heard within 100 days of counsel's attendance at Civil Practice Court, formerly called Motion Scheduling Court.
«If an illness or a disability prevents a witness from attending the hearing, the court, even on its own initiative, may order that the witness be examined at a distance using a technological means, or appoint a commissioner to take the witness's testimony.
Kyla's successful appeal in BC Supreme Court forced the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to discontinue using their own self - made evidence at IRP appeal review hearings.
What a deposition is, is you going into a conference room, like this, talking to the defense attorney and a court reporter typing it up, where the insurance adjuster and the defense council are trying to gather information against you so they can use it at the hearing.
He relied on the Court of Appeal decision in Clibbery v Allen and submitted that financial and other personal information, when disclosed pursuant to the duty to give full disclosure, must not be reported when referred to at a hearing because of the existence of an implied undertaking not to use such documents for any purpose other than for the proceedings.
the document has been read to or by the court, or referred to, at a hearing held in public (although the court may make an order restricting or prohibiting the use of such a document);
The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated an adverse jury verdict and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Kim's client on the basis that the trial court failed to make the threshold determination of whether an absolute privilege applied to the hospital's use of the plaintiff's confidential personnel file at a labor relations hearing involving unionization of nuCourt vacated an adverse jury verdict and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Kim's client on the basis that the trial court failed to make the threshold determination of whether an absolute privilege applied to the hospital's use of the plaintiff's confidential personnel file at a labor relations hearing involving unionization of nucourt failed to make the threshold determination of whether an absolute privilege applied to the hospital's use of the plaintiff's confidential personnel file at a labor relations hearing involving unionization of nurses.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the originally scheduled trial date is continued for any reason, and upon motion of any party, the court after hearing shall require the tenant or occupant claiming under this section to deposit with the clerk of the court, the plaintiff's attorney, or other secure depository each month (or at such other intervals as the court deems just) the amounts due for use and occupancy, calculated according to the fair market value of the premises, which amounts shall be held in escrow pending final disposition, unless the court determines that such requirement would result in undue hardship to the tenant or occupant.
But merits are not really the name of the game at the cert stage, and if the court accepts to hear the case, Apple will already have used some of its merits - related ammunition.
The BIICL paper submitted that «a carefully drafted written submission can, when skilfully used at the oral hearing, enhance the impact of argument... the use of a skeleton argument allows the advocate two shots at persuading the court of his case».
It was to be observed that (i) there was no express provision within the Disqualification Rules dealing with expert evidence; (ii) where a question of expert evidence did arise, the CPR provisions dealing with expert evidence would apply; (iii) it was within the scheme of the Disqualification Rules for a question or questions requiring expert evidence to be identified at the first hearing of the application and for the court at that stage to give directions for the filing and service of such evidence; and (iv) it followed that expert evidence ultimately used by a claimant in support of the application or that a defendant ultimately wished the court to take into consideration might not have been filed and served by the first hearing of the application.
Paragraph 27.2 of PD32 makes it clear that all documents contained in bundles which have been agreed for use at a hearing shall be admissible at that hearing as evidence of their contents, unless the court orders otherwise or a party gives written notice of objection to the admissibility of particular documents.
In the two cases before the house, the courts below had received and acted on closed material not disclosed to the parties, subject to the orders, taking into account the use of special advocates at their hearings.
Indeed, they admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing that they did not know of even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied Sharia law or used the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, let alone that such applications or uses had resulted in concrete problems in Oklahoma...
At a hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, witness after witness testified about patent trolls who use the threat of ruinous defense costs to pressure companies into paying settlements on vague and overbroad patents.
On occasion a Power of Attorney is used to allow someone in your child's country to represent you at your child's adoption hearing / court date.
Failure of the obligor to so demonstrate shall result in the court using the obligor's income at the time of the hearing in computing child support for the retroactive period.
An oral report of assessment is made in open court at a Settlement / Status Hearing and the parties may order a transcript of the oral report for use at trial.
Generally, absent an agreement, it will be used as evidence at the hearing and although it is technically not binding on the court in most jurisdictions the report is extremely influential in the ultimate custody decision.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z